10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Little girls living in the shadows and becoming victims to “undocumented” aliens seems to have been the problem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?

Dp- they are also going after the hospital. Forced birthers are such garbage. This is what you voted for. This is what you wanted. Own it. The doctors and hospitals are following the laws you fought for. Don’t try and slink away now. Aren’t you proud of yourselves.

Did the hospital challenge the law for the child?

Cool. So you think it should be a question for the courts. Honey, how long do you think pregnancy lasts?

Asking the legislature to qualify for them is not a court case. It’s a phone call.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?

They are going after her because of her own statements. She engaged first.

Her statements. Meaning her legally protected political speech? Aren’t you the first amendment absolutists and here you are saying it’s reasonable to “go after” someone for their legal speech?

. Ask Garland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the girl’s rapist in prison?
Did anyone care about putting the rapist where he belongs? I remember he was live-in boyfriend of the girl’s mother. Did the mother support her daughter or her boyfriend?

Is this your first time hearing about this case? There’s a whole thread here that you can read, with links.

Why are you afraid to answer the question?

You’re here on a thread full of answers to your questions.

You dont’ want to answer and it’s clear why.

NP. He was sentenced to life in prison. Why do you think anyone would be afraid to answer that a child rapist was sent to prison? Why couldn’t you just Google it instead of playing some weird little game?

What was his immigration status? Curious

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

What ‘cause’? Showing the legislature what the laws they passed prohibited? As interpreted by teams of lawyers employed by said hospitals?

From what I see of that law, there was no reason she would have been prevented from having an abortion in Ohio, given her age and risk to her life. The hospital refused, rather than clarify with legislature. The cause meaning turning away legitimate abortion cases to push the idea the state stopped it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the posters blaming the FBI have a way for the federal government to ensure that local law enforcement believes rape reports and takes action— including even collecting the rape kits— i’m all ears.

But testing and taking action on rape kits— heck even 6 days after they’re collected— does nothing at all to protect girls from the consequences of the crime which has already taken place. A rape kit does not detect pregnancy.

So we’re back at the beginning. Why do you think these girls should have to give birth to their rapists babies?

Even the NYT writes articles using words like “almost” in their headlines because they know that rape is an exception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

I got accused of the same when I complained about access to methotrexate. It’s used for auto-immune disorders, cancer treatment and treatment of ectopic pregnancies that haven’t ruptured. Once Dobbs was decided, doctors were afraid to prescribe it to their auto-immune patients. The only state that has a law about methotrexate is Texas, but doctors in many states are freaked out by the prospect of losing their license or going to jail.

If your “cause” is denying patients necessary treatment, then perhaps it is time to reconsider your stance and overall morals.

Your medical records (and others) will show that you’ve been diagnosed with a condition for which methotrexate has been prescribed. If a doctor is refusing, find another doctor. There’s a lot of grandstanding going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the posters blaming the FBI have a way for the federal government to ensure that local law enforcement believes rape reports and takes action— including even collecting the rape kits— i’m all ears.

But testing and taking action on rape kits— heck even 6 days after they’re collected— does nothing at all to protect girls from the consequences of the crime which has already taken place. A rape kit does not detect pregnancy.

So we’re back at the beginning. Why do you think these girls should have to give birth to their rapists babies?

Even the NYT writes articles using words like “almost” in their headlines because they know that rape is an exception.

What are you talking about? There is no rape exception in the Ohio law despite the governor asking for one.

And sadly rape is not an “exception”. There will be at least ten reported pregnancies in girls under 13 in Ohio this year. That doesn’t include the girls whose parents find a way to get them care. It is horrifically common.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

What ‘cause’? Showing the legislature what the laws they passed prohibited? As interpreted by teams of lawyers employed by said hospitals?

From what I see of that law, there was no reason she would have been prevented from having an abortion in Ohio, given her age and risk to her life. The hospital refused, rather than clarify with legislature. The cause meaning turning away legitimate abortion cases to push the idea the state stopped it.

This is not a thing, and there is no mechanism by which to do so, but nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

What ‘cause’? Showing the legislature what the laws they passed prohibited? As interpreted by teams of lawyers employed by said hospitals?

From what I see of that law, there was no reason she would have been prevented from having an abortion in Ohio, given her age and risk to her life. The hospital refused, rather than clarify with legislature. The cause meaning turning away legitimate abortion cases to push the idea the state stopped it.

Your fellow forced birthers disagree

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/14/anti-abotion-10-year-old-ohio-00045843

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

What ‘cause’? Showing the legislature what the laws they passed prohibited? As interpreted by teams of lawyers employed by said hospitals?

From what I see of that law, there was no reason she would have been prevented from having an abortion in Ohio, given her age and risk to her life. The hospital refused, rather than clarify with legislature. The cause meaning turning away legitimate abortion cases to push the idea the state stopped it.

This is not a thing, and there is no mechanism by which to do so, but nice try.

What an abject idiot that PP is. Do they really think doctors call the legislature? Is there some hotline? This is so cringy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

What ‘cause’? Showing the legislature what the laws they passed prohibited? As interpreted by teams of lawyers employed by said hospitals?

From what I see of that law, there was no reason she would have been prevented from having an abortion in Ohio, given her age and risk to her life. The hospital refused, rather than clarify with legislature. The cause meaning turning away legitimate abortion cases to push the idea the state stopped it.

This is not a thing, and there is no mechanism by which to do so, but nice try.

What an abject idiot that PP is. Do they really think doctors call the legislature? Is there some hotline? This is so cringy.

Given the number of lawsuits out there right now asking for exactly this clarification, it’s clear that such a thing doesn’t exist.

But that PP already knows it. It’s just another attempted pivot, just like the “lock up the rapist!” pivot or the “OMG ILLEGALS” pivot or my personal favorite winner of misogyny bingo “but this is her MOTHERS FAULT” pivot.

The more time spent engaging on their pretend arguments the more they feel they’re distracting from the real one: Ohio makes children give birth to their rapists babies[i][u]. That’s the whole story right there and the one they want us to ignore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?

Dp- they are also going after the hospital. Forced birthers are such garbage. This is what you voted for. This is what you wanted. Own it. The doctors and hospitals are following the laws you fought for. Don’t try and slink away now. Aren’t you proud of yourselves.

Did the hospital challenge the law for the child?

Cool. So you think it should be a question for the courts. Honey, how long do you think pregnancy lasts?

Asking the legislature to qualify for them is not a court case. It’s a phone call.

You think you can call up the legislature to get clarification on the law? Wow. Just wow. Try that out and see how that works out for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Why do you think that? These ghouls are still going after the doctor who legally performed the abortion. You think they'd drop the charges against a doctor who did it illegally?

They are going after her because of her own statements. She engaged first.

Her statements. Meaning her legally protected political speech? Aren’t you the first amendment absolutists and here you are saying it’s reasonable to “go after” someone for their legal speech?

There's no bigger crime than embarrassing republicans with the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the hospital cared about 10 year old rape victims, they would have done the abortion and when charged (if, actually), put it to the media. The charges (if any) would be dropped

Do you have any idea what HIPAA is or how it works or how forced birther ghouls enforce the law? Any idea whatsoever?

I think you just like the idea of little girls in peril. I honestly think many of you delight in this mentally. Take it from there because I’m not writing out all the words but I think this excites a lot of you.

Instead of insulting me, why don’t you think about it. It’s my belief that hospitals are doing this to patients deliberately for the ‘cause’

What ‘cause’? Showing the legislature what the laws they passed prohibited? As interpreted by teams of lawyers employed by said hospitals?

From what I see of that law, there was no reason she would have been prevented from having an abortion in Ohio, given her age and risk to her life. The hospital refused, rather than clarify with legislature. The cause meaning turning away legitimate abortion cases to push the idea the state stopped it.

This is not a thing, and there is no mechanism by which to do so, but nice try.

What an abject idiot that PP is. Do they really think doctors call the legislature? Is there some hotline? This is so cringy.

Ha - I remember actually asking that question in law school. This was in our pre-1L intro session, when we were at the SUPER basic level. The professor was explaining how courts have to interpret laws to determine the legislature's intent = and I asked, why can't you just get in touch the legislature and ask them, in addition to doing all this other stuff? I was told that's just not how it's done. But it does seem reasonable to think there might be some mechanism for determining legislative intent like that, even though there isn't.