Honestly? By that time we are hoping all of your old cronies have peacefully gone to meet their maker so that the youth that gives a fluck about the future has some minor chance of protecting it. We hate your political games. Hate it. Fix it. |
Jones is toast — unfortunately. He will vote with the party. |
I posted the question and I’m 36. I don’t see the Dems doing anything different if they had the presidency and senate and were about to lose power. They would replace Thomas in a heartbeat... |
Once again, you are vastly underestimating the power of a voting trend you’ve never seen before. It’s going to be the young people that blow this shish out of the water. Run and poll that. When these 18 year olds have their marriage and children being schooled (virtually?) with no social security, no privacy, basic rights completely compromised, they are going to change the entire political landscape. America as a country is a baby in comparison to other societies. Unless a balance of power is true and protected, it is inevitable that these exploits on both sides won’t blow up in everyone’s face. So confess your political sins, repent, and redeem yourself with actions that truly change matters in a way that makes every single person walking around in this country feel safe when they wake up. Not scared, not depressed, not fearful of whatever the idiot of chief is destroying next. Fix it! |
| I’m so angry I want to punch something. |
The difference between me and you and is that I choose for myself based on what I think is best for the country. You choose based on your fears. If you think the best thing you can do for the country is to get another seat on the court, go ahead do it, but take responsibility for it. Don't do it just because you think I would. |
The Kelly-Mcssally election is a special election. The Jones election is part of the regular cycle after Jones won a special election. |
You are using the wrong analogy. The dems didn't hold a seat for 10 months under the guide of "let the next guy fill it" only to turn around and try to cram a new nomination in in the next 45 days. The issue isn't filling this seat, it was witholding the last one and then hypocritically filling this one. |
But the dems didn't sit on a nomination for 10 months in the prior administration. |
|
Biden said in 2019 he would not expand Supreme Court and Sanders also does. It want to expand the Supreme Court:
"My worry is that the next time the Republicans are in power they will do the same thing, I think that is not the ultimate solution," Sanders said in response to a question at a forum on Monday organized by public employee unions and other liberal groups. |
You won’t get an expansion of the court. Even FDR failed his attempt at it. You try it and succeed, Republicans add 20 justices next time they are in control... |
|
CALM DOWN PEOPLE. To get back on topic... Susan Collins just said she'd only consider a nominee by the President-elect. Which means she won't consider a Trump nominee if he doesn't win this election. That's a huge deal, considering Biden is favored to win and is better placed than Hillary Clinton was at the same period. For the moment, Collins is all alone in that corner. Murkowski just punted to after Nov 3rd, and Romney has't said anything. I believe they may both vote for a Trump nominee during the lame duck period. Don't count on Romney in particular, because he is sure to vote his conscience and his conscience is a conservative one! The odds are still very much in favor of a 3rd Trump appointee to the Supreme Court. |
| I don't trust Susan Collins. |
+1. She consulted with Mitch before her announcement. She's in a tight race and she's trying to look fair. There is no chance of her not voting for the Trump nominee if they need her vote. |
You don't get itm. The Republicans have just destroy d any semblance of institutional legitimacy. It doesn't matter anymorem. If the GOP adds 5 more in response then the Dems will just have to add five more. It will never end. You can't shit on the system and expect to get away with it. |