School Shooting in Michigan. 3 Teens DEAD. 1 15-yr old suspect in custody.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, this thread is insane.

How so? Would you like to define the boy? His parents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at the faces of these shooters - they look subhuman, crazy and low IQ. As if they were casted in these roles by some Hollywood casting director. With dead, crazy, Sanpaku eyes too...

Really? He looks like any other 15 year old. There is nothing to indicate he is low IQ. You cannot tell that from a mug shot.
What he did was horrific but walking around judging people as subhuman, low IQ, and crazy by their appearance is awful.

No, he doesn't look like any other 15 yr old. He looks like a criminal and low IQ man. You put him in a suit and he will still looks criminal. Maybe he is poor and that shows in his appearance too. But you can look at rich, depraved criminal men, and while they will look expensively attired and entitled...their criminality also shows on their faces. Especially the eyes. This looks like an evil man and his parents also look evil.

He is still a 15 year old CHILD.

He's not being charged as a CHILD and rightly so.

+1

There are facial deformities that connect to mental illness.

Interesting. Can you share more about this? If this is true, I wonder if this is some of the subtle things our guts are telling us when they subconsciously warn us about someone.

The amount of ignorance and misogyny being spread in this post is disgusting. PP you are an uneducated dunce.

Honestly, he looks like every other teenage boy. This age is filled with arrogance and eye rolling. I’ve seen the same look on my son’s face when I get on him to finish chores. Or the teenagers on his soccer team when I tell them to pick up all the cones after practice. I know they are really thinking “leave me the f alone”, but they do what they are told. You can’t tell “low IQ” or anything.

This is no eyeroll.

Everyone looks "off" in a mug shot. Regardless of what puts them in that situation-- big crime or small, chronic offender or one-off bad act-- they are generally freaked out and exhausted. It's silly to read anything into this photo. We have plenty of other info about this kid to consider and judge.

And facial deformity PP-- You have a toe on a slippery slope to eugenics.

Don’t speak about things you don’t understand. I know you are proud of yourself for using eugenics in a sentence but certain facial features are associated with FAS. Not well educated enough myself to know if that is what he presents as but previous posters noting that is not out of bounds.

I know what eugenics is. My point was that you might lead the discussion into territory where people make assumptions about personal attributes based on measurements/size of facial/cranial features, hence "a toe on a slippery slope." Not saying that's your intention. There's a lot of crazy conjecture on this thread already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, this thread is insane.

How so? Would you like to define the boy? His parents?

The abundance of bizarre speculation. Opioids? FAS? Drug dealers? What is the point in engaging in uninformed speculation? This is a tragedy and yet you imbeciles are treating it like a game of gossip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That kid wasn’t bullied. He was probably ignored and ostracized because kids can TELL when someone is “off.” They can’t verbalize why but they know the dangerous kids and they avoid them for self preservation. These kids aren’t bullied. They ARE the bullies.

His parents will probably blame: screens, school closures, bullying, CRT. It’s just their kid. And them.

-high school teacher

I was bullied a lot in middle and high school. Kids ripped up my books, cut my hair, punched, sexually abused me, and more. Teachers saw it happen but they were buddy-buddy with the cool kids and didn’t want to risk their relationships that made them, the adult, feel cool. So no one ever did anything.

I wouldn’t ever trust a teacher to know or be honest about who is a bully.

This is absolutely true. Teachers always seem to gravitate to and support the popular kids who are often the worst bullies. I have a kid with disabilities who has no behaviour problems but because he was slightly different he was bullied by so many kids and I was there at one event where 5 teachers were standing around as he was being bullied by 2 kids and everyone of them ignored it. All the talk the schools say about bullying is bs. I've never seen one school do anything meaningful about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That kid wasn’t bullied. He was probably ignored and ostracized because kids can TELL when someone is “off.” They can’t verbalize why but they know the dangerous kids and they avoid them for self preservation. These kids aren’t bullied. They ARE the bullies.

His parents will probably blame: screens, school closures, bullying, CRT. It’s just their kid. And them.

-high school teacher

I was bullied a lot in middle and high school. Kids ripped up my books, cut my hair, punched, sexually abused me, and more. Teachers saw it happen but they were buddy-buddy with the cool kids and didn’t want to risk their relationships that made them, the adult, feel cool. So no one ever did anything.

I wouldn’t ever trust a teacher to know or be honest about who is a bully.

But you didn’t shoot up a school. I’m not here to discuss your trauma or issue with teachers . I’m here to dispel the myth that school shooters are bullied. They’re not. They’re sociopaths and kids know it in their gut and avoid them.

Idiotic, meaningless generalization.

A+100. Most people wouldn't recognize a sociopath until the shoot or stab them. Kids who are harmless but different are more likely to be identified as dangerous even if they aren't. This is all a lot of bullsh*t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The child had explosive anger issues, and he was radicalized at home. His parents may not have been DC wealthy, but they were rich enough to buy him a $1K gun for Christmas. Let's put the blame where it goes here.

Where is the evidence that the kid had explosive anger issues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The child had explosive anger issues, and he was radicalized at home. His parents may not have been DC wealthy, but they were rich enough to buy him a $1K gun for Christmas. Let's put the blame where it goes here.

Where is the evidence that the kid had explosive anger issues?

I assume you mean prior to shooting up his school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That kid wasn’t bullied. He was probably ignored and ostracized because kids can TELL when someone is “off.” They can’t verbalize why but they know the dangerous kids and they avoid them for self preservation. These kids aren’t bullied. They ARE the bullies.

His parents will probably blame: screens, school closures, bullying, CRT. It’s just their kid. And them.

-high school teacher

I was bullied a lot in middle and high school. Kids ripped up my books, cut my hair, punched, sexually abused me, and more. Teachers saw it happen but they were buddy-buddy with the cool kids and didn’t want to risk their relationships that made them, the adult, feel cool. So no one ever did anything.

I wouldn’t ever trust a teacher to know or be honest about who is a bully.

But you didn’t shoot up a school. I’m not here to discuss your trauma or issue with teachers . I’m here to dispel the myth that school shooters are bullied. They’re not. They’re sociopaths and kids know it in their gut and avoid them.

Idiotic, meaningless generalization.

A+100. Most people wouldn't recognize a sociopath until the shoot or stab them. Kids who are harmless but different are more likely to be identified as dangerous even if they aren't. This is all a lot of bullsh*t.

Wrong. Different kids are bullied, yes. Dangerous kids are not and your brain knows the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The child had explosive anger issues, and he was radicalized at home. His parents may not have been DC wealthy, but they were rich enough to buy him a $1K gun for Christmas. Let's put the blame where it goes here.

Where is the evidence that the kid had explosive anger issues?

Ya really think he didn't??????

This is not about you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That kid wasn’t bullied. He was probably ignored and ostracized because kids can TELL when someone is “off.” They can’t verbalize why but they know the dangerous kids and they avoid them for self preservation. These kids aren’t bullied. They ARE the bullies.

His parents will probably blame: screens, school closures, bullying, CRT. It’s just their kid. And them.

-high school teacher

I was bullied a lot in middle and high school. Kids ripped up my books, cut my hair, punched, sexually abused me, and more. Teachers saw it happen but they were buddy-buddy with the cool kids and didn’t want to risk their relationships that made them, the adult, feel cool. So no one ever did anything.

I wouldn’t ever trust a teacher to know or be honest about who is a bully.

This is absolutely true. Teachers always seem to gravitate to and support the popular kids who are often the worst bullies. I have a kid with disabilities who has no behaviour problems but because he was slightly different he was bullied by so many kids and I was there at one event where 5 teachers were standing around as he was being bullied by 2 kids and everyone of them ignored it. All the talk the schools say about bullying is bs. I've never seen one school do anything meaningful about it.

This! I was also bullied a lot throughout school. I will never forget an incident in 6th grade where the big fat teacher actually joined in with the kids on bullying me. Maybe some of these teachers were bullied as kids and perhaps feel like they get retribution from allowing the bullying to occur.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That kid wasn’t bullied. He was probably ignored and ostracized because kids can TELL when someone is “off.” They can’t verbalize why but they know the dangerous kids and they avoid them for self preservation. These kids aren’t bullied. They ARE the bullies.

His parents will probably blame: screens, school closures, bullying, CRT. It’s just their kid. And them.

-high school teacher

I was bullied a lot in middle and high school. Kids ripped up my books, cut my hair, punched, sexually abused me, and more. Teachers saw it happen but they were buddy-buddy with the cool kids and didn’t want to risk their relationships that made them, the adult, feel cool. So no one ever did anything.

I wouldn’t ever trust a teacher to know or be honest about who is a bully.

But you didn’t shoot up a school. I’m not here to discuss your trauma or issue with teachers . I’m here to dispel the myth that school shooters are bullied. They’re not. They’re sociopaths and kids know it in their gut and avoid them.

Idiotic, meaningless generalization.

A+100. Most people wouldn't recognize a sociopath until the shoot or stab them. Kids who are harmless but different are more likely to be identified as dangerous even if they aren't. This is all a lot of bullsh*t.

Wrong. Different kids are bullied, yes. Dangerous kids are not and your brain knows the difference.

+1

Once again, this is not about you other PP. Get your head on straight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That kid wasn’t bullied. He was probably ignored and ostracized because kids can TELL when someone is “off.” They can’t verbalize why but they know the dangerous kids and they avoid them for self preservation. These kids aren’t bullied. They ARE the bullies.

His parents will probably blame: screens, school closures, bullying, CRT. It’s just their kid. And them.

-high school teacher

I was bullied a lot in middle and high school. Kids ripped up my books, cut my hair, punched, sexually abused me, and more. Teachers saw it happen but they were buddy-buddy with the cool kids and didn’t want to risk their relationships that made them, the adult, feel cool. So no one ever did anything.

I wouldn’t ever trust a teacher to know or be honest about who is a bully.

This is absolutely true. Teachers always seem to gravitate to and support the popular kids who are often the worst bullies. I have a kid with disabilities who has no behaviour problems but because he was slightly different he was bullied by so many kids and I was there at one event where 5 teachers were standing around as he was being bullied by 2 kids and everyone of them ignored it. All the talk the schools say about bullying is bs. I've never seen one school do anything meaningful about it.

This! I was also bullied a lot throughout school. I will never forget an incident in 6th grade where the big fat teacher actually joined in with the kids on bullying me. Maybe some of these teachers were bullied as kids and perhaps feel like they get retribution from allowing the bullying to occur.

Bullying does happen. But that is not what this thread (or this shooting) is about.

[Anonymous]

People, rich kids shoot up schools too. The Columbine kids and Adam Lanza were all upper middle class.

[Anonymous]

Why are people saying “call the police”? There was literally a resource officer full time in that school! A sheriff’s deputy. It’s a 2,000 student high school. They didn’t even loop that cop into this! Everyone running that school are six-figure morons. And now just this week, there was a “dark cloud” hanging over the school all semester. Bunch of idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People, rich kids shoot up schools too. The Columbine kids and Adam Lanza were all upper middle class.

People like to forgot that Marjory Stoneman Douglas, the worst mass shooting in a school outside of Sandy Hook, was done in a school district with a $5.4 billion annual budget. The top school district in Florida in fact.