I'll never understand wanting to have kids with someone who doesn't do any parenting. I mean, glad it works for you, I just don't get it. |
I have kids and I find people who go on about how having kids is the only way to have meaning come across as protesting too much. Subsuming your entire personality on being a parent sounds like a recipe for disaster. The reality is that you're building an independent person who's going to go off and have their own life. And so it's also important to have your own as well. What that looks like can be up to you. |
+1. Different strokes for different folks. I think I got the best of both worlds. I stayed home for 7 years until the kids were in kindergarten. DH is a civil servant so he never made ridiculous money, but we were always comfortable and have enough savings to maintain our current lifestyle indefinitely. It is 100% doable on a reasonable but not high income. DH works 45 hours a week max. He has always been very involved with the kids" homework, extracurricular activities, laundry, cooking etc. I wouldn't have it any other way. |
So if paid work can't define purpose, why would you put the burden on your spouse to pay all the bills while you find purpose and value?. This means they are spending little to no time on their own purpose and most of it on bills while you spend more of yours on your purpose. Isn't that selfish on your part? |
+1 |
💤 |
I think women know that the SAHM gig becomes a con once the kids are in school, which is one reason why so few would sign up for a role reversal, where they are the breadwinners. Heck, even having a remote-work husband drives many of them batty, whether they are SAHM, WOHM, or remote work themselves. And the idea that a breadwinner wife would have to fork over her 50% of her savings and pay child support to a SAHD in the case of a divorce — inconceivable! |
Are you kidding? I 100% would love to only have to worry about work. DH has it made. And I’ve known at least 3 women who paid alimony and child support post divorce, what are you even on about |
+1 |
|
I didn't persuade my husband to let me be a SAHM. We discussed it and we both decided that it was what was best for our family. He has a very demanding job outside of the home and we agreed that I would stay home and deal with all things kids/house (except maintenance) and animals. He knows his life is much easier because I stay home. He's never called for kid emergencies or has to stay home when they are sick or deal with Dr. appointments.
He also earned about 10x what I did at the time. |
That’s exactly how it was for me. There was no persuading on my part. It allowed him to never say no to anything at work. It made things simple for him. Until he decided he wanted to “pursue his other options” this worked very well. Now I work full time, but still do 100% of things for the kids. He never gets calls from their schools or needs to do doc appointments. Instead of being his wife, I’m now just the paid help who ensures he is never inconvenienced. |
I never said he doesn’t do any parenting. My biggest request is that the time he is off (weekends he’s not on call, vacation time, etc) that is reserved for quality family time. It might be less than most families but we try to make it really quality. He is absolutely an emotionally present parent for the kids, instilling values and emotional support and love. On nights he can’t be home he still FaceTimes the kids to hear about their day. He just doesn’t do any of the slog part of parenting like the housework and extracurricular runs and mental load. Which, to be fair, many working dads don’t do whether they have a SAH parent or not. Plenty of dual-income families are outsourcing most of this work anyway. As a SAHP I just choose to do it myself instead of outsourcing. |
|
|
Extremely well put. “Paid work is for suckers; also, husband, can you spot me a $20?” |