What does the husband have to do with this? |
I would have to. The money is in trust and my kids would not come into it until their 21st birthdays. They are in their mid-teens now. |
|
I know from my family that children of the first marriage feel hurt if all the money goes to the second wife (and her family). It's a kind of a jerk thing to do. In this case, if he was estranged from his kids it's a little more understandable, but ultimately he played a role in that relationship and could have been the bigger person and tried to maintain more contact.
OP, I don't think there's anything for you to do in this situation, but I agree with some others that your mother could leave them at least a little money, since it sounds like she won't use up the money he left her. |
Maybe he can mansplain what to do? |
This is OP. No. One sent flowers. |
|
So he was "in" their lives as long as he was in the lives of your kids.
Of course you don't need to feel guilty or engage with these people but that is like the ultimate dick move he pulled. The money would have gone to your mom regardless, the fact that he purposely put money aside for your kids was just mean. |
He is as surprised as I am. |
|
I was estranged from my dad when he died, and I never thought of trying to get "my share" of his estate. I cut him out of my life when he was alive, and I didn't want his money after he died, either.
His adult children need to get over it. |
Then that’s the burden OP’s children will have to grapple with. It’s not OP’s money. |
You forgot about assumptions. There is an assumption that you would provide for your surviving spouse and children. If you want to disinherit them, you have to provide for that in the will. If you don’t, it is grounds for a contest. OP, I’d ignore them. And only if you get served with a lawsuit or if you are really worried about it would I even bother to call a lawyer. |
Then that was an awful thing for him to do to OP’s children. They have to fight people they don’t know, who never did anything to them. What a gross man! |
NP. That's cold. Hard to muster any sympathy for them being disinherited. |
+1 |
|
To the people who are saying that the adult kids deserve nothing for mistreating their dad, or for checking out of their dad's life, I'd like to urge you to consider that you only have one side of this.
I am sure my dad's wife's kids will be saying similar things when my dad dies and leaves everything to them/his new wife. I also know he has told people that the kids from his first marriage are "spiteful" and are willingly not a part of his life. But the truth is that he abandoned us for his new wife and her kids. We were teens when he married her, and he had no interest in us from that point on: he didn't come to birthdays, graduations, or anything else. When we needed something, we had to plead, and we usually didn't get it. My youngest brother never got braces because dad wouldn't pay, even though older siblings got them and he paid for his new wife's kids' college. We, his first family, took out student loans. We were never invited to his home with her. Oh, and our mom was dead, so that lent an extra note of bitterness to the situation. I am sure we will get nothing. We don't expect it. But I wish people would be a little less quick to assume that everything our dad said is true. Does it REALLY make sense that ALL of his kids willingly checked out of his life? This happens a lot when men remarry. I have reservations about OP's step-dad's story. I think OP should at least talk to the kids and be willing to share. I know my dad's new wife and her family won't do the same for us. |
Yet you don't know what their side of this story is. What if he abandoned them? Would you really expect him to tell his new wife and her family that he had chosen to focus just on his new family and cut ties with the old one? Of course not. Man remarries, first family becomes a burden he'd like to forget. Tale as old as time. There's probably nothing OP can do to make things right, though. |