Prince Harry’s Latest Private Struggle: Hollywood or Home?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Y’all this is the “proof” that Meghan staged a photoshoot with actors pretending to be her family. Markle haters have jumped the snark and are in conspiracy theory territory.


I thought the story of this not being Meghan was bogus until I saw this picture. This is not Meghan- bigger nose, weaker chin, different teeth. It’s very possible this picture was doctored.

Some weird face distortion filter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:...He also has stayed involved in veterans causes and the Invictus Games.


Harry should be condemned for using OUR wounded servicemembers as a prop for his own image building. "Oh, look at wonderful Harry spending time with those poor, brave amputees!" And funneling corporate money into his private charity, which of course doesn't have any U.S. oversight since it's foreign.

The word is out about him among the US military community and they are no longer buying what he's selling. The US had its own official Defense Dept. sponsored Warrior Games long before the Prince showed up.


Anyone actually involved in the Wounded Warrior community knows that Harry was inspired by the Warrior Games and wanted to find a way to give veterans worldwide a similar outlet. Hate to break it to you, but the Olympics also has corporate sponsors. I don't even know why I'm bothering here.


Anyone actually involved in the wounded warrior community with critical thinking skills has always asked, "We have our own US based, DoD-sponsored Warrior Games. Why do we need another one, sponsored by the Prince, no less? Why should sponsorship money go to HIS charity rather than long-established US based veterans charities WITH oversight?"

And anyone who actually does not agree with the Prince's exploitation of wounded servicemembers should be asking the same questions, not defending him.


So, the thing is, there are people outside the US who don’t have the same opportunities, as the DoD only funds the program for US veterans. If the charity was so questionable, why did his brother donate $1M to it fairly recently?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Y’all this is the “proof” that Meghan staged a photoshoot with actors pretending to be her family. Markle haters have jumped the snark and are in conspiracy theory territory.


I thought the story of this not being Meghan was bogus until I saw this picture. This is not Meghan- bigger nose, weaker chin, different teeth. It’s very possible this picture was doctored.

Some weird face distortion filter.


The person who created that image said they put it through “a few apps” and that’s what was created. Reminds me of the “enhance!” memes.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Y’all this is the “proof” that Meghan staged a photoshoot with actors pretending to be her family. Markle haters have jumped the snark and are in conspiracy theory territory.


I thought the story of this not being Meghan was bogus until I saw this picture. This is not Meghan- bigger nose, weaker chin, different teeth. It’s very possible this picture was doctored.

Some weird face distortion filter.


The person who created that image said they put it through “a few apps” and that’s what was created. Reminds me of the “enhance!” memes.


Why would they do that? Being rejected from the BRF made it ok to bully this family. Kind of like Trump opening the escape hatch for all the underground freaks
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:...He also has stayed involved in veterans causes and the Invictus Games.


Harry should be condemned for using OUR wounded servicemembers as a prop for his own image building. "Oh, look at wonderful Harry spending time with those poor, brave amputees!" And funneling corporate money into his private charity, which of course doesn't have any U.S. oversight since it's foreign.

The word is out about him among the US military community and they are no longer buying what he's selling. The US had its own official Defense Dept. sponsored Warrior Games long before the Prince showed up.


Anyone actually involved in the Wounded Warrior community knows that Harry was inspired by the Warrior Games and wanted to find a way to give veterans worldwide a similar outlet. Hate to break it to you, but the Olympics also has corporate sponsors. I don't even know why I'm bothering here.


Anyone actually involved in the wounded warrior community with critical thinking skills has always asked, "We have our own US based, DoD-sponsored Warrior Games. Why do we need another one, sponsored by the Prince, no less? Why should sponsorship money go to HIS charity rather than long-established US based veterans charities WITH oversight?"

And anyone who actually does not agree with the Prince's exploitation of wounded servicemembers should be asking the same questions, not defending him.


So, the thing is, there are people outside the US who don’t have the same opportunities, as the DoD only funds the program for US veterans. If the charity was so questionable, why did his brother donate $1M to it fairly recently?


Stop trying to obfuscate. The fact remains that the vast majority of disabled veterans are Americans. DoD had the Warrior Games for years before Harry came up with his "bright idea" of Invictus. You obviously have no connection to the US military community or you would know this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:...He also has stayed involved in veterans causes and the Invictus Games.


Harry should be condemned for using OUR wounded servicemembers as a prop for his own image building. "Oh, look at wonderful Harry spending time with those poor, brave amputees!" And funneling corporate money into his private charity, which of course doesn't have any U.S. oversight since it's foreign.

The word is out about him among the US military community and they are no longer buying what he's selling. The US had its own official Defense Dept. sponsored Warrior Games long before the Prince showed up.


Anyone actually involved in the Wounded Warrior community knows that Harry was inspired by the Warrior Games and wanted to find a way to give veterans worldwide a similar outlet. Hate to break it to you, but the Olympics also has corporate sponsors. I don't even know why I'm bothering here.


Anyone actually involved in the wounded warrior community with critical thinking skills has always asked, "We have our own US based, DoD-sponsored Warrior Games. Why do we need another one, sponsored by the Prince, no less? Why should sponsorship money go to HIS charity rather than long-established US based veterans charities WITH oversight?"

And anyone who actually does not agree with the Prince's exploitation of wounded servicemembers should be asking the same questions, not defending him.


So, the thing is, there are people outside the US who don’t have the same opportunities, as the DoD only funds the program for US veterans. If the charity was so questionable, why did his brother donate $1M to it fairly recently?


Stop trying to obfuscate. The fact remains that the vast majority of disabled veterans are Americans. DoD had the Warrior Games for years before Harry came up with his "bright idea" of Invictus. You obviously have no connection to the US military community or you would know this.


Holy moly. Harry was at this year’s Warrior Games and the only negative comments on tweets about it came from Markle hate accounts. The two events can co-exist.
Anonymous

Recollections may vary I guess but it doesn’t look like the Warrior Games has a problem with Harry. I guess we’ll all be waiting for news of his org being exposed. Maybe “the headline reporter” will write an article about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harry has always wanted a more "quiter more subdued role".
Hence his exile (although why they chose LA leaves all of us wondering...).

Because that’s Meghan’s hometown.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you ever think he wonders… “oh my gosh, what did I do?” …


Yes, I think he probably has.

But then again, when he returns home, he might find the rules and regimentation there to be incredibly stifling.

?

I'm guessing he misses the structure. (Even if it wasn't fun.)
Do you think there is ever a moment he thinks, "I could have had almost any woman in the world - including 22 y/0 Victoria Secret models- and I chose this..."?


DP. No. Harry grew up in the lap of luxury without enough money to support that lifestyle. He would never have married some random young VS Model unless it was someone like Gisele with real dough (and someone like that would never be interested in him). Meghan is good at monetizing things.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I smell divorce, frankly.


Wishful thinking. You should mind your own marriage instead of wishing other people ill.

DP, but this is the classic deflection of the abuser. This is exactly what my narc cousin said when people warned her that sh-tshow of a marriage (with another narc) was on the rocks. She thought we were wishing her ill. Turned out she had been gossiping about all our marriages and stealing stuff from people all along. She viewed any advice, even helpful criticism, as an attack because that was how she behaved. For you to say this, I have to wonder about you and your private ways of behaving.

PP made an assessment of two public figures who thrive off of attention and want everyone's attention on them. Who want attention so much that they'll go on a "Worldwide Privacy Tour" to get it. You can't seek the public's attention and then get mad when the public make critical assessments about you. Doesn't work that way, sweetheart.

+100
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:...He also has stayed involved in veterans causes and the Invictus Games.


Harry should be condemned for using OUR wounded servicemembers as a prop for his own image building. "Oh, look at wonderful Harry spending time with those poor, brave amputees!" And funneling corporate money into his private charity, which of course doesn't have any U.S. oversight since it's foreign.

The word is out about him among the US military community and they are no longer buying what he's selling. The US had its own official Defense Dept. sponsored Warrior Games long before the Prince showed up.


Anyone actually involved in the Wounded Warrior community knows that Harry was inspired by the Warrior Games and wanted to find a way to give veterans worldwide a similar outlet. Hate to break it to you, but the Olympics also has corporate sponsors. I don't even know why I'm bothering here.


Anyone actually involved in the wounded warrior community with critical thinking skills has always asked, "We have our own US based, DoD-sponsored Warrior Games. Why do we need another one, sponsored by the Prince, no less? Why should sponsorship money go to HIS charity rather than long-established US based veterans charities WITH oversight?"

And anyone who actually does not agree with the Prince's exploitation of wounded servicemembers should be asking the same questions, not defending him.


So, the thing is, there are people outside the US who don’t have the same opportunities, as the DoD only funds the program for US veterans. If the charity was so questionable, why did his brother donate $1M to it fairly recently?


Stop trying to obfuscate. The fact remains that the vast majority of disabled veterans are Americans. DoD had the Warrior Games for years before Harry came up with his "bright idea" of Invictus. You obviously have no connection to the US military community or you would know this.


Holy moly. Harry was at this year’s Warrior Games and the only negative comments on tweets about it came from Markle hate accounts. The two events can co-exist.


What matters more than tweets are what military members are communicating among themselves. And to their members of Congress. No "entertainer" (Harry) should be allowed to exploit our wounded nor have any US taxpayer money funneled his way.
Anonymous
It does my heart good to see that DCUM is finally seeing the truth about Meghan and Harry. Their game of illusions must be really crumbling. Y'all have been unplugged from the Matrix, ladies! Welcome!
Anonymous
Completely agree. I’ve never seen a couple be so off limits and so lauded in an almost Manchurian Candidate kind of way where other conversations are allowed to amble aimlessly. There is something really disturbing about Harry trying to monetize our wounded veterans and something really sinister going on here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It does my heart good to see that DCUM is finally seeing the truth about Meghan and Harry. Their game of illusions must be really crumbling. Y'all have been unplugged from the Matrix, ladies! Welcome!


Many of us have never plugged in. Prince Harry = Lance Amstrong
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: