|
OP I'm sorry people are being such hags. They are jealous because you have a lot of money. If they had as much cash, they'd all hire more help too.
Absolutely hire that help. I would not relent until he compromises somewhere. There is nothing wrong with using your resources to make your life a little better. You will be saner and a better mom. I wish I could hire additional help and I SAH too. |
OP, also remember we are in DC, where everyone loves to be a martyr and truly thinks they are morally and intellectually superior to anyone who can't do live exactly as they do. If you were living in NYC, no one would bat an eye at you hiring this kind of help. Do not let these internet strangers convince you that you have psychological problems because you're not relishing the idea of getting up all night plus dealing with a baby and a toddler all day. This is why moms of an infant and a toddler look like trash so often. It isn't easy! |
I’m the pp you’re replying to. I think 24/7 help for 3 months is absurd, but I’m definitely not arguing that OP shouldn’t hire help. Surely you can see that there’s a lot of leeway between never, ever being alone with your children for the first 3 months of baby #2’s life versus hiring enough help that you get some rest and have help feeding/bathing the children and doing their laundry? I was a SAHM to preterm twins and I had a lot of help, but I wasn’t afraid of spending a single hour alone with my babies. |
| For part-time help, sure but 24/7 help. Why have kids if you aren't going to parent them? |
It's your job. He works and makes the $$$$$$ income. |
Really? Because in NYC it is completely common. So much so that people who make a lot less than 800k try to stretch their budgets to afford baby nurses. Or get their parents to pay for it. In NYC private school circles, guarantee most people had a baby nurse for at least the first 6 weeks if not longer. Most do baby nurse for 3 months than transition to day nanny. |
You were really harsh in your first post and it implied that hiring help was a ridiculous idea. You backtracked ALOT from your original position. I actually think OP would be better off hiring a night nurse a few times a week for a month or 2, and hiring a part time nanny for the rest of the year. This would probably cost the same as 24/7 help for 3 months and be much more useful. She’s still going to need a break when the baby is 3 months old. |
What’s the point of making money if you’re still going to be slumming it with no help? If you can’t use the money to make your life better, what’s the point of working long hours to make even more money? This is a real question. |
|
Just hire someone during the day, or does he look into every expense?
That’s what I did but I had “my own” money to spend. |
Some variation of this gets asked of any working parent who uses daycares or nannies. It’s tiresome then and it’s tiresome now. |
Well, if she divorced him she’d probably get at least 200K in child support. That option is probably starting to look pretty good right about now... |
np when would you bond with the baby if you have someone 24/7 taking care of baby? I can understand wanting help but, you should have stuck with one if you are this unprepared. |
The husband REALLY wanted a boy. |
dp No we are not. If I had that husband I would have had only one. I like to bond to my babies. Sure get help but, 24/7 is over the top. Your kids won't even know you. |
This doesn't make you a "super mom."
That's a shitty descriptor to begin with, but not having hired help is nothing special. |