Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

“Luxury is in their DNA.” One of the stupidest statements from Christine’s camp.

[Anonymous]

The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her attorney says luxury is in the kids DNA so she needs $175k per month from Kevin to keep them in luxury. At this point the judge should just give custody to Kevin and let Christine figure out how to support herself.

god he is gross. She has been married almost 20 years. His continued attempts to tarnish her are horrible. He is a sad excuse for a man. And yes the kids should have a similar living experience at each home. As for Kevin getting a kids it is known that he is barely around so you shouldn’t get full custody to screw your ex out of money.

Why? Truly, I want to know. Sounds to me like the kids could benefit from a living a plain old UMC lifestyle for a bit.

DP. Because that’s not how it works. And if an UMC lifestyle was a value that the parents had they could have done that years ago but to switch living standards because the parents are divorcing isn’t something that builds character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Eh. Idk. Even at low odds of success the expected value of winning a challenge to the prenup is probably more than 1 Million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

I think she is likely also terrible with money. She borrowed 20K from her new boyfriend. She rented a 35K a month home before even knowing what all the financial details would be. I don't think she has ever managed money - just spent it. She was also upset that the divorce affected her mom as Kevin stopped giving her mom 5K a month as he has partially supported her for years.

It seems she mostly saw Kevin as a money tree and her job was to live as lavishly as possible and spend. I doubt Kevin even spends as much as she does. He seems more cautious with money, probably because he understands it's value. He wants to only take projects where he can stay at home and be a 50% parent and that means turning down bigger money that would require him to travel or be away on set. I don't think he has limitless liquid cash available each month.

[Anonymous]

What are you talking about-he is never home . The Yellowstone project was final straw. She needs better lawyers. Good for her trying to stand up for herself!!

[Anonymous]

She files for divorce because he works too much? If he works less that means less money for her to child support payments. Christine seems clueless about how money works. She reminds me of Tori Spelling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

I think she is likely also terrible with money. She borrowed 20K from her new boyfriend. She rented a 35K a month home before even knowing what all the financial details would be. I don't think she has ever managed money - just spent it. She was also upset that the divorce affected her mom as Kevin stopped giving her mom 5K a month as he has partially supported her for years.

It seems she mostly saw Kevin as a money tree and her job was to live as lavishly as possible and spend. I doubt Kevin even spends as much as she does. He seems more cautious with money, probably because he understands it's value. He wants to only take projects where he can stay at home and be a 50% parent and that means turning down bigger money that would require him to travel or be away on set. I don't think he has limitless liquid cash available each month.

I don’t like Christine but I’m not getting why people view him so positively. For one, there’s no way he only takes projects where he can stay at home as Yellowstone was not filmed near their home and he was on almost every episode. $5k/mo is barely anything at his level of wealth. I don’t think that he has to continue paying it but it seems a bit stingy. Christine probably thought that he cared for her mom and wouldn’t do that to her. Which is certainly naive but is understandable.

All these posts about how Christine was dumb and wasteful and a gold digger but at the end of the day Kevin chose to marry her which speaks to his own values. He apparently thought that Christine was mother material for his children so either he is just as stupid as she is or was perfectly fine with their transactional relationship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. So this ended up just like Kelly Clarkson’s divorce. Judge initially awards a large amount in temporary support and then reduces it to a more appropriate amount. I know several of us said this would happen and there was quite the uproar in opposition.

Hopefully Christine is smart enough to stop pursuing challenging the prenup before she loses that money too. She should direct her rage at the legal team that advised her so poorly 20 years ago and have been advising her the last 6 months.

Do you really think her legal team advised her poorly? So, her lawyer when she was 30 and signed the pre-nup was super incompetent, and her legal team now is super incompetent. And all those years of being married to Kevin, she had super incompetent financial advisors, lawyers, advisors and whoever else. Nah, this woman is the fool and the more she fights and whines about it, the more it shows.

I think her current lawyer is a fool to think they could challenge Laura Wasser and actually win.

Or her current lawyer just happens to have a fool for a client.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

I think she is likely also terrible with money. She borrowed 20K from her new boyfriend. She rented a 35K a month home before even knowing what all the financial details would be. I don't think she has ever managed money - just spent it. She was also upset that the divorce affected her mom as Kevin stopped giving her mom 5K a month as he has partially supported her for years.

It seems she mostly saw Kevin as a money tree and her job was to live as lavishly as possible and spend. I doubt Kevin even spends as much as she does. He seems more cautious with money, probably because he understands it's value. He wants to only take projects where he can stay at home and be a 50% parent and that means turning down bigger money that would require him to travel or be away on set. I don't think he has limitless liquid cash available each month.

I don’t like Christine but I’m not getting why people view him so positively. For one, there’s no way he only takes projects where he can stay at home as Yellowstone was not filmed near their home and he was on almost every episode. $5k/mo is barely anything at his level of wealth. I don’t think that he has to continue paying it but it seems a bit stingy. Christine probably thought that he cared for her mom and wouldn’t do that to her. Which is certainly naive but is understandable.

All these posts about how Christine was dumb and wasteful and a gold digger but at the end of the day Kevin chose to marry her which speaks to his own values. He apparently thought that Christine was mother material for his children so either he is just as stupid as she is or was perfectly fine with their transactional relationship.

Sorry, it wasn't clear - he said that going forward he doesn't want to take projects that keep him away from home. However it wasn't like Christine was tied to the home and children when he was away, she had a nanny and later a household manager who looked after the children and all their activities, someone who did all the cleaning, a chef who did all the shopping and cooking etc.

Caring isn't determined by how much someone spends on you. Christine could have easily worked and helped her mother out. I don't really think of Kevin positively except in this court case, I am on his side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

I think she is likely also terrible with money. She borrowed 20K from her new boyfriend. She rented a 35K a month home before even knowing what all the financial details would be. I don't think she has ever managed money - just spent it. She was also upset that the divorce affected her mom as Kevin stopped giving her mom 5K a month as he has partially supported her for years.

It seems she mostly saw Kevin as a money tree and her job was to live as lavishly as possible and spend. I doubt Kevin even spends as much as she does. He seems more cautious with money, probably because he understands it's value. He wants to only take projects where he can stay at home and be a 50% parent and that means turning down bigger money that would require him to travel or be away on set. I don't think he has limitless liquid cash available each month.

I don’t like Christine but I’m not getting why people view him so positively. For one, there’s no way he only takes projects where he can stay at home as Yellowstone was not filmed near their home and he was on almost every episode. $5k/mo is barely anything at his level of wealth. I don’t think that he has to continue paying it but it seems a bit stingy. Christine probably thought that he cared for her mom and wouldn’t do that to her. Which is certainly naive but is understandable.

All these posts about how Christine was dumb and wasteful and a gold digger but at the end of the day Kevin chose to marry her which speaks to his own values. He apparently thought that Christine was mother material for his children so either he is just as stupid as she is or was perfectly fine with their transactional relationship.

Is it understandable, though? I'm no Kevin Costner fan, but Christine filed for divorce. Why would he continue to pay her mother a monthly stipend? And the People article mentions she has a boyfriend. I don't know if that's true, but Kevin shouldn't have to fund her life and especially not her new life with her new beau.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

I think she is likely also terrible with money. She borrowed 20K from her new boyfriend. She rented a 35K a month home before even knowing what all the financial details would be. I don't think she has ever managed money - just spent it. She was also upset that the divorce affected her mom as Kevin stopped giving her mom 5K a month as he has partially supported her for years.

It seems she mostly saw Kevin as a money tree and her job was to live as lavishly as possible and spend. I doubt Kevin even spends as much as she does. He seems more cautious with money, probably because he understands it's value. He wants to only take projects where he can stay at home and be a 50% parent and that means turning down bigger money that would require him to travel or be away on set. I don't think he has limitless liquid cash available each month.

I don’t like Christine but I’m not getting why people view him so positively. For one, there’s no way he only takes projects where he can stay at home as Yellowstone was not filmed near their home and he was on almost every episode. $5k/mo is barely anything at his level of wealth. I don’t think that he has to continue paying it but it seems a bit stingy. Christine probably thought that he cared for her mom and wouldn’t do that to her. Which is certainly naive but is understandable.

All these posts about how Christine was dumb and wasteful and a gold digger but at the end of the day Kevin chose to marry her which speaks to his own values. He apparently thought that Christine was mother material for his children so either he is just as stupid as she is or was perfectly fine with their transactional relationship.

That’s some hubris to expect the man she is divorcing to continue paying her mom $5k monthly. I guess the transactional relationship works when both play their role. She seems to have filed because she was lonely, he is gone all the time earning money to support her lifestyle. This whole thing was so poorly thought out by her..it’s like she filed and expected him to just give her whatever she requested in the filing; she is stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trial for spousal support and to challenge the pre nip is set for November.

Hopefully she learned something from the child support case.

If she did, she would withdraw her petition to challenge the prenup before she loses her 1M and has to pay his legal fees.

Is her legal team advising her at all? I just feel that this is all Christine, she don’t seem smart. I’m not surprised she signed that prenup. She probably end up having to pay his legal fees and get just $63k per month, out of which she has to pay half of the kids expenses.

I think she is likely also terrible with money. She borrowed 20K from her new boyfriend. She rented a 35K a month home before even knowing what all the financial details would be. I don't think she has ever managed money - just spent it. She was also upset that the divorce affected her mom as Kevin stopped giving her mom 5K a month as he has partially supported her for years.

It seems she mostly saw Kevin as a money tree and her job was to live as lavishly as possible and spend. I doubt Kevin even spends as much as she does. He seems more cautious with money, probably because he understands it's value. He wants to only take projects where he can stay at home and be a 50% parent and that means turning down bigger money that would require him to travel or be away on set. I don't think he has limitless liquid cash available each month.

I don’t like Christine but I’m not getting why people view him so positively. For one, there’s no way he only takes projects where he can stay at home as Yellowstone was not filmed near their home and he was on almost every episode. $5k/mo is barely anything at his level of wealth. I don’t think that he has to continue paying it but it seems a bit stingy. Christine probably thought that he cared for her mom and wouldn’t do that to her. Which is certainly naive but is understandable.

All these posts about how Christine was dumb and wasteful and a gold digger but at the end of the day Kevin chose to marry her which speaks to his own values. He apparently thought that Christine was mother material for his children so either he is just as stupid as she is or was perfectly fine with their transactional relationship.

Is it understandable, though? I'm no Kevin Costner fan, but Christine filed for divorce. Why would he continue to pay her mother a monthly stipend? And the People article mentions she has a boyfriend. I don't know if that's true, but Kevin shouldn't have to fund her life and especially not her new life with her new beau.

The guy is Kevin’s friend, he was with her in Hawaii; she say he is not her boyfriend but he loaned her $20k.