With what? A fine? Jail? |
OP, you can ignore that poster. You won't be able to get through to them. It's hard to see how they can reasonably respond how they did to what you posted. They must be in a bad place. |
I'm the poster right above this post. This is such an immature way to handle this. Not to mention it's creating your son to have bitter resentment feelings towards his father. Don't do this, OP. |
^^ Well dang, so many people posted between my OP and my response. I'm the poster with the 17 yo senior kid too. |
Can you not read??? |
It's some angry alienated dad with too much time on his hands. The men's rights angle is ironic because the 17 year old is virtually a man himself. |
OP, you need to figure out a way to take yourself completely out of this situation. Do you need your car on those weekends? Let your kid drive himself to visit dad.
If kid refuses to drive himself or let you drive him, kid needs to call dad. If kid doesn't show up for visitation, dad can call cops. You are being controlled by both the men in your life right now. Remove yourself from the middle. |
The truth will cause bitter resentment? |
I agree with this. The 17 year old is on the cusp of manhood. |
You don't handle it this way and you are the parent. It is your responsibility to handle it. Dad is not the parent. Dad is a visitor in this child's life. And, you never involve the police. You tell the child to go to the visit or there are consequences at home. Simple. |
A 17 year old is still a child and needs the parent to parent him. |
You never ever say that to your child. Dad isn't being a d/ck by wanting to see his child 4 days a month. |
Do you have an older teen? Yes, an older teen needs to be parented but they also need flexibility/understanding as they stand on the cusp of adulthood and seek to establish appropriate boundaries and priorities. It is perfectly reasonable for an older teen to prioritize their own friends and hobbies over spending time with their parents. This is true of both the custodial and non-custodial parents, for what it is worth. |
More reading comprehension issues. I'm the PP that posted the "suggestion." I thought it was obvious that it was tongue-in-cheek -- I even said OP wouldn't do it and would continue taking the high road and called her a good mom for that reason. Of course no good mom will ever say a thing like that, because she cares about her kid -- even though it's the truth that these "fathers' rights" posters want to pretend doesn't exist. It's like, if we aren't allowed to say it out loud then it can't be real. It's real. Your relationship with your kids is not "mommy's fault." Grow up. |
He is a child at 17 years and 354 days and at the stroke of midnight turns into an adult, eh? |