NP here. The taking on of the mental load is what separates a baby sitter from a parent IMO. I understand that many fathers do not take on planning and managing children related issues, even in dual income families. But they do have to take on some. Deciding to take off at 4 pm once a week to coach a team for 12 weeks or rearranging your schedule to manage pick up every day or taking on the responsibility of dinner on the table 2 or 3 days a week around the kids schedules are all ways dual income fathers prioritize their kids and don’t see them as an accessory. I would hope that SAhM ask the same of their husbands. The truth of the matter is that neither men nor women are prepared for the enormous responsibility of planning every hour of this new helpless being. The more you practice, the better you get, as moms everywhere have learned. Mom occasionally being gone on work trips or working late or early makes Dads figure it out too. My own DH started annotating the family calendar with “sign Larlo up for soccer” and similar simply because he did it so often that he knew the flow and knew what the downsides of not signing up early were. Same as Moms who signed their kids up season after season. |
+1 There are no guarantees in life. Good disability insurance and life insurance is necessary for everyone. Education and skills is a necessity before having kids, even if you want to be a SAHP. Prenups are a good thing especially if you’re entering a marriage with a lot of your own assets. Parents should also think about lifestyle with their career even if they do keep working after kids. I know a nurse who is leaving an abusive spouse. She wants sole custody of her kids due to her spouse’s abusiveness, but her current career experience with 12 hr shift work and variable night shift schedule makes it extremely difficult to manage full time childcare alone. She’s desperately trying to transition into a different kind of nursing that would better match school hours but having difficulty finding a position. |
|
Op, will you actually make a good sahm? Are you organized enough to keep a clean house and organize everyone’s schedules and meals? High energy? Willing to get dirty? Interested in and capable enough to help with teaching the things he wants his kids to learn?
|
Surgeons aren’t going to be able to do these things. It doesn’t matter how much money their wife/husband makes. |
This statement is really truly awful. Are you only working if you get paid? Do you think caring for children and the home not to be vaulable? Op, this person is not the right one. sounds like breaking up even hard is the right thing. He probably would expect you to work and also be the primary parent and take care of the home while he just works. |
Working people aren't always exciting either. |
|
There are some men who simply don’t respect SAHMs, even if they rehearse the boilerplate “it’s the hardest job in the world” rhetoric.
You need to find one who does—he will most likely be traditional but I don’t see an issue with that and think it’s worth the trade off. That what I would do if I were you. |
Why would you assume op couldn't be a good SAHM? And what does 'willing to get dirty' mean? And why the 'interested enough to hep with teaching the things he wants HIS kids to learn? Why are they considered HIS kids? And why aren't you asking if BOTH are interested? Also, she wants to be a mom not a maid. Sure that is part of the job but no one is perfect and your standards seem too high |
Yup, once he realizes how much care actually costs and how much work it is, things change. It’s easy to be 30 and say you want your wife to work. It’s different when you have to take days off to stay with your sick kid, who’s been already sick 3 weeks ago, and your wife is away on a business trip. |
A lot of people, both male and female don't respect SAHM |
No, That is unfair, and asking further questions trouble downthe line. Put your preference in an online profile and see who you attract maybe? Perhaps also try meeting someone who attends an evangelical church? |
If you have children, someone has to take care of them. Not respecting and valuing those care givers, paid or unpaid, seems to me a huge societal problem. |
What an idiotic post. For one thing, nannies aren’t cheap, as multiple posters have pointed out. Secondly, MOST people in the US are “low income” by your standards. The median individual income is about 50k. That’s not enough to do much of anything let alone daycare for 2-3k a month for one infant. You are right to point out that some might be lower income if it makes more financial sense to stay home with the baby. But not everyone can make 150k and if everyone did, their buying power would be less. Our economy requires low income workers. And “don’t have kids if you can’t afford them” will result in an immediate population collapse. We need to make things better for parents and especially mothers in this country. It is not good for infants to be shipped off to daycare at six weeks. If we can offer daycare subsidies, why couldn’t we just give the money to families to allow a parent to stay home longer? I had my kids before I really had a career, so I was definitely in the camp of not working because I couldn’t afford daycare. My husband was supportive of the idea of me being a SAHM but he did not earn much in those early years and it was hard. But I am so glad I had those years with my kids. I went back to work as soon as the youngest was in K and I have an awesome well paying career now with kids in HS. I only wish it did not have to be so hard for us in the early years. |
I find some of the worst ones to be the “feminists” on this board. |
DP. Those are high standards? So the bare minimum is a "high" standard, and yet SAHMs who can't even do that should be respected? You're not exactly helping the lazy perceptions here... Plenty of non-lazy SAHMs can do all of that and more, and do a good job of it. |