Different PP, but I can answer for us. My DH makes $237, I make $233, plus bonus. |
That's why it's real helpful if the wife is well enough educated to also make $250K. |
It's neither a financial or moral decision for my family. We both work because in my case, I enjoy working, I'm good at it and I need external structure to be happy. My husband works because he's also not internally motivated. It's not like he would be saving us childcare costs, or cooking, or fixing up the house if he SAH. He has basically zero handyman or cooking or cleaning skills or interest. Could we live off of one of our $200K salaries? Sure. But there's simply no need for either of us, for our family, in which all our children are teens or older, to have a SAHP. |
|
I don't know anyone who did this, but I do know a female friend who divorced her husband when he absolutely refused to get a job. He was older than her and he supported her through law school, but once she graduated he viewed her as his goose that laid a golden egg. He quit his job and refused to even look for a new one. They had no children, and this went on for several years. She finally had enough because she was working in a big law firm, working nonstop, and he was essentially spending the days playing golf and spending money. She filed for divorce, he fought it, she had to pay through the nose, but she is finally free from him and much, much happier. His lack of even bothering to look for a job really made her lose respect for him. She didn't realize that him supporting her through law school was some sort of quid pro quo in which he would never work again. As I mentioned, he was also older, and made a good 200k+ living before he quit. He wasn't "keeping the home" - they had a housekeeper and he didn't cook or do anything like that.
As for me, I have a marriage that everyone thought was bulletproof, with a husband that everyone thought was the most loyal and loving person ever. Turns out he had a long-term affair and was going to leave me. Our friends were completely floored, as was I. He earlier had suggested I stay at home because my job was so horrible (I was also at a big law firm), and I am glad I didn't because then I would be much more reliant on him now. Now I can assess our relationship without worrying about being able to provide for myself. So, my feeling is to proceed with caution! You never truly know someone. |
Aren't you senior enough that you can take a day off to spend volunteering at your DD's school? That's the best part about having been in the workforce for 26 years, at my current job for 12. I have tons of paid time off, so I rarely miss anything the kids have going on. Plus I get paid to go
|
You may not realize that some people really don't care about someone else cooking and running household errands for them, at the expense of a good salary, especially when the children are too old to need childcare. How hard is it to hire a cleaning service and pick up already prepared food at Whole Foods for dinner? |
Bet he gets lucky whenever he wants, though. |
Ditto. I knew that going in. I would be a terrible SAHM anyway, so it's a good match. |
Why do you think many women have a bonus baby right when the last child is about to start K? |
What has changed? Are you unaware that women of your grandmother's generation weren't generally able to train as investment bankers, doctors or lawyers? What changed was that women are now able to participate much more fully in the workplace than they were 60 years ago. Really? Your post must be a trolling one. |
Finally an honest SAHM. Or SAHW. |
Hell to the no. |
|
I know a lot of people like to rag on SAHM's with kids in school and call them lazy.
But I don't think it's that. I think that it's really scary and intimidating to think about rejoining a workforce after you've been left behind. They know that if they were to get work, it would be difficult and they'd be on the bottom of the ladder. They would go from being independent and calling the shots in their daily lives to taking orders, likely from someone even younger than themselves. I wish people were more compassionate on all sides about our societal dysfunction around the handling of raising kids in the midst of figuring out a livelihood. |
I agree with you. I'd be nervous about re-entering the workforce after staying home. I've always worked though. I certainly don't think SAHMs are lazy but they spend more time on things that I either don't do or I do quickly, like pay the higher price for an item when I see it rather than shop around for the best deal. Regardless, there's value to both ways of life. |
| These conversations always become about the value of working vs. staying home and who is right. The real answer is there is no right answer or one size fits all. Every family needs to make their own decisions about what works best for them at any given point in time, and whether it makes financial and logistical sense for one parent to stay home or cut down hours. There are pros and cons in either scenario. The problem is when partners don't agree on what is right for the family (i.e.: one wants to stay home and one wants both to work). Obviously that is the scenario OP is describing - and like anything else in a marriage, it's a problem when spouses can't compromise and consider each other's and the family's needs. |