Held back but gifted, is this frowned upon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel like the people answering must not have smart kids. The top of the pack, as in the kids >95th percentile would likely be fine to skip an entire grade. And they would still be top of the pack if they did. I guarantee they would not suddenly be 50th percentile kids. All of this “they only seem smart bc they are the oldest” wrong. They would still be >90 th percentile or higher in the next grade and smarter than most of their classmates. There isn’t that much difference between one grade. Put your kid where fit the best socially and the academics will be met by supplemental material at home or gifted programs.

It sounds like you and your kids aren’t intelligent at all. Did you read the OP at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like the people answering must not have smart kids. The top of the pack, as in the kids >95th percentile would likely be fine to skip an entire grade. And they would still be top of the pack if they did. I guarantee they would not suddenly be 50th percentile kids. All of this “they only seem smart bc they are the oldest” wrong. They would still be >90 th percentile or higher in the next grade and smarter than most of their classmates. There isn’t that much difference between one grade. Put your kid where fit the best socially and the academics will be met by supplemental material at home or gifted programs.

It sounds like you and your kids aren’t intelligent at all. Did you read the OP at all?

Yes, I understand perfectly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Ugh this is such misogyny. Why can’t you myopic, Type A , educated “boy moms” see this??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Ugh this is such misogyny. Why can’t you myopic, Type A , educated “boy moms” see this??

Because they feel empowered by birthing creatures that will reinforce the power structure, and they’re further and further removed from some of the indignity of misogyny. The women who are concerned about the unfairness they claim boys face are rotten to their daughters and to other women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Ugh this is such misogyny. Why can’t you myopic, Type A , educated “boy moms” see this??

She’s so disgusting. To be of the typical age and income and educational level of posters here and pretend that school has favored girls is absolute horseshit.

But laugh and enjoy her earnest citation of “a guy who has a podcast.” I know the man she references but without thinking - she’s not a thinker anyway - she wrote “a man said it so you have to believe it.” Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Yeah totally after all in this very nation, it was far more common for girls to be formally educated than boys.

Can you please have your posted bronzed - get Galloway to sign it first (he is not a doctor of philosopher or education or science - he’s a business prof who tells people what they want to hear, like a less serious Malcolm Gladwell). If you have a straight son, any potential daughters in law deserve to see you for what you are.

I'm sure that's what your gender studies degree taught you, that it is now fine to discriminate against boys. I don't agree, and I'm guessing your parents can't wait to get you out of their basement, tough guy.

I have top 10 degrees as an undergrad and for law school and you truly have zero clue. What a tragedy that you reproduced. Congratulations on “raising” overpraised, never qualified, entitled, self-pitying boys.

In other words you are one of the elite who has no clue about life. I also went to a top 10 law school, just finished an MBA and am involved in my 2nd FINTEC venture, so there! Nothing crazier than anti-Redshirt posters. SMH

[Anonymous]

People will roll their eyes at "gifted" but do what's best for you (isn't that what you're already doing with redshirting?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Yeah totally after all in this very nation, it was far more common for girls to be formally educated than boys.

Can you please have your posted bronzed - get Galloway to sign it first (he is not a doctor of philosopher or education or science - he’s a business prof who tells people what they want to hear, like a less serious Malcolm Gladwell). If you have a straight son, any potential daughters in law deserve to see you for what you are.

I'm sure that's what your gender studies degree taught you, that it is now fine to discriminate against boys. I don't agree, and I'm guessing your parents can't wait to get you out of their basement, tough guy.

I have top 10 degrees as an undergrad and for law school and you truly have zero clue. What a tragedy that you reproduced. Congratulations on “raising” overpraised, never qualified, entitled, self-pitying boys.

In other words you are one of the elite who has no clue about life. I also went to a top 10 law school, just finished an MBA and am involved in my 2nd FINTEC venture, so there! Nothing crazier than anti-Redshirt posters. SMH

You’re conflating being well-educated as being intelligent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do what is best for your kid. The rest is noise.

I couldn’t agree more

You couldn’t agree more with what is best for you; not you child.

It’s better for your child if another child doesn’t get what they need. You do the same for your child. My child > your child. If it’s ok for you, it’s ok for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Ugh this is such misogyny. Why can’t you myopic, Type A , educated “boy moms” see this??

Because they feel empowered by birthing creatures that will reinforce the power structure, and they’re further and further removed from some of the indignity of misogyny. The women who are concerned about the unfairness they claim boys face are rotten to their daughters and to other women.

What’s wrong? No man will give you the tine of day?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think most boys should be redshirted.

The school environment is made for girls, not boys who have a lot more energy. I redshirted my twins, partly because they were born early, and because we thought that would be best for them. Mine were in gifted classes, but in our school district, gifted is kind of a joke. We've always supplemented with math and reading tutors to keep them challenged.

Scott Galloway, a guy who has a podcast, has stated that one of the ways to make up for the way boys are being disadvantaged in society, is to redshirt them.

Yeah totally after all in this very nation, it was far more common for girls to be formally educated than boys.

Can you please have your posted bronzed - get Galloway to sign it first (he is not a doctor of philosopher or education or science - he’s a business prof who tells people what they want to hear, like a less serious Malcolm Gladwell). If you have a straight son, any potential daughters in law deserve to see you for what you are.

I'm sure that's what your gender studies degree taught you, that it is now fine to discriminate against boys. I don't agree, and I'm guessing your parents can't wait to get you out of their basement, tough guy.

I have top 10 degrees as an undergrad and for law school and you truly have zero clue. What a tragedy that you reproduced. Congratulations on “raising” overpraised, never qualified, entitled, self-pitying boys.

In other words you are one of the elite who has no clue about life. I also went to a top 10 law school, just finished an MBA and am involved in my 2nd FINTEC venture, so there! Nothing crazier than anti-Redshirt posters. SMH

You’re conflating being well-educated as being intelligent.

DP. I kinda think they started it.

Anyway who thinks that boys are all right won't be convinced if reality. Their minds are already made up. Don't even bother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do what is best for your kid. The rest is noise.

I couldn’t agree more

You couldn’t agree more with what is best for you; not you child.

It’s better for your child if another child doesn’t get what they need. You do the same for your child. My child > your child. If it’s ok for you, it’s ok for me.

It’s better for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do what is best for your kid. The rest is noise.

I couldn’t agree more

You couldn’t agree more with what is best for you; not you child.

It’s better for your child if another child doesn’t get what they need. You do the same for your child. My child > your child. If it’s ok for you, it’s ok for me.

It’s better for you.

In what way? Be specific. Since you don’t me at all this ought to be fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do what is best for your kid. The rest is noise.

I couldn’t agree more

You couldn’t agree more with what is best for you; not you child.

It’s better for your child if another child doesn’t get what they need. You do the same for your child. My child > your child. If it’s ok for you, it’s ok for me.

It’s better for you.

In what way? Be specific. Since you don’t me at all this ought to be fun.

Your arrogance makes you so delusional that you believe people should answer your questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do what is best for your kid. The rest is noise.

I couldn’t agree more

You couldn’t agree more with what is best for you; not you child.

It’s better for your child if another child doesn’t get what they need. You do the same for your child. My child > your child. If it’s ok for you, it’s ok for me.

It’s better for you.

In what way? Be specific. Since you don’t me at all this ought to be fun.

Dp

Tell us the ways since you are for it. You wouldn’t do it if it didn’t benefit you.