Thanks to the party of “family values,” safety nets = socialism. Take care of your kids! They’re your responsibility! Oh, but don’t work. They need their mom! Oh wait, but no, we can’t subsidize you. Bootstraps! I want to vomit just typing all that trash. |
This conversation seems new to you; but it isn't new. We've been having this same conversation since the late 50s. |
I feel that too many people go in to parenthood assuming their lives won’t change. Of course there should be some sacrifices. I’m not saying the woman should bear the brunt of it, but both parents should expect that raising a child will mean that their personal needs will not come first all the time. |
Yes, but until you’re holding that baby in your arms it’s impossible to know how you’re going to feel. Before I had kids I never thought I’d be the SAHM type. Once that baby arrived I was willing to do anything to be able to stay home with him. It’s good to have a plan, but you also need to be flexible enough so you don’t box yourself into a corner and hate your life. |
+1 Also, a lot of women who originally expect to work through their children's early years discover that they really like their kids and don't want to miss out on time with them before they start school. That's what happened to me. I remember thinking "Why would I pay someone to have the joy of spending the day with my child while I go to an office and do a job that is fine but not wonderful and spend half my day pumping milk and also have to deal with my colleagues gossiping behind my back about whether I've mommy tracked or whatever." I didn't want to stop working forever, but I didn't want to give up those baby/small child years. It made it hard to go back though once my kids were in school, and I certainly never went back to my old high pressure, high pay career. I get why people who can afford it opt out forever. |
Have you read any of the other posts? Have you ever been bothered to think about why men are the ones who are paid almost always paid more? If DH doesn’t trust paid caregivers, did he ever once contemplate caring for his kids himself? Why not sock some of that money away and take a few years off? No? Worried about re-entering after? Hmmm. |
|
Our pregnancy was not planned. BF (now DH) said if you want to go back to work that is fine and if you want to stay home that is fine.
Yes the money was nice, but we weren’t sacrificing by me staying at home. It just made sense. The big benefit for us was the freedom. DH can work from anywhere. We were able to travel a lot, spend summers at the beach. And in retrospect it helped our sex life. I didn’t have work stress on top of baby stress. Didn’t need to run around or coordinate as much. |
I believe most women know whether or not they want to/ have to continue working after having kids long before the child arrives. Men may feel differently. My dh and I both agreed that I would sah and we planned and saved for years beforehand. Although I, at times, wished I could go back to work because sah was really hard, I never changed my mind. |
Why do you sound so angry? I answered the OPs question. DH makes more because he’s in finance and I’m in a different industry. I could never make the money anyone in his field makes, male or female. |
+1 |
Bingo. As a woman you have to actively push back against this norm. It's hard. I did not succeed in doing it. I hope my daughters will. |
These are the worst types - men who want their wives to make a lot of money but also expect them to handle everything at home and prioritize the mans career over the woman’s. |
I agree. |
| I expected my wife to work, but she didn't, and it was a gigantic source of conflict. |
You two aren't really answering the original question. Thi sthread isn't about Deciding to be a SAHM. This is about the expectation that you do it because you're a woman. |