|
Op, tons of couples have 2 or 3 kids while both working full time and they seem to do fine. However, YOU are not those people and you are entitled to have the family (or at least aim for) that you feel YOU can handle.
So, if you think if would be too stressful for you to manage/raise two children while working but you feel your husband will not be supportive of you becoming a SAHP, jut keep the one child you have and keep working. Don’t rock the boat with a second child…. It is a HUGE leap going from one to two…. |
|
OP, I think staying home with your chlid is a legitimate desire, and a husband who loves you should be sympathetic to that. It sounds like your finances are fine for staying at home.
That said, it sounds more like you just want to quit work and not necessarily like you have a strong desire to be home with your kids? Why didn't you want to stay home with your first child? I stay home because it's like a "calling" and I'd be devastated if I had to spend the day away from my kids. It's not about not working. |
You need to get our more. |
“Devastated”? Lol what a drama queen |
+1 |
I’m with you, pp. I have done dual working parents, been the sole breadwinner, and been a SAHM, and (as long as you have enough money) being the sole breadwinner with DH staying at home is by far the best deal. I would say that it was a similar amount of work to being a SAHM, but you get so much more respect. Plus, I knew that we needed the money. So, even if I did nothing else at work but do what I needed to do to earn my paycheck, I still felt like I was contributing. Being a WOHP with a nanny or daycare taking care of your kids, never feeling like you have enough time at work or at home, turning down leadership roles, and walking home to the second shift at the end of the day... all kind of sucks. If you don’t need the money on top of it, it’s easy to wonder what it’s all for. |