I really hope the rest of the world stays strong against Trump

[Anonymous]

You sound wealthy and out of touch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.

Innocent people were already suffering. In any case, the best case scenario is that this is the thing that pushes the blue wave in the senate along with the house and we put a stop to it all.

Get your head out of your behind. The Democratic leaders are in favor of this war. They are every bit as corrupted by Zionist money, especially Schumer.

Some, yes. But there is a whole new generation of folks out there looking to get elected, and the world is going to change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.

Innocent people were already suffering. In any case, the best case scenario is that this is the thing that pushes the blue wave in the senate along with the house and we put a stop to it all.

Get your head out of your behind. The Democratic leaders are in favor of this war. They are every bit as corrupted by Zionist money, especially Schumer.

We can get rid of those folks, no problem. Please don’t be so stupid as to suggest that both of the parties are the same.

[Anonymous]

I agree, OP! Hope they stay strong.
Spain and china the best so far, with Spain saying trump violated international law (adding to Venezuela violation) and china giving reparations to parents of little girls trump killed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You sound wealthy and out of touch.

I think op is neither, truth is we may have to suffer a bit to get the trump zombies to finally wake up. If we all have to pay $100+ to fill our tanks, it may finally get them to rethink their alliance to the cult. It’s worth it to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow trump really makes the left look crazy supporting Iran that kills women and gay people. Imagine if they voted for ayatolah harris

You don't have to support a country to be against bombing their schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.

Innocent people were already suffering. In any case, the best case scenario is that this is the thing that pushes the blue wave in the senate along with the house and we put a stop to it all.

Get your head out of your behind. The Democratic leaders are in favor of this war. They are every bit as corrupted by Zionist money, especially Schumer.

We can get rid of those folks, no problem. Please don’t be so stupid as to suggest that both of the parties are the same.

The GOP is in an awful league of their own during the soon to be over Trump era but our corrupted political system that allowed someone as weak and awful as Trump to win TWO terms shows no sign of reform in the near future.

Getting rid of our senior politicians who are heavily funded through their established relationships with mega-donors is easier said than done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You sound wealthy and out of touch.

I think op is neither, truth is we may have to suffer a bit to get the trump zombies to finally wake up. If we all have to pay $100+ to fill our tanks, it may finally get them to rethink their alliance to the cult. It’s worth it to me.

Agreed. Since the Trump administration is unleashing chaos all over the world, it's only fitting that Americans feel a little of the pain that people in other countries are feeling right now due to the decisions Trump has made.

[Anonymous]

They are not wrong for their reasons not to support Trump.

[Anonymous]

Even the WSJ editorial board, which has been supportive of the Iran war, made this sarcastic aside in an editorial about the Straits of Hormuz.

"Good thing the President hasn’t antagonized allies with tariffs or threats to invade Greenland. This is a reminder that treating allies well is wise so they are more likely to help when you really need them."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is so pathetic. Plays "war" and realizes he's in deep sh$t and is now trying to badger all of our former allies into sharing in his ill-fated boondoggle. I sincerely pray that Europe, Canada, Australia and the rest of the world stays strong and refuses to step in to "help." How Republicans, regardless of where they are in the GOP continuum, continue to support this buffoon is beyond my comprehension. Please world, save us from ourselves. Stand up to him, mock him, dismiss him. Let him feel failure. I hope gas goes up to $7 a gallon. I

Agree to infinity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.

The only way it will have a rapid conclusion is for Trump's cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment. Actually, I can see Vance and Rubio working surreptitiously to do just this because both are smart enough to know if this war of choice continues it destroys their political future.

[Anonymous]

The 'both sides' and 'Dems support Iran" trolls are so pathetic.

[Anonymous]

One reason they aren’t supporting is uk security adviser sat in on talks and felt they were going really well, Iran had offered good solutions. Then, trump struck Iran anyway. No one trusts his judgement.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/17/uk-security-adviser-attended-us-iran-talks-and-judged-deal-was-within-reach

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm no fan of Trump, but really you should hope for a rapid conclusion to this, OP. The longer it goes on, the more innocent people will suffer.

The only way it will have a rapid conclusion is for Trump's cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment. Actually, I can see Vance and Rubio working surreptitiously to do just this because both are smart enough to know if this war of choice continues it destroys their political future.

If this was really going to happen, the timing would be tricky. Remove him before the midterms (and this requires a 2/3 vote in Congress) then the base won't turn out to vote. But if the Democrats take back the House and Vance becomes president, Speaker Jeffries would refuse to allow the VP vacancy to be filled.