America is far from free. Why do we accept living under perpetual fear of endless gun violence?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1131259.page


Conservative America has far more gun deaths than liberal America, study finds

A comprehensive new study breaks down how firearm deaths correlate to pro- or anti-gun control politics

A horrific recent trend of mass shootings has severely polarized Americans on the topic of firearms. At the center of this heated controversy lies the policy question of gun control: Should the government impose restrictions on firearms and other dangerous weapons to protect the public?

Conservatives turn to the Second Amendment to argue that the Constitution's right to bear arms is sacred; liberals will argue that conservatives are misinterpreting the Second Amendment and that gun control policies have been proven to save lives. The conservative rejoinder to gun control, of course, is that good people with guns can protect the public from bad people with guns.

Yet several recent studies have revealed the exact opposite: In regions dominated by pro-gun politicians, the number of gun deaths is far higher than in areas controlled by pro-gun control politicians.


[...]

More:
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/01/conservative...america-study-finds/


You ever look at the breakdown of who is dying in conservative states?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look at those goal posts move!


Yes they've moved, because our communities have gotten less safe. It's not crazy to look at what politicians are actually doing vs what they say they will do. What, are we supposed to just be happy that they make promises to us at all? Regardless of whether they keep them?

Violence is spiraling out of control. They should be passing gun control or at a minimum, enforcing the laws already on the books. They are doing neither. I don't need politicians to be an influencer class that just tells me gun control is good. They need to actually do their jobs and pass the laws, oversee the enforcement, appropriate funding, etc.


The goal posts have moved since a couple of hours ago when a PP said, "No one is attempting to pass gun control legislation at the federal level. Not the GOP, and not the Democrats." This is just false. If a person doesn't think the proposals are going far enough or that lawmakers are doing enough to try to get the measures passed? Fine. Say that.


None of this matters. And you are focusing on the wrong thing. And it's despicable.



Says you. Democrats are trying to enact federal gun control restrictions, and they should get credit for that. Not just lumped in with Republicans as part of a nihilistic #BothSides complaint.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look at those goal posts move!


Yes they've moved, because our communities have gotten less safe. It's not crazy to look at what politicians are actually doing vs what they say they will do. What, are we supposed to just be happy that they make promises to us at all? Regardless of whether they keep them?

Violence is spiraling out of control. They should be passing gun control or at a minimum, enforcing the laws already on the books. They are doing neither. I don't need politicians to be an influencer class that just tells me gun control is good. They need to actually do their jobs and pass the laws, oversee the enforcement, appropriate funding, etc.


The goal posts have moved since a couple of hours ago when a PP said, "No one is attempting to pass gun control legislation at the federal level. Not the GOP, and not the Democrats." This is just false. If a person doesn't think the proposals are going far enough or that lawmakers are doing enough to try to get the measures passed? Fine. Say that.


None of this matters. And you are focusing on the wrong thing. And it's despicable.



Says you. Democrats are trying to enact federal gun control restrictions, and they should get credit for that. Not just lumped in with Republicans as part of a nihilistic #BothSides complaint.


They are not doing enough. They aren't doing anything that will put a serious dent in this issue. And they are super soft on crime, disdain crime victims, and pretend that we should ignore crime because somehow that will help minority communities (which is clearly false). So they aren't stopping the flow of guns AND are actively stopping the enforcement of laws. You know this is true. You just haven't let yourself accept that they gave hung us out to dry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look at those goal posts move!


Yes they've moved, because our communities have gotten less safe. It's not crazy to look at what politicians are actually doing vs what they say they will do. What, are we supposed to just be happy that they make promises to us at all? Regardless of whether they keep them?

Violence is spiraling out of control. They should be passing gun control or at a minimum, enforcing the laws already on the books. They are doing neither. I don't need politicians to be an influencer class that just tells me gun control is good. They need to actually do their jobs and pass the laws, oversee the enforcement, appropriate funding, etc.


The goal posts have moved since a couple of hours ago when a PP said, "No one is attempting to pass gun control legislation at the federal level. Not the GOP, and not the Democrats." This is just false. If a person doesn't think the proposals are going far enough or that lawmakers are doing enough to try to get the measures passed? Fine. Say that.


None of this matters. And you are focusing on the wrong thing. And it's despicable.



Says you. Democrats are trying to enact federal gun control restrictions, and they should get credit for that. Not just lumped in with Republicans as part of a nihilistic #BothSides complaint.


What's nihilistic is the constant political point scoring over the dead bodies of families and children and pretending to fight for gun control when you're really doing nothing of the sort. This isn't a both sides issue bc the GOP doesn't pretend to try to control the sale of guns. Honestly, someone posted that they want to hire 200 ATF agents. That is NOTHING for the scale of this problem. We need a crackdown.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look at those goal posts move!


Yes they've moved, because our communities have gotten less safe. It's not crazy to look at what politicians are actually doing vs what they say they will do. What, are we supposed to just be happy that they make promises to us at all? Regardless of whether they keep them?

Violence is spiraling out of control. They should be passing gun control or at a minimum, enforcing the laws already on the books. They are doing neither. I don't need politicians to be an influencer class that just tells me gun control is good. They need to actually do their jobs and pass the laws, oversee the enforcement, appropriate funding, etc.


The goal posts have moved since a couple of hours ago when a PP said, "No one is attempting to pass gun control legislation at the federal level. Not the GOP, and not the Democrats." This is just false. If a person doesn't think the proposals are going far enough or that lawmakers are doing enough to try to get the measures passed? Fine. Say that.


None of this matters. And you are focusing on the wrong thing. And it's despicable.



Says you. Democrats are trying to enact federal gun control restrictions, and they should get credit for that. Not just lumped in with Republicans as part of a nihilistic #BothSides complaint.


They are not doing enough. They aren't doing anything that will put a serious dent in this issue. And they are super soft on crime, disdain crime victims, and pretend that we should ignore crime because somehow that will help minority communities (which is clearly false). So they aren't stopping the flow of guns AND are actively stopping the enforcement of laws. You know this is true. You just haven't let yourself accept that they gave hung us out to dry.


You are just repeating a tired partisan narrative. Democrats don’t want to ignore crime and until you can bother yourself enough to learn the true opinions of people it is useless to try to discuss anything intelligently with you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1131259.page


Conservative America has far more gun deaths than liberal America, study finds

A comprehensive new study breaks down how firearm deaths correlate to pro- or anti-gun control politics

A horrific recent trend of mass shootings has severely polarized Americans on the topic of firearms. At the center of this heated controversy lies the policy question of gun control: Should the government impose restrictions on firearms and other dangerous weapons to protect the public?

Conservatives turn to the Second Amendment to argue that the Constitution's right to bear arms is sacred; liberals will argue that conservatives are misinterpreting the Second Amendment and that gun control policies have been proven to save lives. The conservative rejoinder to gun control, of course, is that good people with guns can protect the public from bad people with guns.

Yet several recent studies have revealed the exact opposite: In regions dominated by pro-gun politicians, the number of gun deaths is far higher than in areas controlled by pro-gun control politicians.


[...]

More:
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/01/conservative...america-study-finds/


You ever look at the breakdown of who is dying in conservative states?



Along what lines/categories?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look at those goal posts move!


Yes they've moved, because our communities have gotten less safe. It's not crazy to look at what politicians are actually doing vs what they say they will do. What, are we supposed to just be happy that they make promises to us at all? Regardless of whether they keep them?

Violence is spiraling out of control. They should be passing gun control or at a minimum, enforcing the laws already on the books. They are doing neither. I don't need politicians to be an influencer class that just tells me gun control is good. They need to actually do their jobs and pass the laws, oversee the enforcement, appropriate funding, etc.


The goal posts have moved since a couple of hours ago when a PP said, "No one is attempting to pass gun control legislation at the federal level. Not the GOP, and not the Democrats." This is just false. If a person doesn't think the proposals are going far enough or that lawmakers are doing enough to try to get the measures passed? Fine. Say that.


None of this matters. And you are focusing on the wrong thing. And it's despicable.



Says you. Democrats are trying to enact federal gun control restrictions, and they should get credit for that. Not just lumped in with Republicans as part of a nihilistic #BothSides complaint.


They are not doing enough. They aren't doing anything that will put a serious dent in this issue. And they are super soft on crime, disdain crime victims, and pretend that we should ignore crime because somehow that will help minority communities (which is clearly false). So they aren't stopping the flow of guns AND are actively stopping the enforcement of laws. You know this is true. You just haven't let yourself accept that they gave hung us out to dry.


You are just repeating a tired partisan narrative. Democrats don’t want to ignore crime and until you can bother yourself enough to learn the true opinions of people it is useless to try to discuss anything intelligently with you.


The true opinions have been stated many times. Democrats believe we can reduce gun violence by reducing the supply of guns. Republicans believe we can reduce gun violence with aggressive policing and stronger criminal penalties. So now we have the worst of all worlds with no real gun control and no real criminal enforcement. This is not a partisan talking point. Partisans are busy explaining why it's the other party's fault. I am saying that I think there's many ways to reduce gun violence and right now, politicians are doing less than ever to reduce gun violence and the problem is escalating.
Anonymous
And another thing. You know who fixed crime before? Bill Clinton. He went tough on crime, and tough on guns. This has been done before, they just won't do it now. https://clintonwhitehouse5.archives.gov/textonly/WH/Accomplishments/eightyears-06.html
Anonymous
Does anyone have statistics on probability of one becoming a victim of random gun violence being at a wrong time in a wrong place, vs. other risks like getting killed in a car accident, from natural disaster (tornadoes, floods, fires), or from homicide as a result of robbery/burglary/sexual assault, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1131259.page


Conservative America has far more gun deaths than liberal America, study finds

A comprehensive new study breaks down how firearm deaths correlate to pro- or anti-gun control politics

A horrific recent trend of mass shootings has severely polarized Americans on the topic of firearms. At the center of this heated controversy lies the policy question of gun control: Should the government impose restrictions on firearms and other dangerous weapons to protect the public?

Conservatives turn to the Second Amendment to argue that the Constitution's right to bear arms is sacred; liberals will argue that conservatives are misinterpreting the Second Amendment and that gun control policies have been proven to save lives. The conservative rejoinder to gun control, of course, is that good people with guns can protect the public from bad people with guns.

Yet several recent studies have revealed the exact opposite: In regions dominated by pro-gun politicians, the number of gun deaths is far higher than in areas controlled by pro-gun control politicians.


[...]

More:
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/01/conservative...america-study-finds/


You ever look at the breakdown of who is dying in conservative states?



Along what lines/categories?



Age/racial demographics.

If you did, you would see that in red states, most of the firearms deaths for whites are among older males as suicides'. Most of the firearms deaths overall are younger black males are homicides, at 10-20x the rate of their white peers.

It's a social justice issue that transcends which party is in power and which state you are in.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have statistics on probability of one becoming a victim of random gun violence being at a wrong time in a wrong place, vs. other risks like getting killed in a car accident, from natural disaster (tornadoes, floods, fires), or from homicide as a result of robbery/burglary/sexual assault, etc.


https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-injuries/preventable-death-overview/odds-of-dying/

Injury Facts

PREVENTABLE DEATHS
Odds of Dying
Brief
Data Details
Your odds of dying from an accidental opioid overdose continue to be greater than dying in a
motor-vehicle crash
Fear is natural and healthy. It can help us respond to danger more quickly or avoid a dangerous situation altogether. It can also cause us to worry about the wrong things, especially when it comes to estimating our level of risk.

If we overestimate our risk in one area, it can lead to anxiety and interfere with carrying out our normal daily routine. Ironically, it also leads us to underestimate real risks that can injure or kill us.

It can be difficult to accurately assess the biggest risks we face. Plane crashes, being struck by lightning, or being attacked by a dog are common fears, but what about falls, the danger inside a bottle of pills, or your drive to work?

Knowing the odds is the first step in beating them. View the video for the latest odds of dying estimates. A summary table of some of the top causes of death is also provided. Please use the data details tab to explore all the odds of dying estimates.

Lifetime odds of death for selected causes, United States, 2021
Cause of Death Odds of Dying
Heart disease 1 in 6
Cancer 1 in 7
COVID-19 1 in 10
All preventable causes of death 1 in 19
Chronic lower respiratory disease 1 in 31
Opioid overdose (accidental) 1 in 58
Guns (all intents) 1 in 89
Gun assault 1 in 208

Accidental gun discharge 1 in 7,944
Suicide 1 in 91
Motor-vehicle crash 1 in 93
Fall 1 in 98
Pedestrian incident 1 in 485
Motorcyclist 1 in 747
Drowning 1 in 1,006
Fire or smoke 1 in 1,287
Choking on food 1 in 2,659
Bicyclist 1 in 3,546
Sunstroke 1 in 4,655
Electrocution, radiation, extreme temperatures, and pressure 1 in 13,176
Cataclysmic storm 1 in 20,098
Sharp objects 1 in 25,960
Hot surfaces and substances 1 in 45,908
Dog attack 1 in 53,843
Hornet, wasp, and bee stings 1 in 54,516
Lightning Too few deaths in 2021 to calculate odds
Railway passenger Too few deaths in 2021 to calculate odds
Passenger on an airplane Too few deaths in 2021 to calculate odds
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1131259.page


Conservative America has far more gun deaths than liberal America, study finds

A comprehensive new study breaks down how firearm deaths correlate to pro- or anti-gun control politics

A horrific recent trend of mass shootings has severely polarized Americans on the topic of firearms. At the center of this heated controversy lies the policy question of gun control: Should the government impose restrictions on firearms and other dangerous weapons to protect the public?

Conservatives turn to the Second Amendment to argue that the Constitution's right to bear arms is sacred; liberals will argue that conservatives are misinterpreting the Second Amendment and that gun control policies have been proven to save lives. The conservative rejoinder to gun control, of course, is that good people with guns can protect the public from bad people with guns.

Yet several recent studies have revealed the exact opposite: In regions dominated by pro-gun politicians, the number of gun deaths is far higher than in areas controlled by pro-gun control politicians.


[...]

More:
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/01/conservative...america-study-finds/


You ever look at the breakdown of who is dying in conservative states?



Along what lines/categories?



Age/racial demographics.

If you did, you would see that in red states, most of the firearms deaths for whites are among older males as suicides'. Most of the firearms deaths overall are younger black males are homicides, at 10-20x the rate of their white peers.

It's a social justice issue that transcends which party is in power and which state you are in.


Red state citizens - regardless of demographic or wealth lines - die at higher rates and earlier than their counterparts in Blue states. Pretty much all of the negative trends are more pronounced in Republican run states.

If you’re a white wealthy guy in Alabama, you’re more likely to die young or violently than a white wealthy guy in Scarsdale. White women giving birth in Alabama have a higher infant mortality rate than their white counterparts in Massachusetts.

No one is impressed by white Alabamans who say “yeah, well the black guy across town is worse off than me!”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have statistics on probability of one becoming a victim of random gun violence being at a wrong time in a wrong place, vs. other risks like getting killed in a car accident, from natural disaster (tornadoes, floods, fires), or from homicide as a result of robbery/burglary/sexual assault, etc.


https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-injuries/preventable-death-overview/odds-of-dying/

Injury Facts

PREVENTABLE DEATHS
Odds of Dying
Brief
Data Details
Your odds of dying from an accidental opioid overdose continue to be greater than dying in a
motor-vehicle crash
Fear is natural and healthy. It can help us respond to danger more quickly or avoid a dangerous situation altogether. It can also cause us to worry about the wrong things, especially when it comes to estimating our level of risk.

If we overestimate our risk in one area, it can lead to anxiety and interfere with carrying out our normal daily routine. Ironically, it also leads us to underestimate real risks that can injure or kill us.

It can be difficult to accurately assess the biggest risks we face. Plane crashes, being struck by lightning, or being attacked by a dog are common fears, but what about falls, the danger inside a bottle of pills, or your drive to work?

Knowing the odds is the first step in beating them. View the video for the latest odds of dying estimates. A summary table of some of the top causes of death is also provided. Please use the data details tab to explore all the odds of dying estimates.

Lifetime odds of death for selected causes, United States, 2021
Cause of Death Odds of Dying
Heart disease 1 in 6
Cancer 1 in 7
COVID-19 1 in 10
All preventable causes of death 1 in 19
Chronic lower respiratory disease 1 in 31
Opioid overdose (accidental) 1 in 58
Guns (all intents) 1 in 89
Gun assault 1 in 208

Accidental gun discharge 1 in 7,944
Suicide 1 in 91
Motor-vehicle crash 1 in 93
Fall 1 in 98
Pedestrian incident 1 in 485
Motorcyclist 1 in 747
Drowning 1 in 1,006
Fire or smoke 1 in 1,287
Choking on food 1 in 2,659
Bicyclist 1 in 3,546
Sunstroke 1 in 4,655
Electrocution, radiation, extreme temperatures, and pressure 1 in 13,176
Cataclysmic storm 1 in 20,098
Sharp objects 1 in 25,960
Hot surfaces and substances 1 in 45,908
Dog attack 1 in 53,843
Hornet, wasp, and bee stings 1 in 54,516
Lightning Too few deaths in 2021 to calculate odds
Railway passenger Too few deaths in 2021 to calculate odds
Passenger on an airplane Too few deaths in 2021 to calculate odds


These are kind of interesting but also misleading. Presumably the statistical rate is calculated on the basis of the entire population which is fine for choking and motor vehicles. But a very small subset rides motorbikes and bikes, for example, and so a rate based on the entire population vastly underestimates the risk for people who actually do engage in those activities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Plenty of nonwhite men involved in gun violence. We can quibble over the threshold for “mass shooting” and whether those are predominantly a white male phenomenon.

But I think we can all agree it’s almost always males doing the killing. What sickness has taken hold of American men?


A lot if our men have everything in common with the Taliban. Few things are more dangerous than lost, uneducated, bored, unskilled, hopeless men age 18-40 in a culture that perpetuates unhealthy ideas of what masculine is.

We have a gun problem. And we have a man problem.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1131259.page


Conservative America has far more gun deaths than liberal America, study finds

A comprehensive new study breaks down how firearm deaths correlate to pro- or anti-gun control politics

A horrific recent trend of mass shootings has severely polarized Americans on the topic of firearms. At the center of this heated controversy lies the policy question of gun control: Should the government impose restrictions on firearms and other dangerous weapons to protect the public?

Conservatives turn to the Second Amendment to argue that the Constitution's right to bear arms is sacred; liberals will argue that conservatives are misinterpreting the Second Amendment and that gun control policies have been proven to save lives. The conservative rejoinder to gun control, of course, is that good people with guns can protect the public from bad people with guns.

Yet several recent studies have revealed the exact opposite: In regions dominated by pro-gun politicians, the number of gun deaths is far higher than in areas controlled by pro-gun control politicians.


[...]

More:
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/01/conservative...america-study-finds/


You ever look at the breakdown of who is dying in conservative states?



Along what lines/categories?



Age/racial demographics.

If you did, you would see that in red states, most of the firearms deaths for whites are among older males as suicides'. Most of the firearms deaths overall are younger black males are homicides, at 10-20x the rate of their white peers.

It's a social justice issue that transcends which party is in power and which state you are in.


Red state citizens - regardless of demographic or wealth lines - die at higher rates and earlier than their counterparts in Blue states. Pretty much all of the negative trends are more pronounced in Republican run states.

If you’re a white wealthy guy in Alabama, you’re more likely to die young or violently than a white wealthy guy in Scarsdale. White women giving birth in Alabama have a higher infant mortality rate than their white counterparts in Massachusetts.

No one is impressed by white Alabamans who say “yeah, well the black guy across town is worse off than me!”


You're focusing on the wrong thing.

When the same thing occurs in red or blue states among the same group, then that it is not the Rs nor the D's that are providing solutions. Either both the R's and the D's are deliberately discriminating against them in some way, the solutions they provide simply don't work, or that demographic has some unique cultural feature. It's a hot potato that no one wants to address.

Over police that group, you run into problems.
Neglect that group, you into problems.
Pass more laws, you don't solve the problems.
Throw more cash into services, you don't solve the problems.

Hence nothing changes.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: