| If they were choosing Texas over DC I might share your consternation? But I'm with them on this one: they are old and independent enough to live where they want to live without having to worry about mommy's feelings. |
So you picked this new random guy over your AC? And you're surprised they don't want to uproot their entire lives to move to your new city? Just so you can maybe "help" with their child? |
+1 |
| Of all the places in the world, would anyone choose DC if they had the choice? |
|
Boy, you people are hostile today.
OP, I get it. I'm so hoping to be near our child when they are an adult. I don't think that is selfish or whatever else is being bantered about on here. It's normal. But, I do think you answered your own question: Not super close to you, not a close relationship with your spouse, jobs are more central where they are, and very little connection to DC area. I'm not seeing a huge reason you'd think they'd want to stay here?? And you can't move there so . . . . As for some of the posters being so typically nasty on here, you're jerks. And lots of you are SUPER weird for being ok with not being close to family. You can want your kids to be successful and still have family roots, whether it is where they are (and you move) or in their hometown. |
We have lived in all 3 of those locations. Hands down I'd pick the West coast (with Seattle first, then SanFran next) over DCUMland any day we raised our kids to explore life, to be happy and do what they enjoy. That means they may want to travel and explore the world and live somewhere other than where we live. I would never want to feel my kid chose where to live solely because of where mom and dad are. I didn't do that, so why would I restrict my kids |
Ummm...housing is worse in both SF and Seattle. I'd go with they live where they want to live---they like SF and Seattle and the job prospects are better. DCUM is NOT a tech hub. There really are not many non-govt jobs. Those truly into tech will find a much better lifestyle in both SF and Seattle. Both are more laid back, more enjoyable places to live with much better work life balance (seattle has the best for this) |
I think essentially 99% of posters are saying that is the answer, which OP seems completely unable or unwilling to entertain. |
|
I’m wondering if your friend group norms are what’s behind this question, OP. Are you getting lots of questions from them about why your kids don’t live near you? Is it making you feel bad?
In my experience, one set of grandparents only wanted to “help” bc they wanted their friends to think better of them. They wanted to be able to post on FB about it more than they really wanted to spend quality time with their grandkids. |
|
You seem self-absorbed, OP. Why would they want you in their lives on a regular, local basis when even you say you aren't "close" with them?
Also, DC is a dumpster fire. I'd move out west in a heartbeat. But I am stuck here because my kids (some ACs) love it here and love my house, and it is super important to my husband and me that we live near them. But we are "close," share feelings and spend a lot of time together. |
Not really. A) she can’t due to her and her spouses job and B) there is a hearty amount of nastiness aside from that suggestion. And it’s gross. |
+1, Op, you have two strikes against you (remarried and relocated). Be glad they are fully launched, well done! |
Sorry, she can, but won't and her job and spouse are an excuse. Perfectly valid, but her kids have perfectly valid reasons to live on the West Coast too. So, once more...if she is convinced they aren't moving back home, she has only one option...move there. |
If you live them unconditionally, mind their boundaries and extend respect and support to their spouse, you can easily improve odds in your favor. |
| *love |