| I think it's terrible that they are abusing you over this. It wasn't your choice and they had no right to expect anything from the parent with whom they chose not to have a relationship. The fact that they would go out of their way to attack you when you had nothing to do with their father's testamentary choices makes me unsympathetic to them and not particularly surprised that they were disinherited in the first place. |
NP. It is the dad’s story they didn’t want to see him. We honestly don’t know that is the objective truth. I know that some of my siblings have made no effort to see my father, others have been rebuffed by him, and still others (including myself) are periodically just repelled by his actions and words. Right now, all my dad wants to do is to talk bad about his exes. It helps if his kids aren’t around to contradict his version. |
Really? |
Yes, really. It’s my job to love them, not their job to do anything for me. |
| I'd contest that will too. The 3 kids should have been equal inheritors and you could leave yours to the kids. Or at least his kids should have been equal to yours. He was a bad dad to them and owes them |
| I would ignore their calls/emails. If they indicate they are pursuing legal action probably worth it to contact a lawyer of your own and find out what this process usually look like, but I wouldn't assume they will go down that road (it seems to me that it is likely to be expensive and ineffective for them.) I"m sorry, it sounds like a messy situation that really has nothing to do with you. I disagree with the the "come to an equitable agreement on your own" advice and pay them off. These were HIS wishes with HIS money. If his first family was horrible to him and he didn't want to leave them anything that is entirely his right and it would seem disrespectful, after death, to use his money for something he clearly decided not to do. |
|
OP it is his money to do with as he wishes.
No need to take their calls, Lawyer only. |
I doubt the truth of that narrative, and also the reasons behind if it's true. A complete disinheriting is meant to hurt your children as your dying act -- short of something really, really terrible, why would you do that? Not saying that this changes anything about the will, but yes, OP should be a tiny bit more empathetic. |
DP. Your position is inconsistent - you think people should put their kids first when it comes to inheritance issues, but you apparently think the OP (who has herself inherited nothing) should act against her own kids' interests to the benefit of these strangers who are writing her rude emails and with whom she has no relationship even though she was close to their father. |
I would ignore any communication from his kids and tell your own children to do the same. Hopefully your mother will also do this. Absolutely no good can come of speaking with the deceased's children. It might be worth it to consult with the attorney who handled the will/trust (as a representative of your children) to determine how likely it is that there would be a will contest and how likely that it could succeed. But I would not get too worked up over it. |
|
I'd love to hear the legal grounds pps think this will can be contested?
Note, legal grounds does not include the hurt feelings of adult children: The will failed to comply with the statutory requirements for it to be valid, often an issue where wills are handwritten (in whole or in part), unsigned, not witnessed or not notarized Breach of fiduciary duty, for example where a power of attorney does something in their self-interest instead of in the interest of the person they are supposed to be serving Duress (threat of violence, abuse, or other unethical, coercive action) Fraud that affected the details of the will Forgery Misrepresentation Someone used undue influence to ensure that the terms of the will benefited them The person who made the will can be proven to have been mentally ill, incapacitated, or otherwise lacked the capacity to make a will |
| I’m curious did his kids come to his funeral? |
|
OP, do not respond to them. The last thing you want is that if this goes to some kind of litigation with them contesting the will, your words to be used against you. (It's like a Miranda warning -- anything you say WILL be used against you. If you even say you're sorry and you "understand" their frustration, that will be twisted into you "admitting" that they are in the right.)
You don't need to lawyer up until they indicate they are pursuing legal action, unless it's going to make you feel better to talk to a lawyer to advise you about the various scenarios. I really don't understand the PPs who think it's somehow obvious that you need to cut this man's kids in. You don't know them and it was his money. And the fact that they are harassing YOU over it certainly doesn't paint them in a positive light. Besides, his disinheriting them was itself a big middle finger to them. It's not like they'll forgive it if you give them money. So it sounds like a pure shakedown, and unless you encouraged your stepdad to disinherit, you have nothing to be ashamed about. |
|
I’d feel guilty profiting from this messy situation. Nothing good can come from this. Yes, his will, his money blabla but it’s still not right.
I’d try to find an equitable way of splitting the inheritance. |
| Definitely don’t respond to them. Honestly this isn’t your business, it was between your FIL and his kids. You might see if a lawyer could draft something to them asking them not to contact you and to contact the executor or courts or whoever is the appropriate official party. |