Huh? I don't know what you're talking about when it comes to "core characters running into each other." The story is naturally about people who interact with one another. By interacting with one another, they become core characters. What you're saying is a logical tautology. Again -- when would people have shared these war stories? While the rebel fighters are trying to destroy the Death Star, are they supposed to be saying, "oh man, remember when the clone wars happened? That sht was sick." Finally, I'm actually a fangirl who happens to dislike it when people throw around illogical criticisms of these things. There are plenty of legit criticisms of Star Wars; this isn't one of them. |
|
It's just a stupid criticism. Just because they didn't go around talking about these things doesn't mean they didn't know anything about them. You can easily explain why Luke, Leia, and C-3PO didn't know about them. Chewbacca can't even speak English. Obi Wan was manipulating Luke by not wanting him to know about any of it.
But I guess we're supposed to hear some random fighters talking about it? Or Lando, who was infamously dodgy with talking about his past? |
|
I want to actually clarify something: Are you actually saying there are LITERALLY no references because you can't be more wrong. Here are two:
Luke Skywalker: You fought in the Clone Wars? Ben Kenobi: Yes, I was once a Jedi Knight the same as your father. Now, of course Ben isn't that forthright about his past, but there's one reference. But here's perhaps the most egregious one that I have to believe you realize exists: General Kenobi. Years ago you served my father in the Clone Wars. Now he begs you to help him in his struggle against the Empire. -- Leia's freaking message to Kenobi in a new hope So I just want to clarify that you're talking about wanting more expansive references than those two? |
Umm in Force Awakens, Rey and Finn act like the Force and Luke Skywalker doesn’t exist and that Luke is some sort of myth, despite him being the hero of the Rebelloon only 25-30 years prior too. So why do you have a problem with Kenobi barely mentioning the Clone Wars and there barely being Jedi in the 30 year gap between the prequels and it have a problem with the original trilogy and sequel trilogy gap?? Also, I rather LIKED that the prequel era felt completely different from the originals. The prequel showed more of a royal aspect to the galaxy while the originals was supposed to show the galaxy as beat up because of the Empire. The biggest issue with the sequels is that it doesn’t try to become its own era and instead is just a copy and paste of the original trilogy with the Rebels vs Empire version 2. |
| PP here. My post is directed at the PP. not who I quoted. |
Yeah people don’t understand that the prequels were all about showing how the Jedi sucked and got manipulated because they were manipulators and liars themselves. Heck, they stole Anakin because qui-got cheated to use the force. The Jedi also were supposed to be neutral but they ended up fighting in a war and siding with the Reublic when their code forbid them too. That’s why Obi-wan is an ass in the original trilogy. He’s basically using Luke to do his own doing. Which, morally, isn’t different from Vader wanting Luke to join him under the empire. Luke represents the guy who makes the morally right decisions in life, while the Jedi and Sith only want things done according to their worldview. |
| No one else noticed the similarities in plot between Rise of Skywalker and Frozen 2? Just me? |
Badly written fan films that are simply cash grabs and don’t tell an actual story? |
You are somewhat underestimating what a Jedi was. He could move things simply by will alone, deflect blaster bolts, face hundreds of enemies single-handed and win, and all the other Force powers that show up randomly. Each was essentially a superman. If we had a superman, on this planet almost everyone would certainly know about it. Given the extraordinarily low number of Force sensitives and the fairly diverse Jedi, it appears they had an extensive recruitment program across the galaxy. |
I haven't seen Frozen 2, but there are tropes that are common to all movies. That's what was "exciting" about the 7th film. Rey was just some ordinary orphan with no special background who happened to be the strongest Jedi in existence. That subverted the "you have to be special" trope. Of course, the rags to riches trope is also a thing as well. So in subverting one trope, they encountered another. |
Umm, what's your evidence of that? There's no way to "recruit" a Jedi. You can identify Force sensitivity and then train a Jedi, but you can't recruit amongst the general population. |
The only one who could find a Force sensitive individual was a Jedi AFAIK. Since there are so few Jedi, there are either a huge number of Force sensitive individuals or Jedi are moving throughout the Galaxy constantly looking for recruits, or there are more than 10,000 Jedi. If there are a huge number of Force sensitive individuals, then the number of Jedi would be larger. |
It’s been established in the books that there are about 10,000 trained Jedi. Considering how many planets there are, it’s not hard to imagine that lots of people would’ve never met one, and might have only a vague idea about the force. Having 10,000 Jedi does not mean they were constantly recruiting. It’s a small number. There are undoubtedly more force sensitive people, but they didn’t necessarily know what their powers were if they were never trained. |
|
I'm laughing at the desperate prequel fanboys and girls. Sorry, the prequels sucked. Most rational fans recognize that.
Thankfully George Lucas sold to Disney or we would have had those monstrosities duplicated in 7-9. Did you see the interview where Lucas was going to go full on Midiclorian in 7-9, and add another kind of magic force virus? What a mess that would have been. |
I don’t understand the point of your comment. Where do you see “prequel fanboys and girls”? Like it or not, the prequels are canon. And what’s your issue with midiclorians? That’s a weird gripe to have. |