Not so sure about that. Plenty of lazy women in nice areas looking for Mr. Paycheck. It is kind of disgusting - and extremely obvious. |
Pfft. "High quality" - keep telling yourself that. Not what other people see, at all. Men aren't stupid. |
|
Man. These comments.
Women who are unmarried with no children are the happiest group of people in the world. Who do we all want to get married so badly? These guys are terrible. |
That's the point - if these women were so "high quality" - wouldn't they have anyone they want, without having to use (for example) a fancy car or whatever to bait them and make them think they have more money than they really have? *If it is not you don't worry about it. |
Bait them? Who married anyone without knowing their true financial picture? |
I think the point is that there are plenty of women who try to pretend to be someone they are not - can't really blame OP for being tired of what's out there. |
Oh please. Men don’t worship celebrities. Women do that all on their own. |
| The majority of 20 year old women that would be interested in a middle aged man, would be someone interested in money. SAHM may also prefer not to work and weed people out who may not provide that lifestyle to them. Stop dating 20 year olds if you don’t want to be seen as $$$. |
+1 Look around. Some women don't know how to be happy - a man isn't going to help that situation. |
| Makes total sense to me. As a man, you are either young with great career prospects or middle aged / old, wealthy and generous in order to be successful on the dating scene. Otherwise, crumbles and don't be too picky. |
The NFL, MLB and NBA would be bankrupt if this were true. Men worship them so much they literally make up pretend teams of celebrities to play against other pretend teams of celebrities. All that’s missing is the action figures. |
Wrong. Your ex should be supporting your child but the house is expense is yours and yours alone. |
More women use men for money than men use women for money. For every 1 guys, there’s 10 women who do it. |
He should be paying for the child’s expenses and the child’s school, but he is not responsible for your house. Would you take care of his house expenses or at least part of them if the roles were reversed? I think not. You’re no longer married and his doesn’t have to support you, only his son. If you can’t afford a good enough house, it’s time for you to look at your own expenses and think about getting a better job. If a man was in that position, everyone would tell the man to get a higher paying job, so you don’t get a pass. |
I never indicated it was solely about money, you did. High value men goes well beyond a high income. |