Decision Time for DEI

[Anonymous]

Don’t give into a bully. Thanks, FCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So glad they are willing to raise taxes by $160 million to preserve the ability of a boy to pee on the seat in my daughter's restroom.

This post is so unhinged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If anything, this thread shows the Republican talking points went out this afternoon. Pathetic and transparent.

You just can't handle that the points being made are correct. Pathetic is trying to convince people that a boy is a girl. And more pathetic, taking advantage of children in the process.

Your “point” is that you can’t stand it to mind your own business. Still pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Will they raise taxes or will they just increase class sizes, cut programs, and let FCPS continue to deteriorate? It was already a badly managed and declining school system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, according to our leadership: Boys in girls' spaces > Title I kids, Special Ed kids, etc. and I am assuming lots of other programs.

Boys don't want girls in their bathrooms and locker rooms either. Why can't fcps just have a dedicated unisex bathroom/locker room area for the gender changing people?

Why can’t the one random kid “offended” by the transgender kid just use a unisex bathroom? Why is the transgender kid being forced to compromise for the random kid who is super big mad about them being in the bathroom to just pee?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, according to our leadership: Boys in girls' spaces > Title I kids, Special Ed kids, etc. and I am assuming lots of other programs.

Boys don't want girls in their bathrooms and locker rooms either. Why can't fcps just have a dedicated unisex bathroom/locker room area for the gender changing people?

Why can’t the one random kid “offended” by the transgender kid just use a unisex bathroom? Why is the transgender kid being forced to compromise for the random kid who is super big mad about them being in the bathroom to just pee?

Because the boy pretending to be a girl is the interloper. The one interloper who is stepping on the right of the real girls. Do you even hear yourself?

[Anonymous]

This is high up on the list of reasons I plan to exit Fcps for a catholic private once the vouchers are a reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, according to our leadership: Boys in girls' spaces > Title I kids, Special Ed kids, etc. and I am assuming lots of other programs.

Boys don't want girls in their bathrooms and locker rooms either. Why can't fcps just have a dedicated unisex bathroom/locker room area for the gender changing people?

Why can’t the one random kid “offended” by the transgender kid just use a unisex bathroom? Why is the transgender kid being forced to compromise for the random kid who is super big mad about them being in the bathroom to just pee?

It’s a lot more than one random kid who has a problem with this. The trans community is very small. It makes sense for them to use the single bathrooms. It’s not like communal bathrooms and locker rooms are a prize.

[Anonymous]

Pretty soon we will have a boys bathroom and a unisex bathroom.

Just like we will have boys sports and unisex sports.

Girls are losing their safe spaces everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider who is the fascist here. The federal government attempting to defend Title IX or our School Board spending taxpayer funds on legal defense and foregoing federal funds for Title I and other programs?

+1000
Just astounding that this has to be spelled out.

First of all, you really have no clue how unhinged the "+1000" posts sound, do you?

Second of all, yes, you need to spell out your lies. The idea of this administration genuinely "defending Title IX" is a fascism fig leaf. The blackmail threat of cutting off funds as a way to coerce compliance is textbook authoritarian state.

You can't win this, they have love and science on their side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t give into a bully. Thanks, FCPS.

Reid is the real bully for letting “transitioning boys” into girls locker rooms and restrooms. If this continues sooner or later FCPS will have the same types of issues that already occurred in Loudoun County.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, according to our leadership: Boys in girls' spaces > Title I kids, Special Ed kids, etc. and I am assuming lots of other programs.

Boys don't want girls in their bathrooms and locker rooms either. Why can't fcps just have a dedicated unisex bathroom/locker room area for the gender changing people?

They tried that, and a student sued the school, claiming that being directed to use the neutral bathroom was mean and harmful. Unfortunately, she won the case.

How?!? That is the most common sense approach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider who is the fascist here. The federal government attempting to defend Title IX or our School Board spending taxpayer funds on legal defense and foregoing federal funds for Title I and other programs?

+1000
Just astounding that this has to be spelled out.

First of all, you really have no clue how unhinged the "+1000" posts sound, do you?

Second of all, yes, you need to spell out your lies. The idea of this administration genuinely "defending Title IX" is a fascism fig leaf. The blackmail threat of cutting off funds as a way to coerce compliance is textbook authoritarian state.

You can't win this, they have love and science on their side.

I have taught Title I kids (kids who live in poverty.) If anyone thinks that what FCPS is doing is a good idea and "righteous," you are sadly mistaken.

[Anonymous]

What an awful choice FCPS is making. They are risking losing millions in federal funds to stand their ground. How is it ok to make a few students feel good by using a bathroom/changing area that aligns with what they feel/think they are versus what they are born with? So those few students feel comfortable at the expense of the majority? I for one have stopped giving money to the schools and will always vote no to future bonds if this is how FCPS just throws money away by making this decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What an awful choice FCPS is making. They are risking losing millions in federal funds to stand their ground. How is it ok to make a few students feel good by using a bathroom/changing area that aligns with what they feel/think they are versus what they are born with? So those few students feel comfortable at the expense of the majority? I for one have stopped giving money to the schools and will always vote no to future bonds if this is how FCPS just throws money away by making this decision.

The School Board had a closed meeting last month. I assume this was discussed. The comments said that "no action" was taken. I would love to have heard the discussion in that meeting. They cannot all be in favor of this, can they?

Reid said up to $160 million could be lost. Wonder if that includes the millions in legal fees?