why doesn't hamas surrender?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is as stupid a question as:
Why don’t the Israelis oust Netanyahu and declare peace?

Declare peace with whom? The terrorists? If Hamas is in charge, there is nobody to declare peace with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You really think that's what this is about? Oh you poor sweet summer child.

yes, I do. and I guess I am a child. so explain it to me. why not just surrender, as always happened in the past?

Because you’re clearly a stupid dull child.

Hamas’s surrender is irrelevant. The jews will keep killing Palestinians regardless. This is a genocide. Surrendering isn’t going to stop it, so there’s no point in Hamas surrendering. The genocide is going to keep going until the world stops the jews in Israel. Hamas surrender is irrelevant to that.

[Anonymous]

OP- what, in your mind, happens when Hamas surrenders?

[Anonymous]

It’s because the hardliners in Israel want to decimate and eliminate the Palestinian population. Other Israelis either want the same thing or are willing to be passive and let the extremists do their thing. Israel has been shown to consistently lie and cover up their atrocities. The US is a complicit partner. Hamas knows that if they surrender, Israel will still find a way to make life a living hell for the Palestinians

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP- what, in your mind, happens when Hamas surrenders?

She thinks the genocide will stop. Clueless idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The news out of Gaza is horrifying. It has made me think about past wars, and how they ended. During WWII, both Japan and Germany surrendered. They surrendered and threw themselves at the mercy of the victor. I imagine when the US withdrew from S. Vietnam, the government we propped up surrendered to N. Vietnam.

Why doesn't Hamas do this? wouldn't all this horror end if they would? One might not like to lose, but they have lost. War is like that. It is horrible and the strong win.

You need to think a little more. There are wars where the losers did not accept defeat. A good example was Paraguay v Brazil:

https://www.britannica.com/event/War-of-the-Triple-Alliance

"The Paraguayan people had been fanatically committed to López and the war effort, and as a result they fought to the point of dissolution. The war left Paraguay utterly prostrate; its prewar population of approximately 525,000 was reduced to about 221,000 in 1871, of which only about 28,000 were men. During the war the Paraguayans suffered not only from the enemy but also from malnutrition, disease, and the domination of López, who tortured and killed countless numbers. "

but isn't this just another example of why, when you lose a war, you should surrender?

That particular war seemed irrational from the start, but then the reason that countries go to war in the first place often aren't clear either. I mean if the war was instigated by people who weren't actually interested in winning in the first place for example, maybe they just wanted to galvanize their control of the country or something. Maybe they just wanted to get all of the Muslims in America worked up.

[Anonymous]

Why doesn't the only armed resistance to a genocidal force lay down its weapons and surrender the only chance they have at self-defense?

I don't know. That's a tough one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hamas only cares about self preservation as the institution that controls the power in Gaza. Nothing else matters to them. Nothing. Why would they ever surrender?

for the same reason that the germans and japanese surrendered? because they recognize they lost and want to stop the suffereing of innocents?

Rulers only surrender when their own life is at stake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is as stupid a question as:
Why don’t the Israelis oust Netanyahu and declare peace?

this would be a good thing. But the question remains...will the hostages ever return and will Hamas be eradicated? We all know the answer to that don't we? it makes me want to vomit.

Whether or not Hamas is eradicated is irrelevant, from its ashes will grow another movement that will fight for the rights of the Palestinian people to live in Israel
Zionism was a dream for 2 millennia, the Palestinians have the same dream too.
The one was not eradicated, what makes you think that the other will be?

I don’t understand the reluctance of Israelis to pursue peace

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Terrorists don’t surrender.

No because they feel their lives are more important than the Palestinians. They are now looting the aid coming in. Shocking.

Of course, they are Palestinians. Some are apparently worth more than others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The news out of Gaza is horrifying. It has made me think about past wars, and how they ended. During WWII, both Japan and Germany surrendered. They surrendered and threw themselves at the mercy of the victor. I imagine when the US withdrew from S. Vietnam, the government we propped up surrendered to N. Vietnam.

Why doesn't Hamas do this? wouldn't all this horror end if they would? One might not like to lose, but they have lost. War is like that. It is horrible and the strong win.

It took bombs dropped on Japan for them to surrender. Germany fought to the bitter end even though it meant destroying their country.

Right now Israel are the aggressors who are systematically eliminating Palestinian citizens, children, women, the elderly with their bombs, guns, and denying them food and medicine causing the kind of suffering that everyone should fear. If they surrender tomorrow Israel will continue stealth elimination of Palestinians so that there won’t be enough Palestinians to sustain a country. That’s the goal of Israel and the extremist crowds are dreaming of the day when the last Palestinian has been shot to death.

The fanaticism of the Japanese, exemplified in their typical refusal to surrender even in the face of certain defeat, changed only when atomic bombs made it crystal clear that endless civilians would die if the military kept fighting. Unlike Hamas, the Japanese bowed to the inevitable in order to preserve remaining civilian lives.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-25772192

The Japanese mindset then is still difficult to comprehend; the Hamas mindset is utterly depraved and even more incomprehensible to civilized people.

[Anonymous]

If this is a genocide, Israel sucks at it. More than 30 months in and the Palestinians keep birthing babies and carrying on. You’d think they’d be more efficient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this is a genocide, Israel sucks at it. More than 30 months in and the Palestinians keep birthing babies and carrying on. You’d think they’d be more efficient.

Great argument you got there genius!
A+ for critical thinking skills

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this is a genocide, Israel sucks at it. More than 30 months in and the Palestinians keep birthing babies and carrying on. You’d think they’d be more efficient.

This actually makes sense. If Israel wanted to eliminate the Palestinians, it obviously has the military power to do so. It hasn't. No "genocide", merely ongoing operations to free the hostages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this is a genocide, Israel sucks at it. More than 30 months in and the Palestinians keep birthing babies and carrying on. You’d think they’d be more efficient.

Great argument you got there genius!
A+ for critical thinking skills

So you just think Israel sucks at genocide? That it wants to eradicate the Palestinians, but just isn’t able to?