McLean not laying down after Arlington ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Being smart has a genetic component

Anyone who pays 1,000,000 for 1800 square feet in Arlington is not that smart. Rich, perhaps. But not smart.

I paid $1.0 million in 2009 and that same house is now worth $1.8 million. I am also next to Metro, can walk anywhere and a 5 min drive to DC and an airport.

God- I’m soooooo dumb.

Someone should start a thread on the most obnoxious parents. Bet Arlington wins

They already have that on the Latin soccer message board. Mclean in VA. and Potomac in MD are the top racist clubs they talk about.

There is no latin soccer board.

There 100% is a latin soccer board. Very little local travel talk more about the local latin leagues like the Bolivian league. also the local cash game leagues. Many former professional players from Central America play in cash leagues where they are paid to play in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Being smart has a genetic component

Anyone who pays 1,000,000 for 1800 square feet in Arlington is not that smart. Rich, perhaps. But not smart.

I paid $1.0 million in 2009 and that same house is now worth $1.8 million. I am also next to Metro, can walk anywhere and a 5 min drive to DC and an airport.

God- I’m soooooo dumb.

Someone should start a thread on the most obnoxious parents. Bet Arlington wins

They already have that on the Latin soccer message board. Mclean in VA. and Potomac in MD are the top racist clubs they talk about.

There is no latin soccer board.

There 100% is a latin soccer board. Very little local travel talk more about the local latin leagues like the Bolivian league. also the local cash game leagues. Many former professional players from Central America play in cash leagues where they are paid to play in.

Am interested - would you mind posting a link? Thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Being smart has a genetic component

Anyone who pays 1,000,000 for 1800 square feet in Arlington is not that smart. Rich, perhaps. But not smart.

I paid $1.0 million in 2009 and that same house is now worth $1.8 million. I am also next to Metro, can walk anywhere and a 5 min drive to DC and an airport.

God- I’m soooooo dumb.

Someone should start a thread on the most obnoxious parents. Bet Arlington wins

They already have that on the Latin soccer message board. Mclean in VA. and Potomac in MD are the top racist clubs they talk about.

There is no latin soccer board.

There 100% is a latin soccer board. Very little local travel talk more about the local latin leagues like the Bolivian league. also the local cash game leagues. Many former professional players from Central America play in cash leagues where they are paid to play in.

Am interested - would you mind posting a link? Thanks

I’m interested, too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

SYC’s MLS Next only go through U14. So it’s meant to help you get McLean age groups?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

SYC’s MLS Next only go through U14. So it’s meant to help younger McLean age groups?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

SYC’s MLS Next only go through U14. So it’s meant to help you get McLean age groups?

U14 for this year but I heard that it's going to be for older age groups as well starting next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

How does this really help anyone? Cant anyone already try out for those teams anyway? It’s not like they’ll have the same coaches, would still involve tryouts and making a team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

How does this really help anyone? Cant anyone already try out for those teams anyway? It’s not like they’ll have the same coaches, would still involve tryouts and making a team.

Maybe something where they send their top players to train with the teams from those leagues and that they could also guest play? Each club retains their players to play in their own leagues as well. As an example, McLean would send their top 08 boy to train a few times per week with SYC and guest play in games while also being able to retain him to play in ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

How does this really help anyone? Cant anyone already try out for those teams anyway? It’s not like they’ll have the same coaches, would still involve tryouts and making a team.

Maybe something where they send their top players to train with the teams from those leagues and that they could also guest play? Each club retains their players to play in their own leagues as well. As an example, McLean would send their top 08 boy to train a few times per week with SYC and guest play in games while also being able to retain him to play in ECNL.

In this example is it presuming that mls next is the better players? If so, we’re saying a kid who would otherwise make one of those teams stays home with McLean but can play over to satisfy better training? Why wouldn’t the player just make the move for more consistent training? Maybe a mid level kid not quite ready for a better combined team does that by getting pushed in an extra practice, but I imagine that’s only a handful of kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is SYC really merging with McLean or is this conjecture? I have boys but SYC seems like the stronger club in the younger years at this point.

Seems like silly conjecture at this point, I'm not sure how that geography even works for either team. It skips over half a dozen teams in the middle that make more sense for either squad to link up up with.

Not a merger but a partnership. McLean gets access to MLSNext for boys and SYC gets ECNL access for girls. Seems pretty simple. Does anyone have any other details?

How does this really help anyone? Cant anyone already try out for those teams anyway? It’s not like they’ll have the same coaches, would still involve tryouts and making a team.

Maybe something where they send their top players to train with the teams from those leagues and that they could also guest play? Each club retains their players to play in their own leagues as well. As an example, McLean would send their top 08 boy to train a few times per week with SYC and guest play in games while also being able to retain him to play in ECNL.

In this example is it presuming that mls next is the better players? If so, we’re saying a kid who would otherwise make one of those teams stays home with McLean but can play over to satisfy better training? Why wouldn’t the player just make the move for more consistent training? Maybe a mid level kid not quite ready for a better combined team does that by getting pushed in an extra practice, but I imagine that’s only a handful of kids.

Maybe because the clubs aren't next door to each other a player may not want to fully commit to a new club, maybe they like their current team but would benefit from higher level commitment in MLS/ECNL. For the club it may work where they don't lose a top player and at the same time offer more training/games. I think it probably best benefits the clubs by being able to retain their players while also dangling the carrot at the end of the stick. Pure speculation on my part though.

[Anonymous]

Curious to find out if this does indeed happen.

[Anonymous]

It wouldn't surprise me if MLS starts their own little "All In" and start squeezing out clubs connected to ECNL.

It is hard to say that McLean wanted SYC for the MLS next pathway when they have a ECNL side.

I predict that SYC will lose its MLS Next slot.

[Anonymous]

Alexandria applied to GA. Waiting for the acceptance.
Not sure if SYC applied to GA.