By your own wording , you are incorrect because the only way the Jewish population would have not lost significant numbers after six million dead is either lots of babies or there were no mass genocides of Sephardic/Middle East Jews. There’s no way there would only be a population decline of 800,000 if there was consecutive Jewish genocide in Europe and the Middle East. Either Jews had tons of babies or the Middle East didn’t kill their Jews |
Because when someone steals your land, you fight back. Never surrender. |
| Seriously. Are we having this conversation in America? We never surrender. |
Israel is a terrorist country so not much difference there. |
We’re at the point in the sick f^ck arc of Zionism where you are insisting that the Palestinians actually want to be victims in a genocide. 6 year old Hind Rajab WANTED to be shot 355 times. Please, for the love of all that’s holy … skyscraper yourself. The world would be a far better place. |
The AUDACITY of a ZIONIST calling someone else but THEMSELF a death cult. Your policies kill innocent children every.single.day. My close American friend just got back from Gaza where he volunteered as a doctor for a couple of weeks. He received multiple victims with gunshots to the head from food aid traps. He video taped it! Mostly children and teenagers. Zionists want “Chaim” for themselves and death to everybody who resists the outright thievery of their homes. |
You dodged the question. It’s true that Hamas slaughtered over a thousand civilians (including attacking a civilian music festival) and continues to hold hostages, which is a flagrant human right abuse. Hamas is a designated terrorist organization. Don’t you agree with these simple facts? (I’m not interested in your childish what-aboutisms. Do you agree or not?). |
| I would be happy to get on board with recognizing Palestine if Hamas surrendered. Right now, if Hamas prevailed, it would mean that you can gain statehood by slaughtering your neighbors. I can't get on board with that. I don't like what's going on in Palestine, but it's not like the violence would end if we recognized Palestine and Israel backed down. All that would change is that the violence would be in both directions. It really, really sucks that innocent people are being harmed by this, but I can't see how handing a terrorist organization a nation is the right path forward for peace. If anyone can explain it to me calmly, without calling me names, I am open to hearing because I genuinely don't understand. Right now, the argument is just "people are starving"-- which is bad, but how does statehood or Israel backing down reduce the violence when we know full well that Hamas and Iran want to continue it? |
So Israel has legitimized itself by committing violence against the Palestinians, but the Palestinians are delegitimizing themselves by standing up to the violence? Got it. I realize that the justification for stealing their land is that a magical man in the sky says you deserve to, but maybe think critically for a minute. |
DP. Most of the evidence suggests that the majority of Israeli civilians deaths on Oct7 were result of IDF tank and artillery fire. The area in which Oct7 happened is moderate and a stronghold of opposition against Netanyahu. One of the few areas in the country like that. It seems very convenient that this area had troops moved to other areas of Israel before the attack, the IDF showed little concern for civilians collateral damage and Israel has done nothing to get the hostages taken from the area back. |
| What you are seeing in Gaza has nothing to do with getting the hostages back, defense of Israel or revenge for Oct7. This is all part of the plan. |