That is such a shallow way of viewing this issue. Most men are not ceos or law partners either. It’s not the gender that gets people those positions it’s the lust for power. Which is not a good thing. Society doesn’t benefit just because the evil CEO is now a woman. We still have a classist society based on exploitation even if a woman is doing the exploiting. |
You lack basic logic which is I guess the main reason for your incel like thinking. No, most men are not CEOs. However, most CEOs are men. Get it now? |
I’m a DP. Are you able to show a single clip of a tv show or mainstream ad that presents a man as a desirable role model as opposed to a bumbling oaf or evil power broker? I don’t see these role models for what a young man should aspire to be. |
|
I have a young boy and I think it's small minded to assume helping girls hurts boys. I actually find it to be the opposite as having girls around loosens up the rigid roles boys were shoved into when I was a kid. My son is free to play sports at school and all the same kids got to learn bead art in aftercare. It's about balance.
I really think the radicalization of boys is an internet phenomenon, back when I was a kid we wouldn't be allowed to talk to complete unvetted strangers so young. |
DP. Most things do sort of have to swing back and forth a bit before finding equilibrium. Maybe instead of lashing out, you can look inward and figure out how to contribute to finding that balance, and not just fanning flames. |
“Men” don’t. Some men do. So do some women. Your whole framing of the issue displays your obvious bias against men. |
Thanks for the personal insult. How compelling. Almost like toxic masculinity, no? Why does the gender of a ceo matter more than the actions of a ceo or the overall power that the executive class wields over those with less? I would suggest that it doesn’t. We should be advocating for less corporate power overall. |
I am literally the one that is calling for the middle road. That is what finding balance looks like. Not promoting a wild swing in the opposite direction. Were am I fanning flames? By asking for a middle road where people are judged for their actions and not their sex? |
Are you the same poster who wrote “you are toxic. You treat boys like criminals…”? |
The Pitt! Not White Lotus lol |
No I am not. |
It matters in this conversation since you are begrudging the messaging to girls that they are capable of doing anything or being in certain roles. Boys don't need to be explicitly told because they are already in those roles by overwhelming majorities. They know they belong there. No one is actively working to hold them back or to keep them out. Why don't you spend more time trying to actively include women and level the playing field instead of feeling like a victim? Again, you're not. You're not missing any opportunities as a man. Women still are. |
Google says it is a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active. |
NP: These stereotypes are absolutely false though. the kids who run into trouble are then ones who don't fit them but are teated as if they do; they are wrongly assumed to fit them. |
No, the premise of the thread is 'boys who became incels." Not all boys. Also, if a well raised, nicely adjusted boy sees the commercial you reference, they do not see themselves in the boys portrayed, and they are rooting for the girl. That is how my boys see that commercial. They understand the message, and they know it isn't about them. If you see yourself in the boys in the commercial and it makes you angry, that suggests the problem is you. |