| OP, you have to push back and set some firm boundaries. My husband would control me if he could. It's his personality. I don't think his subordinates at work love his leadership style. But I don't let him. I push back on unreasonable demands. I let him go in his corner and pout about it, but it doesn't mean he's getting his way every time. |
How did she get tricked? |
I mean my grandma was a SAHM but my granddad didn't control her to this extent. That's not normal at all. |
You have zero basis to allege abuse here. You're just projecting. Either deal with facts from this post or start another one about abused women. OP is not being abused. |
I mean, he does now have a live-in cook, laundress, and Instacarter. |
To WHAT extent? She agreed to this deal and he is simply asking to discuss finances. That is a far cry from abuse. |
Another thing OP shouldn't have agreed to. |
Because I disagree with you that women like OP are dumb, weak, naive, and incapable of making decisions or being responsible for their own decisions and choices. THat hey exist only at the whim of men. I have a much, much higher view of women than you do and as a woman, I find your view that she is just a woman and so any expectation of her other than being a victim isn't reasonable to be incredibly insulting. |
He isn't discussing, he is dictating. Big difference. |
Show me where she says he is dictating anything! This is what she actually wrote: "My boyfriend is the opposite and asked if I really need those things. He called them “ a waste of money”." Stop making shit up. Grow up. |
|
They were dating - he said move in, I am a man and will be your provider and you can cook and clean - and she said yes.
And people are saying, she is a woman - she isn't capable of understanding this or being responsible for her choices. He must be abusive and she is just a victim and not able in any way to make decisions or speak for herself or be responsible for herself. She is just a woman after all. How was she to know when he said I will be the provider and you will cook and clean that he meant he would be the provider and she would cook and clean. That is crazy to expect a woman to understand that. |
What dictation? He criticized her spending. He didn’t order her to stop it. I agree this is a passive aggressive way of expressing resentment about the terms of the arrangement. Some groceries and the like is not equivalent of rent. OP should suggest a financial reset and insist on paying half the rent and bills (or whatever proportion is right for any income differential). |
Perhaps he didn't know just how much she spends on frivolous things every month, but after a month of living together he is finally realizing. So he is trying to feel out the situation and plan for his future with her. There is nothing wrong with asking questions about things that financially impact him too. And the things that she spends money on may be important to her but they are a waste of time so calling them that is not controlling or abusive. |
Women are just too dumb to make their own decisions and the only way they end up in these situations is if a much smarter man tricks them, right? (sarcasm, of course) |
And he's also realizing that by paying for all the rent and housing costs, he is enabling her to spend on things he disagrees with. There is probably a compromise to be found through good communication. |