Definitely. Show her it's the men who run the show, she just has to have the right men do it for her. JFC, you're pathetic. |
Not the PP, but why is it ok for OP to "go full on momma bear" (per another PP), but not ok for the father to do the same? |
|
It's not OK for either of them--this is still a child we're talking about. |
Some of the PPs were advocating for the mother to report the boy to admin, or the mother to confront him. But when another PP brought up the father doing the same thing, everyone was aghast. Why is that? |
Because a "no" from a girl/woman only counts when the message is delivered by her male relatives? |
Not me. What your son said was fine. I'm sorry the girl's sister was a jerk but that doesn't mean there is some universal double-standard for saying, "We're not dating." And women get hated on (or worse) by rejected men's guy-friends all the time. |
Unfortunately, in some cases, yes. |
O. M. F. G. Please, please confess that this was a satirical post, written to poke fun at the stereotypical "boys will be boys" approach to coddling and enabling athletes. There's no way anyone could be this genuinely moronic. |
|
Cautionary tale. Straight from today's headlines:
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2017/09/university_of_rochester_professor_s_alleged_sexual_harassment_of_students.html Backstory: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/09/she-was-a-rising-star-at-a-major-university-then-a-lecherous-professor-made-her-life-hell/ "Ignore it and hope he gets bored and moves on to someone else" is not a strategy. We need to teach our daughters that "no" means no. They need to state their boundaries and desires clearly (as OP's daughter did), and If a boy or a man does not hear and respect their boundaries, it's time to escalate until they change their behavior Harassment only gets worse unless women address it directly and aggressively. Help your daughter take this up with the school - a counselor or the assistant principal or principal. She told him no, and he will not let it go. Time to involve others. Sooner rather than later. |
We need to teach everyone that no means no. It's good for people who are being harassed to know what to do. But it's even better for people to not harass in the first place. |
I suspect it is an intuitive reaction about motivation. We're not really in a place, yet, as society where the concept of wives and daughters being a form of property for patriarchs has been completely banished, so the notion that it would be the FATHER doing the protecting strikes some people as archaic and sexist since in times past, that guarding would have been rooted in protecting his own interests, not those of his child's. |
And the violent consequences for noncompliance that it implies. |
No, let's not. I'm sorry this happened to your son, but the scenario you describe is not typical. You cannot project it more broadly. On the other hand, the scenario of the unrelenting male admirer/stalker is quite common. |
Because boys/men only have to heed a "no" from a girl/woman when her male relatives promise violent consequences for non-heeding? What kind of a world do you live in? Evidently not one where women have their own agency. |