I really hope the rest of the world stays strong against Trump

Anonymous
French General Yakovleff’s response when asked about why France won’t join the US is absolutely spot on.

"We have five reasons to say no to him, in fact," said Yakovleff. "So, the first one is that he didn't understand that if he wants to carry out a NATO operation, NATO has to take command. So, there will be an American general, but it's a single operation."

“You can’t have an American operation where they’re bombing whatever they can and then below that, the Europeans doing something else,” Yakovleff said. “No, no, no, it has to be one sole operation, under a NATO flag. I don’t think he understood that.”

General Yakovleff went on to point out that Trump's strategic goals, beyond forcing open the strait, are vague and undefined. If NATO nations were even going to consider involvement, they would need the United States to explain explicitly in writing what the goals are.

"And it's not tweets, and it's not things that change every two minutes. So, already there, it's going to be necessary for Trump himself to know what he wants," said the general.

He said that there's also the issue of the lack of "confidence" in Trump. It's well-known that he regularly abandons his allies and he could do so here immediately after other nations got involved.

“He would let us down whenever it suited him," said Yakovleff.

He ended his tirade by comparing Trump to the captain of the Titanic trying to "sell cheap tickets" for his voyage "after having hit the iceberg."

“And the last argument is American: you don’t reinforce failure. I learnt that at the U.S. Army War College. You don’t reinforce failure, you move on, you find something else.” he added. "So, there are a lot of reasons to say no."


More here:
https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/topstories/we-re-not-going-to-go-into-something-where-french-general-slams-trump-s-pitch-for-naval-alliance-to-police-hormuz/ar-AA1YOt5m
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'both sides' and 'Dems support Iran" trolls are so pathetic.


It is and they do, and your refusal to open your eyes to reality is what is pathetic. The two parties have aligned themselves against the interests of the average American. Their differences lie only in their rhetoric and methodology. The democrats get nothing of substance done to help us and republicans actively hurt us. But please understand, they both ultimate service corporate and wealthy interests.

Dems tried to get health insurance for millions of people; Rs blocked it.

I'm a former R, and IMO, Dems are less of a threat to the American people and our democracy compared to today's Rs.


The Dems are feckless because the only time they're ever seen as an alternative is not based on what they actually get done, but by the Reps being an absolute catastrophe.

One of the most popular Dems who ACTUALLY wants to work for America is Mamdani (within weeks, free childcare) and the establishment Dems tried to destroy him (because he refused to stick his head up Isr's ass) and they tried to get a literal sexual predator who used bigotry as his campaign platform and killed the elderly in nursing homes, because they prioritize ISRAEL. "Vote blue no matter who...unless they call out the genocidal foreign monsters we actually serve."

Until Schumer and Jefferies are thrown the hell out of leadership, the Dems will remain unpopular. They are evil and they do not serve America. Chuck tells you himself w/o shame. It is progressive candidates at the local level who are getting votes. Maine is a perfect example of how destructive establishment Dems are. They back the AIPAC candidate. If you don't serve Isr, establishment Dems try to destroy your campaign. That is the one issue that determines if you will actually work for Americans and establishment Dems are traitors who do not. Republicans will get there when the older ones die off, because the younger ones don't want to listen to Ted Cruz sound like Chuck Schumer telling everyone who he actually serves. I mean the nerve to say it out loud.


They tried to "destroy" Mamdani, yet he magically overcame all this pressure from both parties and soared to the top. There is no way they wouldn't have succeeded if they really dreaded his presence in the Gracie Mansion. How woefully naive. His political stance regarding Middle East is irrelevant on the large scale as he has no power on the international arena anyway.

And he has been buddying up to Trump on multiple occasions, he never stood up to him.


Trump is a useful idiot. It’s his entire reason to exist. Why is Mamdani not allowed to also leverage same tool as everyone else?

Jesus, Trump even even tried to dress like him the next day! He dog walked Trump.


So is your "saint" Mamdani He was selected to sell extra taxation to the gullible masses while quelling the distress by pandering to the anti-Israel sentiment. Like someone correctly pointed out, it's not his job to fix things for the Dems on the global arena.. it's all theater. He didn't win "despite" Dems pushing another sh*t candidate (it was pretty clear to anyone with half a brain how unpopular Cuomo was in NYC). He was promoted to promise a bunch of unrealistic BS to the gullibles and have them also like him for his anti-Israel stance, then pivot towards raising taxes and distressing NYC RE to force more discount sales and get funding for the public-private partnerships (connected developer cronies). Also secure government funding for "affordable housing" construction at a price of luxury condos.

I am not going to be shocked if Trump's RE investor fam has a hand in this even if indirectly. The only person being "dog walked" here is you, the taxpayer
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'both sides' and 'Dems support Iran" trolls are so pathetic.


It is and they do, and your refusal to open your eyes to reality is what is pathetic. The two parties have aligned themselves against the interests of the average American. Their differences lie only in their rhetoric and methodology. The democrats get nothing of substance done to help us and republicans actively hurt us. But please understand, they both ultimate service corporate and wealthy interests.

Dems tried to get health insurance for millions of people; Rs blocked it.

I'm a former R, and IMO, Dems are less of a threat to the American people and our democracy compared to today's Rs.


The Dems are feckless because the only time they're ever seen as an alternative is not based on what they actually get done, but by the Reps being an absolute catastrophe.

One of the most popular Dems who ACTUALLY wants to work for America is Mamdani (within weeks, free childcare) and the establishment Dems tried to destroy him (because he refused to stick his head up Isr's ass) and they tried to get a literal sexual predator who used bigotry as his campaign platform and killed the elderly in nursing homes, because they prioritize ISRAEL. "Vote blue no matter who...unless they call out the genocidal foreign monsters we actually serve."

Until Schumer and Jefferies are thrown the hell out of leadership, the Dems will remain unpopular. They are evil and they do not serve America. Chuck tells you himself w/o shame. It is progressive candidates at the local level who are getting votes. Maine is a perfect example of how destructive establishment Dems are. They back the AIPAC candidate. If you don't serve Isr, establishment Dems try to destroy your campaign. That is the one issue that determines if you will actually work for Americans and establishment Dems are traitors who do not. Republicans will get there when the older ones die off, because the younger ones don't want to listen to Ted Cruz sound like Chuck Schumer telling everyone who he actually serves. I mean the nerve to say it out loud.


They tried to "destroy" Mamdani, yet he magically overcame all this pressure from both parties and soared to the top. There is no way they wouldn't have succeeded if they really dreaded his presence in the Gracie Mansion. How woefully naive. His political stance regarding Middle East is irrelevant on the large scale as he has no power on the international arena anyway.

And he has been buddying up to Trump on multiple occasions, he never stood up to him.


Trump is a useful idiot. It’s his entire reason to exist. Why is Mamdani not allowed to also leverage same tool as everyone else?

Jesus, Trump even even tried to dress like him the next day! He dog walked Trump.


So is your "saint" Mamdani He was selected to sell extra taxation to the gullible masses while quelling the distress by pandering to the anti-Israel sentiment. Like someone correctly pointed out, it's not his job to fix things for the Dems on the global arena.. it's all theater. He didn't win "despite" Dems pushing another sh*t candidate (it was pretty clear to anyone with half a brain how unpopular Cuomo was in NYC). He was promoted to promise a bunch of unrealistic BS to the gullibles and have them also like him for his anti-Israel stance, then pivot towards raising taxes and distressing NYC RE to force more discount sales and get funding for the public-private partnerships (connected developer cronies). Also secure government funding for "affordable housing" construction at a price of luxury condos.

I am not going to be shocked if Trump's RE investor fam has a hand in this even if indirectly. The only person being "dog walked" here is you, the taxpayer


Hon, Mamdani has been mayor for less than 3 months and already got free childcare. I'm a NYer. Are you? I find the most psychotically-obsessed loons who hate Mamdani are not even in NY STATE, let alone NYC. My favorites, are the psychos in other countries like Australia. Sky News over there is obsessed w/ Mamdani. Who in the hell thinks that's normal??? I can't even name the mayor of like Brisbane, let alone give a damn about them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'both sides' and 'Dems support Iran" trolls are so pathetic.


It is and they do, and your refusal to open your eyes to reality is what is pathetic. The two parties have aligned themselves against the interests of the average American. Their differences lie only in their rhetoric and methodology. The democrats get nothing of substance done to help us and republicans actively hurt us. But please understand, they both ultimate service corporate and wealthy interests.

Dems tried to get health insurance for millions of people; Rs blocked it.

I'm a former R, and IMO, Dems are less of a threat to the American people and our democracy compared to today's Rs.


The Dems are feckless because the only time they're ever seen as an alternative is not based on what they actually get done, but by the Reps being an absolute catastrophe.

One of the most popular Dems who ACTUALLY wants to work for America is Mamdani (within weeks, free childcare) and the establishment Dems tried to destroy him (because he refused to stick his head up Isr's ass) and they tried to get a literal sexual predator who used bigotry as his campaign platform and killed the elderly in nursing homes, because they prioritize ISRAEL. "Vote blue no matter who...unless they call out the genocidal foreign monsters we actually serve."

Until Schumer and Jefferies are thrown the hell out of leadership, the Dems will remain unpopular. They are evil and they do not serve America. Chuck tells you himself w/o shame. It is progressive candidates at the local level who are getting votes. Maine is a perfect example of how destructive establishment Dems are. They back the AIPAC candidate. If you don't serve Isr, establishment Dems try to destroy your campaign. That is the one issue that determines if you will actually work for Americans and establishment Dems are traitors who do not. Republicans will get there when the older ones die off, because the younger ones don't want to listen to Ted Cruz sound like Chuck Schumer telling everyone who he actually serves. I mean the nerve to say it out loud.


They tried to "destroy" Mamdani, yet he magically overcame all this pressure from both parties and soared to the top. There is no way they wouldn't have succeeded if they really dreaded his presence in the Gracie Mansion. How woefully naive. His political stance regarding Middle East is irrelevant on the large scale as he has no power on the international arena anyway.

And he has been buddying up to Trump on multiple occasions, he never stood up to him.


Trump is a useful idiot. It’s his entire reason to exist. Why is Mamdani not allowed to also leverage same tool as everyone else?

Jesus, Trump even even tried to dress like him the next day! He dog walked Trump.


So is your "saint" Mamdani He was selected to sell extra taxation to the gullible masses while quelling the distress by pandering to the anti-Israel sentiment. Like someone correctly pointed out, it's not his job to fix things for the Dems on the global arena.. it's all theater. He didn't win "despite" Dems pushing another sh*t candidate (it was pretty clear to anyone with half a brain how unpopular Cuomo was in NYC). He was promoted to promise a bunch of unrealistic BS to the gullibles and have them also like him for his anti-Israel stance, then pivot towards raising taxes and distressing NYC RE to force more discount sales and get funding for the public-private partnerships (connected developer cronies). Also secure government funding for "affordable housing" construction at a price of luxury condos.

I am not going to be shocked if Trump's RE investor fam has a hand in this even if indirectly. The only person being "dog walked" here is you, the taxpayer


Hon, Mamdani has been mayor for less than 3 months and already got free childcare. I'm a NYer. Are you? I find the most psychotically-obsessed loons who hate Mamdani are not even in NY STATE, let alone NYC. My favorites, are the psychos in other countries like Australia. Sky News over there is obsessed w/ Mamdani. Who in the hell thinks that's normal??? I can't even name the mayor of like Brisbane, let alone give a damn about them.


How is your free childcare, tell me more.. I had experienced their free Pre-K and it sucked. It relied heavily on parent volunteers on daily basis.

I lived in NYC for 2 decades and have family/friends there, I go there all the time. Would you like me to provide examples of some of these public private partnership development projects that tend to cost awfully a lot to the taxpayer... given it's supposed to be basic "affordable" housing.

developers get tax abatements and discounts on loans, land/infrastructure (covered by public funds if NYCHA redevelopments). They invest their own money, but there is also hefty help from the taxpayer (because "affordable units" will be included). Taxpayers who cannot afford these market rate units or cannot qualify for housing lottery foot the bill supporting the profits of the private companies and the well being of those on perpetual dole. He is continuing the policies of the previous mayor Adams with respect to some of these controversial developments where it's costly to the taxpayer and profitable for the developer.

In addition he is asking for a whooping 21 billion in federal funding for the "affordable housing" in Queens for just 12,000 units. Even if infrastructure redevelopment takes half of this amount or more, it's still more per "affordable" unit than what one would pay for a decent 1 bedr in Manhattan. Are we building luxury housing for the poor at Federal taxpayer expense or are we making some connected developers very rich?

Also, how do you think he is going to pay for "free" anything? Raising taxes. A lot of controversial proposals already in the works. But this is beyond this thread's topic. Back on topic: There is no Batman coming to save you. Good Democrats aren't going fix the world if Trump goes away. They are as corrupt. It's hopium.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'both sides' and 'Dems support Iran" trolls are so pathetic.


It is and they do, and your refusal to open your eyes to reality is what is pathetic. The two parties have aligned themselves against the interests of the average American. Their differences lie only in their rhetoric and methodology. The democrats get nothing of substance done to help us and republicans actively hurt us. But please understand, they both ultimate service corporate and wealthy interests.

Dems tried to get health insurance for millions of people; Rs blocked it.

I'm a former R, and IMO, Dems are less of a threat to the American people and our democracy compared to today's Rs.


The Dems are feckless because the only time they're ever seen as an alternative is not based on what they actually get done, but by the Reps being an absolute catastrophe.

One of the most popular Dems who ACTUALLY wants to work for America is Mamdani (within weeks, free childcare) and the establishment Dems tried to destroy him (because he refused to stick his head up Isr's ass) and they tried to get a literal sexual predator who used bigotry as his campaign platform and killed the elderly in nursing homes, because they prioritize ISRAEL. "Vote blue no matter who...unless they call out the genocidal foreign monsters we actually serve."

Until Schumer and Jefferies are thrown the hell out of leadership, the Dems will remain unpopular. They are evil and they do not serve America. Chuck tells you himself w/o shame. It is progressive candidates at the local level who are getting votes. Maine is a perfect example of how destructive establishment Dems are. They back the AIPAC candidate. If you don't serve Isr, establishment Dems try to destroy your campaign. That is the one issue that determines if you will actually work for Americans and establishment Dems are traitors who do not. Republicans will get there when the older ones die off, because the younger ones don't want to listen to Ted Cruz sound like Chuck Schumer telling everyone who he actually serves. I mean the nerve to say it out loud.


They tried to "destroy" Mamdani, yet he magically overcame all this pressure from both parties and soared to the top. There is no way they wouldn't have succeeded if they really dreaded his presence in the Gracie Mansion. How woefully naive. His political stance regarding Middle East is irrelevant on the large scale as he has no power on the international arena anyway.

And he has been buddying up to Trump on multiple occasions, he never stood up to him.


Trump is a useful idiot. It’s his entire reason to exist. Why is Mamdani not allowed to also leverage same tool as everyone else?

Jesus, Trump even even tried to dress like him the next day! He dog walked Trump.


So is your "saint" Mamdani He was selected to sell extra taxation to the gullible masses while quelling the distress by pandering to the anti-Israel sentiment. Like someone correctly pointed out, it's not his job to fix things for the Dems on the global arena.. it's all theater. He didn't win "despite" Dems pushing another sh*t candidate (it was pretty clear to anyone with half a brain how unpopular Cuomo was in NYC). He was promoted to promise a bunch of unrealistic BS to the gullibles and have them also like him for his anti-Israel stance, then pivot towards raising taxes and distressing NYC RE to force more discount sales and get funding for the public-private partnerships (connected developer cronies). Also secure government funding for "affordable housing" construction at a price of luxury condos.

I am not going to be shocked if Trump's RE investor fam has a hand in this even if indirectly. The only person being "dog walked" here is you, the taxpayer


Hon, Mamdani has been mayor for less than 3 months and already got free childcare. I'm a NYer. Are you? I find the most psychotically-obsessed loons who hate Mamdani are not even in NY STATE, let alone NYC. My favorites, are the psychos in other countries like Australia. Sky News over there is obsessed w/ Mamdani. Who in the hell thinks that's normal??? I can't even name the mayor of like Brisbane, let alone give a damn about them.


They are DESPERATE for him to fail, but he just keeps getting more popular.
Anonymous
Well I find Mamdani noble. Like Bernie. Unfortunately, unless you change our system and not live reflecting capitalism values, it's almost impossible to help those without money here unless you steal, lie or cheat to find the money to give to them. Of course one way you can do it is to convince those with funds to give to those without. That's about the best you can do. America is simply not a society that values those without - it's a country of the strong survive and are to be admired - no matter whether they are good or evil. The only thing that America values is money, not compassion, responsibility, justice, and most certainly, not childcare for all!

Mamdani is popular simply because so many now are in the having less than having more bucket so of course want someone to represent them. I hope he succeeds in his goals but he's definitely fighting an uphill battle all the way. I hope against hope that maybe finally, someone like him can help even 1% of everyone he wants to help.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.


Innocent people were already suffering. In any case, the best case scenario is that this is the thing that pushes the blue wave in the senate along with the house and we put a stop to it all.

Get your head out of your behind. The Democratic leaders are in favor of this war. They are every bit as corrupted by Zionist money, especially Schumer.


We can get rid of those folks, no problem. Please don’t be so stupid as to suggest that both of the parties are the same.

Oh, really, and pray tell, what is your plan for getting rid of Schumer and most of the party's politicians? The idea of a propagandized moron like you telling anyone not to be stupid.


Uh oh, somebody is so grouchy! Maybe hustle down to the break room and get yourself a Snickers bar…?

It’s not most, you big silly. However, it’s easy to track who is getting AIPAC money. It’s become more of a litmus test with every election cycle.

Is this supposed to distract from the fact but you didn't answer the question or are you so stupid that you don't know you didn't answer the question?
Anonymous
Start a new thread about NY, guys.
Anyway, nato is spot on about this! But now trump says he’ll “finish off” the “straight” and see how they like that !
What an idiot.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well I find Mamdani noble. Like Bernie. Unfortunately, unless you change our system and not live reflecting capitalism values, it's almost impossible to help those without money here unless you steal, lie or cheat to find the money to give to them. Of course one way you can do it is to convince those with funds to give to those without. That's about the best you can do. America is simply not a society that values those without - it's a country of the strong survive and are to be admired - no matter whether they are good or evil. The only thing that America values is money, not compassion, responsibility, justice, and most certainly, not childcare for all!

Mamdani is popular simply because so many now are in the having less than having more bucket so of course want someone to represent them. I hope he succeeds in his goals but he's definitely fighting an uphill battle all the way. I hope against hope that maybe finally, someone like him can help even 1% of everyone he wants to help.


hmm- this really made me think- this is probably another reason that americans dont have the same losing their minds reaction to schools being bombed, child victims of gun violence, starving children as europeans do, children are weak and poor so they are worthless to americans. We are ex pats right now and I am surprised by how people outside of the us have such a different relationship and view of children and childhood. children are actually treated like citizens with interests and rights, very different approach to the american approach that parenting is indulging in a very expensive hobby.
Anonymous
Please take the Mamdani discussion elsewhere and stop trying to get this convo off-topic. Please world, remain united in your refusal to help the US with Iran. This needs to be a huge, unequivocal failure for the US. And as an American, I know I will pay the price for our failure. We deserve it for allowing such a garbage person to be elected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.


Innocent people were already suffering. In any case, the best case scenario is that this is the thing that pushes the blue wave in the senate along with the house and we put a stop to it all.

Get your head out of your behind. The Democratic leaders are in favor of this war. They are every bit as corrupted by Zionist money, especially Schumer.


We can get rid of those folks, no problem. Please don’t be so stupid as to suggest that both of the parties are the same.

Oh, really, and pray tell, what is your plan for getting rid of Schumer and most of the party's politicians? The idea of a propagandized moron like you telling anyone not to be stupid.


Uh oh, somebody is so grouchy! Maybe hustle down to the break room and get yourself a Snickers bar…?

It’s not most, you big silly. However, it’s easy to track who is getting AIPAC money. It’s become more of a litmus test with every election cycle.

Is this supposed to distract from the fact but you didn't answer the question or are you so stupid that you don't know you didn't answer the question?


If I wanted to distract you I’d throw a ball. Listen, I really feel like your inbreeding might be affecting your reading comprehension. I’ll give you a little practice and let you go back and read it again, but we can give you a fun hint.

AIPAC funding is an issue now. It was not before. Once a thing is known, one can act on it.

Pretend that you are buying a banana. A banana is a curved fruit that grows in clusters. It’s technically a berry, but you don’t have to worry your little head about that. Let say you don’t know anything about bananas (a fair assumption at this point). You just buy them. Sometimes they are good, and sometimes they are yucky-poo and you throw them off your high chair.

Then, you learn on Sesame Street that bananas should be “ripe.” Once you know this fact you can be better about choosing bananas. Sure, they won’t all be great, but you now have information about how to shop and, on average, you can be a better consumer of bananas.

Now think hard about how this might apply to voting and AIPAC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'both sides' and 'Dems support Iran" trolls are so pathetic.


It is and they do, and your refusal to open your eyes to reality is what is pathetic. The two parties have aligned themselves against the interests of the average American. Their differences lie only in their rhetoric and methodology. The democrats get nothing of substance done to help us and republicans actively hurt us. But please understand, they both ultimate service corporate and wealthy interests.

Dems tried to get health insurance for millions of people; Rs blocked it.

I'm a former R, and IMO, Dems are less of a threat to the American people and our democracy compared to today's Rs.


The Dems are feckless because the only time they're ever seen as an alternative is not based on what they actually get done, but by the Reps being an absolute catastrophe.

One of the most popular Dems who ACTUALLY wants to work for America is Mamdani (within weeks, free childcare) and the establishment Dems tried to destroy him (because he refused to stick his head up Isr's ass) and they tried to get a literal sexual predator who used bigotry as his campaign platform and killed the elderly in nursing homes, because they prioritize ISRAEL. "Vote blue no matter who...unless they call out the genocidal foreign monsters we actually serve."

Until Schumer and Jefferies are thrown the hell out of leadership, the Dems will remain unpopular. They are evil and they do not serve America. Chuck tells you himself w/o shame. It is progressive candidates at the local level who are getting votes. Maine is a perfect example of how destructive establishment Dems are. They back the AIPAC candidate. If you don't serve Isr, establishment Dems try to destroy your campaign. That is the one issue that determines if you will actually work for Americans and establishment Dems are traitors who do not. Republicans will get there when the older ones die off, because the younger ones don't want to listen to Ted Cruz sound like Chuck Schumer telling everyone who he actually serves. I mean the nerve to say it out loud.


They tried to "destroy" Mamdani, yet he magically overcame all this pressure from both parties and soared to the top. There is no way they wouldn't have succeeded if they really dreaded his presence in the Gracie Mansion. How woefully naive. His political stance regarding Middle East is irrelevant on the large scale as he has no power on the international arena anyway.

And he has been buddying up to Trump on multiple occasions, he never stood up to him.


Trump is a useful idiot. It’s his entire reason to exist. Why is Mamdani not allowed to also leverage same tool as everyone else?

Jesus, Trump even even tried to dress like him the next day! He dog walked Trump.


So is your "saint" Mamdani He was selected to sell extra taxation to the gullible masses while quelling the distress by pandering to the anti-Israel sentiment. Like someone correctly pointed out, it's not his job to fix things for the Dems on the global arena.. it's all theater. He didn't win "despite" Dems pushing another sh*t candidate (it was pretty clear to anyone with half a brain how unpopular Cuomo was in NYC). He was promoted to promise a bunch of unrealistic BS to the gullibles and have them also like him for his anti-Israel stance, then pivot towards raising taxes and distressing NYC RE to force more discount sales and get funding for the public-private partnerships (connected developer cronies). Also secure government funding for "affordable housing" construction at a price of luxury condos.

I am not going to be shocked if Trump's RE investor fam has a hand in this even if indirectly. The only person being "dog walked" here is you, the taxpayer


Hon, Mamdani has been mayor for less than 3 months and already got free childcare. I'm a NYer. Are you? I find the most psychotically-obsessed loons who hate Mamdani are not even in NY STATE, let alone NYC. My favorites, are the psychos in other countries like Australia. Sky News over there is obsessed w/ Mamdani. Who in the hell thinks that's normal??? I can't even name the mayor of like Brisbane, let alone give a damn about them.


How is your free childcare, tell me more.. I had experienced their free Pre-K and it sucked. It relied heavily on parent volunteers on daily basis.

I lived in NYC for 2 decades and have family/friends there, I go there all the time. Would you like me to provide examples of some of these public private partnership development projects that tend to cost awfully a lot to the taxpayer... given it's supposed to be basic "affordable" housing.

developers get tax abatements and discounts on loans, land/infrastructure (covered by public funds if NYCHA redevelopments). They invest their own money, but there is also hefty help from the taxpayer (because "affordable units" will be included). Taxpayers who cannot afford these market rate units or cannot qualify for housing lottery foot the bill supporting the profits of the private companies and the well being of those on perpetual dole. He is continuing the policies of the previous mayor Adams with respect to some of these controversial developments where it's costly to the taxpayer and profitable for the developer.

In addition he is asking for a whooping 21 billion in federal funding for the "affordable housing" in Queens for just 12,000 units. Even if infrastructure redevelopment takes half of this amount or more, it's still more per "affordable" unit than what one would pay for a decent 1 bedr in Manhattan. Are we building luxury housing for the poor at Federal taxpayer expense or are we making some connected developers very rich?

Also, how do you think he is going to pay for "free" anything? Raising taxes. A lot of controversial proposals already in the works. But this is beyond this thread's topic. Back on topic: There is no Batman coming to save you. Good Democrats aren't going fix the world if Trump goes away. They are as corrupt. It's hopium.


so what's your solution? who are your leaders?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


The goal was to destroy the country and sell it for parts to the oligarchs. This might be the first thing that Trump has ever successfully done.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: