Kate spending time with "birth family"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re at the same school still, the kids are out until next week I think, then they finish up July 3rd. And I think next year George goes to Eton (probably).

Kate did not want George to go to Eton.

Well soon that won't matter.

WTF does that mean. There is absolutely no indication that she is dying, just because she prefers to keep her health information private. And no wonder! Geez.

DP. She might not be dying but if she hasn’t figured out that whatever William and his family says it won’t matter because they’ll be divorced.

Divorced or dead by end of 2024. Sadly.

But good that it’s resolved before a succession if/when Charles also passes.

How does wanting privacy equal dead or divorced?

You are still presuming the truth in what the BRF has put out there — that Kate is in a position to want privacy. I can’t speak for everyone else, but I am so suspicious of this whole thing because 1) there’s been multiple lies that have been perpetrated and now proven to be not true (eg, Kate does not have cancer, Kate will be back by Easter, wild photoshopping incident, etc), 2) this is a family that has historically discarded the wife / placed all importance into the heir to the throne, 3) this woman has literally not been seen in public nor on any kind of live broadcast for 5 straight months now — this is completely unprecedented by a member of the senior royal family.

So the question to me isn’t whether she is entitled to privacy, but rather back to the original question — I am still wondering if she’s ok at all.

Totally different from the Black Panther situation, and I don’t think is an apples to apples comparison. I had no curiosity about that whatsoever.

9am
How about this...they were hopeful that she would be back by Easter but she is not feeling well enough so they adjusted. That isn't lying.

Why do you think you deserve the whole truth in very intimate detail? We don't even know King Charles! I think Princess Catherine deserves more privacy.

DP. PP isn’t wrong to not give them the benefit of the doubt considering that her announcement came after a ton of lies and a doctored photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re at the same school still, the kids are out until next week I think, then they finish up July 3rd. And I think next year George goes to Eton (probably).

Kate did not want George to go to Eton.

Well soon that won't matter.

WTF does that mean. There is absolutely no indication that she is dying, just because she prefers to keep her health information private. And no wonder! Geez.

DP. She might not be dying but if she hasn’t figured out that whatever William and his family says it won’t matter because they’ll be divorced.

Divorced or dead by end of 2024. Sadly.

But good that it’s resolved before a succession if/when Charles also passes.

How does wanting privacy equal dead or divorced?

You are still presuming the truth in what the BRF has put out there — that Kate is in a position to want privacy. I can’t speak for everyone else, but I am so suspicious of this whole thing because 1) there’s been multiple lies that have been perpetrated and now proven to be not true (eg, Kate does not have cancer, Kate will be back by Easter, wild photoshopping incident, etc), 2) this is a family that has historically discarded the wife / placed all importance into the heir to the throne, 3) this woman has literally not been seen in public nor on any kind of live broadcast for 5 straight months now — this is completely unprecedented by a member of the senior royal family.

So the question to me isn’t whether she is entitled to privacy, but rather back to the original question — I am still wondering if she’s ok at all.

Totally different from the Black Panther situation, and I don’t think is an apples to apples comparison. I had no curiosity about that whatsoever.

She has been seen in public- the media is not snapping pictures of it because they are trying to respect her privacy. Also she didn’t have cancer when she first went in for surgery- the cancer was an incidental finding. Take off the tin foil hat and try to find something productive to obsess over - like Taylor and Travis…

We don't know that either. We don't know a thing about the surgery she had in the first place

You aren’t entitled to know any of it.

And you and the RF aren't entitled to tell people to stop speculating.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

Kate said (in the video) that they waited to announce her diagnosis until the kids’ school break. Wouldn’t their classmates and teachers call it out if they had not actually been in school?

Not really. Their school is ultra private and full of aristocratic students and teachers who want to be in good standing with the royal family. They all need to get with the program as they are underlings of the crown . They aren’t going to a neighborhood school with random kids

I still think someone would have leaked to the press (although maybe the entire school and press are covering for her?)

DP. Idk how does it benefit them to leak it though?

[Anonymous]

Why “Birth family” instead of “parents “?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Wikipedia says he died without a will so maybe he was not expecting his death.

I think he married his GF so his money would probably automatically go to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why “Birth family” instead of “parents “?

I don't know. Ask the guy who wrote the article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If her cancer was found incidentally during an abdominal surgery, it’s very possible they found it early enough. Preventative chemo is more than a couple weeks.

My BIL was on it for years and lived a normal life with no complications.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime. Just how nasty are you? I am thinking to report you to Jeff. You sound like the worst narc here.

He knew the HIGH significance of this role and probably already had enough money to secure his family financially. And if Disney had known he was stage 4 colon cancer they probably would have chosen some one else for the role. Thank you for agreeing with me he was selfish in taking the role.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that no news is good news about Kate's health for now. She is recovering in private. If we don't hear any update from the BRF by January 2025, could we be bit worried about her?

In my view, if we don’t hear something more definite in the fall, then she either is dying or they have basically separated.

Do you remember the story last October that they would be spending more and more time apart? It seemed very sketchy and leaked from inside the palace.

Maybe now it makes a bit more sense. Were they planning to lead separate lives, separated and then she found out she had this cancer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that no news is good news about Kate's health for now. She is recovering in private. If we don't hear any update from the BRF by January 2025, could we be bit worried about her?

In my view, if we don’t hear something more definite in the fall, then she either is dying or they have basically separated.

Do you remember the story last October that they would be spending more and more time apart? It seemed very sketchy and leaked from inside the palace.

Maybe now it makes a bit more sense. Were they planning to lead separate lives, separated and then she found out she had this cancer?

That was my theory. Being sick can bring people together but it can also be that final wake up call.

[Anonymous]

I am happy she's with her family. His family are snakes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime. Just how nasty are you? I am thinking to report you to Jeff. You sound like the worst narc here.

He knew the HIGH significance of this role and probably already had enough money to secure his family financially. And if Disney had known he was stage 4 colon cancer they probably would have chosen some one else for the role. Thank you for agreeing with me he was selfish in taking the role.

I disagree because he did a good job and just look at Batman. All the franchise leads are replaceable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime. Just how nasty are you? I am thinking to report you to Jeff. You sound like the worst narc here.

He knew the HIGH significance of this role and probably already had enough money to secure his family financially. And if Disney had known he was stage 4 colon cancer they probably would have chosen some one else for the role. Thank you for agreeing with me he was selfish in taking the role.

DP. It’s not selfish because it’s like the easiest role to recast. Did you even watch the film? The Black Panther is basically a royal title. Anyone can eat those magic flowers and voila.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime. Just how nasty are you? I am thinking to report you to Jeff. You sound like the worst narc here.

He knew the HIGH significance of this role and probably already had enough money to secure his family financially. And if Disney had known he was stage 4 colon cancer they probably would have chosen some one else for the role. Thank you for agreeing with me he was selfish in taking the role.

DP. It’s not selfish because it’s like the easiest role to recast. Did you even watch the film? The Black Panther is basically a royal title. Anyone can eat those magic flowers and voila.

I am sure they had plans to have multiple movies made with him as the lead. And when they replace the hero, they start from zero telling the story. How many Spiderman movies have we had told from day 1 with a new hero? In this case they wrote his death into the film.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re at the same school still, the kids are out until next week I think, then they finish up July 3rd. And I think next year George goes to Eton (probably).

Kate did not want George to go to Eton.

Well soon that won't matter.

WTF does that mean. There is absolutely no indication that she is dying, just because she prefers to keep her health information private. And no wonder! Geez.

DP. She might not be dying but if she hasn’t figured out that whatever William and his family says it won’t matter because they’ll be divorced.

Divorced or dead by end of 2024. Sadly.

But good that it’s resolved before a succession if/when Charles also passes.

How does wanting privacy equal dead or divorced?

You are still presuming the truth in what the BRF has put out there — that Kate is in a position to want privacy. I can’t speak for everyone else, but I am so suspicious of this whole thing because 1) there’s been multiple lies that have been perpetrated and now proven to be not true (eg, Kate does not have cancer, Kate will be back by Easter, wild photoshopping incident, etc), 2) this is a family that has historically discarded the wife / placed all importance into the heir to the throne, 3) this woman has literally not been seen in public nor on any kind of live broadcast for 5 straight months now — this is completely unprecedented by a member of the senior royal family.

So the question to me isn’t whether she is entitled to privacy, but rather back to the original question — I am still wondering if she’s ok at all.

Totally different from the Black Panther situation, and I don’t think is an apples to apples comparison. I had no curiosity about that whatsoever.

She has been seen in public- the media is not snapping pictures of it because they are trying to respect her privacy. Also she didn’t have cancer when she first went in for surgery- the cancer was an incidental finding. Take off the tin foil hat and try to find something productive to obsess over - like Taylor and Travis…

We don't know that either. We don't know a thing about the surgery she had in the first place

You aren’t entitled to know any of it.

And you and the RF aren't entitled to tell people to stop speculating.

Stop speculating.

I guess I am entitled to say it.