Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

I saw the reason he was there is a group was staying at a home rented before the divorce. That is Kevin’s people on the or attack. She is still doing a healthy thing leaving him because he is vicious and controlling. The kids will definitely see a step down 50 percent of time and the oldest will know it is dad’s doing. I think she couldn’t take him anymore because if she was a gold digger she would be happy he is never there. She wanted a real marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw the reason he was there is a group was staying at a home rented before the divorce. That is Kevin’s people on the or attack. She is still doing a healthy thing leaving him because he is vicious and controlling. The kids will definitely see a step down 50 percent of time and the oldest will know it is dad’s doing. I think she couldn’t take him anymore because if she was a gold digger she would be happy he is never there. She wanted a real marriage.

Is he the same guy who was staying at their guesthouse? The one she allegedly had the affair with. Borrowing money from your husband’s friend seems is a big no for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

She obviously signed it so he would go ahead and marry her and she could benefit from his lifestyle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There was an article about how the kids live and omg. The 15 yr old has his own boat. They have speakers in their trees on their property. They live like kings. If you factor in cost of school, they prob do need a zillion to live monthly. If not, still a steep price to continue their lifestyle.

I agree that she's asking for a crazy amount but you know their lifestyle differs from ours. To these people 100k is nothing. Their property rents out at $50k/wk. so you know..

I agree with PP that both are bad here because no 15 yr old should live like that! As a parent, it's irresponsible to have your kid know nothing about the value of material goods.

.

But there is no guarantee a lifestyle stays at the level. Even regular people face lifestyle changes when an income drops.

The kids (with proper counseling) will be fine living two different lifestyles. They will still be top of the food chain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

I got married the same year she did. It was not that much money (to sustain someone indefinitely!) even then.

I think she was a fool to leave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

I got married the same year she did. It was not that much money (to sustain someone indefinitely!) even then.

I think she was a fool to leave.

She said she was lonely. I think she wanted to leave and find somebody else but maintain the same lifestyle she had with him using money she gets from him.

She’s not very smart; he paid his first wife $80m and went at great lengths to protect himself. He didn’t want to remarry but she threatened to leave if he didn’t so he did but used an ironclad prenup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

Her lawyers are stretching it out, more billable hours. She's a dream client.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

I got married the same year she did. It was not that much money (to sustain someone indefinitely!) even then.

I think she was a fool to leave.

Kevin was planning to file, she just beat him to it. She wasn’t going to remain Mrs. Costner either way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

I got married the same year she did. It was not that much money (to sustain someone indefinitely!) even then.

I think she was a fool to leave.

She said she was lonely. I think she wanted to leave and find somebody else but maintain the same lifestyle she had with him using money she gets from him.

She’s not very smart; he paid his first wife $80m and went at great lengths to protect himself. He didn’t want to remarry but she threatened to leave if he didn’t so he did but used an ironclad prenup.

How is $1.5m ironclad when he is so wealthy. I’m really curious to see how this will be viewed by the courts. Or maybe they’ll just negotiate something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

I got married the same year she did. It was not that much money (to sustain someone indefinitely!) even then.

I think she was a fool to leave.

She said she was lonely. I think she wanted to leave and find somebody else but maintain the same lifestyle she had with him using money she gets from him.

She’s not very smart; he paid his first wife $80m and went at great lengths to protect himself. He didn’t want to remarry but she threatened to leave if he didn’t so he did but used an ironclad prenup.

How is $1.5m ironclad when he is so wealthy. I’m really curious to see how this will be viewed by the courts. Or maybe they’ll just negotiate something.

The prenup has been upheld thus far which is a good indication that it will continue to be. She lost the battle on not leaving the house and on taking items from the house that were not her personal property. She also rejected his prior settlement offers. This woman is a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

This. I think she’s probably not very smart (which is what he liked about her because he seems like that type of guy) and it doesn’t doesn’t help her be her own advocate. He’s always seemed like a douche to me, and she seems like a fool, yes. Signing a pre-nip that only promised 1 million, even back then, was a ridiculously low amount, and then now trying to get it thrown out.

Her life was simpler then so she probably thought it was a lot on money. Guess she never heard about inflation.

I got married the same year she did. It was not that much money (to sustain someone indefinitely!) even then.

I think she was a fool to leave.

Kevin was planning to file, she just beat him to it. She wasn’t going to remain Mrs. Costner either way.

I didn’t know that. What are,the details?

[Anonymous]

I don’t have sympathy for either of them, nor their kids. The details for their lifestyle are sickening - a window into the ‘elite’ way of life that is destroying the planet, and all so selfish despite having so much. Where is the evidence of years of time and money invested in philanthropy?

Disgusting. I hope they all live miserably ever after.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t have sympathy for either of them, nor their kids. The details for their lifestyle are sickening - a window into the ‘elite’ way of life that is destroying the planet, and all so selfish despite having so much. Where is the evidence of years of time and money invested in philanthropy?

Disgusting. I hope they all live miserably ever after.

Christine going on the stand and crying because she is going to miss the lifestyle was so gross. They have live animals for the nativity scene, 10 camps in the backyard for the kids for a birthday party and bringing in snow every Christmas was so tasteless; I can’t stand that obnoxious display of wealth. The kids are still innocent though but they are likely to replicate how their parents lived.