What’s the longest you’ve dated/stayed with someone just because the sex was good?

[Anonymous]

Seven years....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because the sex was good? I’ve only had one guy where it was just about the sex and it only lasted 2-3 months. He was very well endowed and I still remember the first time I saw it and he really knew how to use it. But he was about as interesting as a bag of rocks and not much brighter and his sex skills were just not enough for it to last longer.

That must have been an impressive endowment!

It was at least 8”+ and a big girth and pretty scary the first time.

Wow! Was it good or really painful?

I’d describe it as good pain as the first time he was pretty gentle which was a clue he had done this before! Over time I obviously grew to really enjoy it. My DH is average + and I’m more than happy.

+1. I had the same experience with a guy who was freakishly large. It was a little scary at first but he really knew what he was doing with it - including prework. I think big guys get a bad rep sometimes for just showing up but that hasn’t been my experience at all.

[Anonymous]

To those of you who stayed longer than you should have, what was it that you couldn’t get from anyone else?

[Anonymous]

Going on 12 years now. Definitely not someone to be in a relationship with and he knows, we have discussed how I am only around him for the sex. He doesn’t mind. I have had Fuller loving relationships before and that is definitely preferable. He is a divorcee and is fine with “being an a** because the sex will bring me back”. I think he would be pleased if I loved him. It ain’t happening.
I don’t think it is about getting something from him I can’t get elsewhere.... or maybe it is. What I get is to not expect or look for love and support and to know clearly I am visiting for sex (we see each other nearly daily, we both have large sexual appetites) and can go home afterwards. I know he won’t be trying to move in with me and will not be looking for me to take care of him. I recognize it is an unhealthy relationship that lacks true intimacy and I would not recommend it... unless the alternative is more trouble.

[Anonymous]

Saw him across a smokey bar and it was instant physical attraction. I realized after a couple of days that we were not going to have anything long term but, at the same time, I was happy to spend most of my off hours with him. Every day after work I would drive to his place and we would spend a few hours together....that lasted for several weeks and then we would stop seeing each other. After a few weeks had passed, we would start back up again. We went through several cycles like that and after a point I think we had just gotten to know each other too well and I remember that he was developing some expectations of me that I found annoying and probably vice versa. We just stopped seeing each other one day. And that was that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guy here, 2 years. Unreal oral skills. We didn't otherwise click.

In hindsight, I should have married her. From a man's perspective, almost everything else can be smoothed over if the sex is plentiful and good.

Don't do that to yourself. You'd be divorced from her now because the sex would have dried up there and it would have made things worse (the only thing you enjoyed about her just went away).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because the sex was good? I’ve only had one guy where it was just about the sex and it only lasted 2-3 months. He was very well endowed and I still remember the first time I saw it and he really knew how to use it. But he was about as interesting as a bag of rocks and not much brighter and his sex skills were just not enough for it to last longer.

That must have been an impressive endowment!

It was at least 8”+ and a big girth and pretty scary the first time.

Wow! Was it good or really painful?

That thing sounds like a WMD - weapon of mass destruction creating terror and envy wherever it goes.

One woman's WMD is another woman's perfect fit. We are all build different. There is a peg for every hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've never stayed in a relationship just because the sex was good but then again I've never been in a relationship where the sex was mind blowing which may be my fault, not just his. I've been married 24 years and we have a very good sex life and I adore my husband so I'm very happy but I'm sure he wishes I was wilder in bed (I do give BJ's and other fun things!) but I'm not a moaner or a sexual acrobat. I do wonder if women are like that or if that is just a guys dream.

Read the handcuffs thread for your answer (hint: some are like that and it's fun)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guy here, 2 years. Unreal oral skills. We didn't otherwise click.

In hindsight, I should have married her. From a man's perspective, almost everything else can be smoothed over if the sex is plentiful and good.

Rest easy, she would not have remained the same woman in bed if you married her. Then you'd still be stuck with her crazy.

SO true. My wife was a fun and adventurous in bed before marriage, and a cold prude now. But she is sane so there's that. Now if only I could find the ex for an AP, I would have it all!

np what are you doing to make it fun? stop blaming the woman!

Sounds like someone hit a little too close to home. Loosen up, Sandy baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who stayed longer than you should have, what was it that you couldn’t get from anyone else?

A couple of extra inches and an amazing mount of stamina before he finished. That was when I was 22 and now at 52 I couldn’t handle it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who stayed longer than you should have, what was it that you couldn’t get from anyone else?

A couple of extra inches and an amazing mount of stamina before he finished. That was when I was 22 and now at 52 I couldn’t handle it.

This is so true. When my husband and I were newly married we were good for 45 minutes to an hour from foreplay through finish. Now after 30 years it’s more like 20 minutes and neither of us complains. The good news is that we still want to have a very active sex life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who stayed longer than you should have, what was it that you couldn’t get from anyone else?

A couple of extra inches and an amazing mount of stamina before he finished. That was when I was 22 and now at 52 I couldn’t handle it.

Did you miss the size after you broke up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who stayed longer than you should have, what was it that you couldn’t get from anyone else?

A couple of extra inches and an amazing mount of stamina before he finished. That was when I was 22 and now at 52 I couldn’t handle it.

Did you miss the size after you broke up?

I think I missed the stamina more than the size because it was wonderful to have multiple O’s. At 52 I have no complaints since my husband does just fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because the sex was good? I’ve only had one guy where it was just about the sex and it only lasted 2-3 months. He was very well endowed and I still remember the first time I saw it and he really knew how to use it. But he was about as interesting as a bag of rocks and not much brighter and his sex skills were just not enough for it to last longer.

That must have been an impressive endowment!

It was at least 8”+ and a big girth and pretty scary the first time.

Wow! Was it good or really painful?

That thing sounds like a WMD - weapon of mass destruction creating terror and envy wherever it goes.

One woman's WMD is another woman's perfect fit. We are all build different. There is a peg for every hole.

Or a hole for every peg, as the case may be.

[Anonymous]

Reader, I married him.