Duh. I mean, both people need to be on board. If your spouse says they don't want to be the sole breadwinner and you quit your job anyway, what do you think is going to happen? THAT is childish and entitled. |
| The funny thing is should the husband decided divorce will make the 'partner' listen, those women will have to go right back where they started - to get a job. |
OK! This is why people think you sound childish. NOTHING you have written suggests that you have a real partnership with your husband. You assume all kinds of stuff about him, because you are just so sensitive, but you aren't talking directly with him about this. You discount his actual concerns, again, without talking to him. And you are basically thinking that the mature, sensible reaction here is to not have a kid, again, without talking to him. Cutting off your nose to spite your face. |
To be fair to OP's husband, we don't know that he's "all about the ultimatums," because OP hasn't actually talking about any of this with him. This is just what she thinks he thinks, but they apparently don't communicate directly about this stuff. |
NP. So why don't you quit your job and contribute the equivalent of your annual pay to the household, from your high net worth? Or ask your parents to give you that amount every year from your expected inheritance. Then you can still contribute financially, and stay home. You weren't counting husband's income in your high net worth, were you? That's HIS high net worth. |
| Did you not discuss the SAHM possibility prior to marrying him? If not, then you’re basically blindsiding him. He agreed to marry a lawyer, presumably with high earning potential. Your definition of “enough money” doesn’t match his. Again, another conversation that should’ve happened before marriage. Discussing and agreeing together not to have a second child would be a compromise. Making the decision in anger to punish him for not agreeing with you is childish. Good luck. |
| Two kids two years apart is a serious lifestyle change. Especially for about five years. I went part time. Would your dh agree with that? If not I would not do a second kid. |
|
Here are things that you don't do in a marriage unless BOTH partners are in agreement:
- Remove yourself from the workforce - Have a kid If you're husband wants you to work, you work. It is the default position of being an adult. Adults don't get to unilaterally decide that someone else will be responsible for your financial support. Likewise, if you don't want to have a 2nd kid, you don't. Adults don't get to unilaterally decide to make someone else a parent. The above said, you say that you may never was to return to the workforce. Perhaps that is what is so off-putting to your husband. What reason would you have to never go back to work? Maybe you two could compromise with an agreement that you'll quit or go part-time for x number of years, then go back. Saying that you just want to stop working forever is just not a good look, no matter how much you don't need the money. Think about it -- if you're a lawyer, then your husband fell for someone who was apparently intelligent and driven. That is the type of woman he is attracted to. Surely you can see that announcing that you want to become a lady who lunches might cause him concern? He may fear that you would become someone he doesn't like/respect/is attracted to. |
Sorry - fixed the typo |
It sounds like he’s becoming someone she doesn’t like, respect or is attracted to. |
Tough tiddles. She needs to get over it. |
|
I would talk to him and spell it out clearly. My DH also "seemed" uncomfortable with the idea of me being a SAHM. But by the time I actually said to him "I'd like to stay home for a while," he was 100% on board. I think the difference for him was in thinking about it conceptually versus thinking about it practically.
Conceptually, he prefers two incomes to one and the idea of being the sole breadwinner is stressful. Both understandable. I also prefer two incomes to one, if that factor is taken in isolation. And I totally understand why being the sole breadwinner is stressful. I also think he worried that if I stayed home, we'd drift apart because I'd be focused on home life and he'd be focused on work life and we wouldn't have as much in common anymore in terms of our day to day. But when the decision was actually made, we were talking about it practically -- the cost of childcare, what we want for our children, who does drop off and pick up from daycare, what that daycare is actually like for our kids, what home life is like, the cost of things like take out/meal kits/cleaning services to make up for the fact that we are both working all day, etc. Plus, just what our home feels like when we are both working, especially when I was working in my high stress job while trying to adjust to being a new mother. What it means like for us to relax or take vacations or just enjoy each others company when we are stretched thin on time. When we discussed it in practical terms, the benefits of that second income became a lot less appealing. Plus being a sole breadwinner is stressful, but so is the constant grind of working all day, coming home to a house where grocery still need to be bought and dinner still needs to be made and your partner is exhausted from their job and you want to spend quality time with your kids but there's too much chaos and you wind up just wanting them to go to bed so you can relax. Ground the conversation in reality. Talk details and logistics. Yes, many families make the dual income thing work. Those families aren't your family. They might have different jobs, different resources, different thresholds for stress, etc. That's fine. Focus on your family, your needs, what you guys want out of life. For us, having me stay home and then work PT got us exactly where we wanted to go, with less money but more of everything else. Help him see that whole picture. |
Of course many women do. Many, many women step out of the workforce to raise children. In Europe, women take long maternity leaves. Women often have a maternal desire to protect and raise their young. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. |
OP here. Thank you. This is helpful. |
It makes me so sad that we are to a point where a woman is greedy if she wants to stay home with children. 100 years ago, a woman wasn’t allowed to work. Now she’s a terrible person if she wants to stay home. How did we get to this? |