Yes. The kids are the things we have in common. I was listing differences. Everyone is determined that I'm an ass. I give up. Also, I don't see spell check
|
Well, remember, he was "JUST" doing the family man thing. My guess is that this woman's three children are not much of a priority in her life as they didn't even rate above her exciting relationships and vacations. |
The posters in this thread are being absurd. Glad you arent taking it seriously OP It's best to just sit back, grab some popcorn, and watch as these people have a meltdown over "HOW CAN YOU THINK YOURE BETTER THEN ANYONE?!!?!?!?!?!" It's crazy. |
| I think your concern is legit, OP. Too often, we dismiss our intuition about a relationship. I'd take it slow and see if these differences become more irritating over time. |
Well, then, you'll be fine. Did I tell you I married a man of a different culture who is 18 years older than me? We did not grow up with the same references (movies, books, food, standards, blah blah blah). Yet we are open-minded and flexible. If you are like this too, don't worry. |
Best advice in this thread. |
|
NP here and I've read the update about you having 3 kids etc. I think it depends how front and central traveling is to your life now along with how adverse he is to traveling. If he never wants to leave his home town and you will never be happy staying in his home town (to live/retire), I don't see that working. You need to be able to agree on where to live at various stages of life. If traveling is an all consuming hobby of yours to the point that you would be neglecting your relationship if you always did it on your own and he had zero interest in joining you ...again a problem. You can fill in any all consuming hobby like he plays soccer every day after work, on the weekend and goes on soccer trips ...if not sharing the hobby means you would barely get to spend time with the person unless you are happy in a relationship where you never spend time together I don't see that working.
If it is anything other than those absolutes, it can work if everyone feels comfortable with his/her choices without putting the other person down. He didn't get a PhD and that's fine if that wasn't the right choice for him but he can't believe that only suckers go for advanced degrees or feel inferior that he didn't get one. You have a PhD, and while you are proud of your accomplishment you can't feel like you are unequally yoked if he doesn't have that same level of education. You have to be able to value/appreciate what he brings to the relationship rather than focusing on what he doesn't have/do and he has to be doing the same. Because you can appreciate the other person, you hopefully meet in the middle ground for some things like maybe he travels a little more because he knows you enjoys it and he appreciates your sense of adventure, but maybe you want to stay around his hometown a little more because you appreciate him being so grounded and able to enjoy some of the more simple things in life. |
| Only DCUM would gloss over the fact she said "I've done so much more than him in life" despite having similar familial backgrounds. Again, this place is a narcissm incubator. |
| I love how we had to get to page 7 for some actual useful advice. |
I think her point is she's done more things than him even with three kids of her own. They just had different interests. Doesn't make the OP a narcissist. Snotty perhaps, but not a narcissist. |
|
This is who OP found - nice man, good personality traits, probably treats her well. But he isn't the most worldly guy out there, may never be, and trying to figure out the cost/benefit to getting more deeply involved.
OP, people generally don't change. Accept him for who he is or go. |
This. You are coming off as judgmental, OP. |
+1. Best response. |
Yeah, I don't get the idea she's a narcissist. More of an elitist. Her problem is that (despite her attempted deflections) she views her different experiences as superior to his. She later tried to backtrack from that but the tone of her post clearly suggested that while she liked him, she was worried that his past wasn't up to her standards. An aside, I do find it strange that it wasn't until page 4 that we learned of her children. Seems a big thing to leave out and makes me wonder whether OP is being fully up front, or just trying to save face following the initial onslaught of criticism. But I'm a naturally skeptical sort. |
+2 |