|
OP, I say this kindly as someone who dated older for most of my 20s and who was engaged to someone 11 years older -- don't do this.
Partnering with someone significantly puts you at a disadvantage -- they earn more and they are more established in their career, so your mobility is limited. When there is a choice about where to go in the relationship, when you do the math, you will always lose out -- because you earn less and have less time invested in a career. It's unfair in a way that is very subtle, and I didn't realize the dynamic until it was too late. I have really encouraged my DD to partner with someone much closer to her age. Also, as a divorced parent of 2, it's a huge red flag that your partner already has 2 older kids - does he have full 50% custody? Does he take care of 50% of the parenting load? I really think you should get into individual therapy and consider why you are willing to accept such a limited future life for yourself in the name of "love". It's a huge romanticization and de-rationalization of one of the most important decisions you will make in your life. |
Of course not, he's out f***ing around with someone half his age. |
|
Sorry OP, you are getting what you deserve.
You have to crowd-source this? To call you a victim is to do injustice to real victims. |
If you've daddy issues, its fine. If not then you'll be bored with him in 10 years because he'll age way faster after 55 and you two are going to be in really different age groups. |
Even if she has daddy issues it won’t be fine in 10 years because she won’t enjoy being his “mommy”. Signed mid 40s woman with daddy issues. The oldest “Daddy” I dated in my 40s was a year younger than me. I loved him “parenting” me I’m a pillow princess and Babe.
|
|
You are 27. You are ten years into being an adult and can choose who you want to date or be in a relationship with. You are more than capable of assessing your own situation, getting to know the other person, figuring out if this is right for you or not. You can assess the dynamic, how age plays a role now and in the future and decide if the benefits are worth it.
Women and men are both capable of making informed decisions about their lives. You are an adult and can make whatever decisions you want. What random people online say knowing a couple paragraphs about you shouldn't really shape your thinking. |
I wouldn't have a child with a woman over the age of 32. Don't take it personal if you are past that age. It's just my preference. And I do think I want to get anyone pregnant either once I am past 30. I'm 25 now and engaged. My fiance is 26. As soon as we get married we will try for a child. Because so many people are having children so late in life, the science has evolved to accommodate them and make them think like it's okay. If you look at most SN kids, they were born of older parents. |
Why are you on a mommy website? |
You are going to trigger so many people lol. People think having a first child at 40 is totally normal. |
Does the data back this up? Are you saying younger people are less likely to have a child with SN? |
That's what happens when one of the partners (mostly women) wants everything right away and not patient to build something beautiful with their men. Either you get established or young men. |
| I know a couple with a large age gap that i believe is about 21-22 years. They are the parents of DD’s friend. From what I have observed, it’s been a very happy marriage. But while he had always been in amazing shape, a few years ago his health turned and she is now his caregiver. |
I’m not planning on having kids in my 40s. My child was both when I was 27 but his dad being 11 years older is a very likely reason for autism (no genetic predispositions otherwise). I believe it’s fair not to want having kids with older partners. Both for potential of birth complications and out of concern about elderly care happing at the same time with child care. Life is challenging enough even without that. OP surely should make her own The recent research shows that old paternal age is the larger contributor to certain brain conditions in babies than old maternal age. The reason for that is that “old” egg that is able to be fertilized is likely still a “good” egg. Low quality eggs don’t develop into pregnancy. Whereby semen carries tons of deviant genes and can still fertilize eggs. That later develops into a baby that’s healthy physically but could show certain mental special needs. |
Yes there was research to it but both parents must be young and heathy, not just the woman |
Is your DD’s friend a good student ? |