Well, women almost always have a higher value on the sexual market. What other posters are saying is irrelevant- I'm telling you that you losing 20 pounds from your fat body does not make you a hot young thing. And she may still want to keep you around, because you provide some kind of value to her, even if it's not hotness. Again, I would love to hear about her business. It may not be why you are on this thread but at this point you have to accept that your GF sounds much more interesting and accomplished than you. |
You insult me and then ask me for her business advice? And then claim I'm the one without social IQ. Irony! What'd I'd rather know is what my value is to her then. You have no well-developed theory on that. |
LOL. I'm not asking you for business advise, hunty. Realize that, from how you've described yourself thus far, you are pretty much the last person I would want business (or career) advice from. I was actually asking you to mention what field she's in, but clearly you find that offensive (probably emasculating) and thus are refusing to do it. Whatever. Your GF is the most interesting thing about you. |
| Op, you are an insufferable douche. |
You don't know anything about me. For all you know I have a PhD in romance languages from Yale and have published 4 books with Cambridge Press. She might sell medical devices. Most people, including the New York Times, would find my career more interesting. Typical low-brow folk on DCUM who think a 4 bedroom house in Chevy Chase is a wet dream might find the 400k made on medical devices more interesting... Get some breadth. |
+1 |
Nice claim. Very little support. |
Bahaha. She outearns you, bruh. You may think your career is more prestigious than hers because you have more degrees, but I think most people would say the opposite. She's the one who's smart enough to make a shit ton of money with just a bachelors. Meanwhile you have all the degrees money can buy, and barely make a fourth of her income. That's pretty sad, dude. Sorry, but she is more of a success, by objective measures. WAY more of one, actually. She not only flays you in the earning arena, but she did it without the advantage of having upper level degrees. Time to take an honest look in the mirror. Just keep some tissues nearby for when you do. |
Go back and reread this thread- PLENTY of support
|
Only someone who is nouveau riche could have your worldview. The difference between us is pretty obvious to me now. I grew up wealthy. My father's father made plenty. It's called old money. We are therefore able to pursue a luxury career (something prestigious and enjoyable). Sure I make less than many guys who own plumbing businesses. But you don't see a lot of men who are owners of plumbing businesses in the New York Times wedding section. Sure do see a lot of PhDs tho! |
You dont see a lot of people who are earning barely 6 figures in the NYT wedding section, either. You better hope your sugar mama makes a big enough bonus to make up for your lack of earning. Guess what? I'm old money too. And it's no excuse to slack off, or to try to convince yourself youre a success when the reality is that youve had every advantage in the world and still cant really compete when it comes down to pure earnings. My whole family has a lot of money, lots of Ivy degrees. And the ones that slacked off and relied on the family money? Well, theyre pretty big losers now that theyre older. Usually, sooner or later, the money runs out. Even if it doesnt, America is a country that bases respect off of earned income. If your career is mediocre and middling, no one will be impressed. ESPECIALLY when they find out how many degrees you had to get just to achieve that mediocrity. |
| Not sure why people are attacking the OP. The answer is inertia, clearly. She is waiting around hoping it will all settle down and eventually you'll marry her out of inertia. Or she knows you are not compatible but also doesn't want to leave you because she knows you are a "good catch". Do her a favor and end it. |
Wow. You really are a massive fucking loser. |
You have a very strange way of defining "slacking off"... Do you think these two folks "slacked off" http://english.la.psu.edu/faculty-staff/mfb12 http://www.gov.harvard.edu/people/faculty/robert-putnam Clearly there are many small business owners who sell boring things like insurance, medical supplies, toilet bowls that make more than these 2 big-shot academics... But I don't think most people who say that A) Putnam or Berube have "slacked off" or B) that they are less successful than small business owners who have higher incomes Do you think actors on broadway who win acting prizes are "slacking off"... again they make less. You need a different barometer. I'm surprised for someone who grew up in such an accomplished old money home that prestige doesn't trump pay stub. Very odd, from my experience with a similar world. Parents at my parents country clubs far more impressed with Ivy pedigree than pay stubs. |
you resort to personal attack because you can't defeat the argument. clear i got under your skin because i have a way with the written joust. |