Girls Academy Showcase

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

It's called very poor coaching. If you have good players and lose games - it's all coaching.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

It's called very poor coaching. If you have good players and lose games - it's all coaching.

This is their last trip to California, I’m sure the players and families were just enjoying their couple of days out there. I would say this about any U19 team. It is over for them and meaningless. It is very natural for everyone to have turned the page.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

It's called very poor coaching. If you have good players and lose games - it's all coaching.

This is their last trip to California, I’m sure the players and families were just enjoying their couple of days out there. I would say this about any U19 team. It is over for them and meaningless. It is very natural for everyone to have turned the page.

Besides the fact that they're trying to win a national championship

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

It's called very poor coaching. If you have good players and lose games - it's all coaching.

This is their last trip to California, I’m sure the players and families were just enjoying their couple of days out there. I would say this about any U19 team. It is over for them and meaningless. It is very natural for everyone to have turned the page.

Besides the fact that they're trying to win a national championship

This wasn’t part of the “National Championship” though. Different things. Champions League is just a mini club to club tournament.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

How about the performance of the club across all of the age groups? Mediocre

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

How about the performance of the club across all of the age groups? Mediocre

Goodbye, nice to know you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another domination by FCV across all age groups. It's clear that FCV would dominate ECNL if let in.

FCV 09 - 1-1-1
FCV 08 - 1-2
FCV 07 - 1-1-1
FCV 06 - 3-0
FCV 05 - 2-1
FCV 04 - 0-1-2

FCV - 8-6-4

6 age groups and only two left California with a winning record.

Why does the club or team record matter? The point of these events is to give players exposure. College coaches were there to see specific players and don't care who wins the games. Why do you care so much who wins?

They were playing the in the champions league - it counted

Even in the ECNL - showcase go to overall rankings for playoffs

It's a misconception that showcase games are just for showcasing

Poor showing for fcv 04.

04's are already committed to colleges. Many do not want to travel to CA for these games

They all went - and who cares

nope, 3 kids did not go.

Let's play a game - how many were not the core 11 that are part of the starting lineup

2 - goalie and forward

Well - guess the team can't perform without them (that's the assertion - correct?)

The assertion is that FCV is all hype and no substance. I admit that they are probably a mid ECNL level team across all age groups. But not anything special as this showcase confirms. On par for BP and his clubs.

The performance of a team full of committed seniors is not indicative of the quality of the club. The lackluster performance of the younger age groups is more of a concern, especially factoring the general lower level of competition in GA overall as well as the outlook of the league in general.

How about the performance of the club across all of the age groups? Mediocre

Goodbye, nice to know you.

Truth cuts deeps. This is just FCV evolving back into an average club building out South teams solely to bring in income as they are not geographically positioned well to be a feeder to GA teams, which are losing ground quickly to ECNL teams. Loudoun will take over with the large income base from rec teams + feeder pipeline + ecnl. The 09 team is insight into the future.