Kate spending time with "birth family"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up… the farm stand video was a body double?

yes, more details here, from Spanish journalist:
https://www.reddit.com/r/KateMiddletonMissing/comments/1cypaz2/

Did the palace really hire Kate's body double for the farm video?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up… the farm stand video was a body double?

yes, more details here, from Spanish journalist:
https://www.reddit.com/r/KateMiddletonMissing/comments/1cypaz2/

I’m sorry but I like this journalist. She didn’t back down and hasn’t let the Palace and its sycophant supporters bully her. She brings detail with her stories . She has a name for the body double and everything and you know what? It all checks out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate seem like good coworkers, even though there is no romantic affection shown in public. There’s plenty of videos of either one recoiling at the other’s touch. Given that discreet affairs are normalized among royals/rich in general, i really don’t think Kate’s leaving anytime soon. William would be stupid to toss her aside knowing that she’s accepted the situation and does relatively well in the job.

They’ve got three adorable kids and at least three estates in different parts of the country. They can easily live very comfortable separate lives and remain professional partners as king/queen.

Right. And I think they were doing that up until last year right?

Unless someone wants something else out of the relationship? Is that what’s happening?

Why the soft rollout of Rose?
Why is Camilla taking that woman under her wing? What is Camilla up to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up… the farm stand video was a body double?

yes, more details here, from Spanish journalist:
https://www.reddit.com/r/KateMiddletonMissing/comments/1cypaz2/

I’m sorry but I like this journalist. She didn’t back down and hasn’t let the Palace and its sycophant supporters bully her. She brings detail with her stories . She has a name for the body double and everything and you know what? It all checks out

Agree. There’s definitely something there.
It could just be a simple as her source is the Spanish Nanny and she knows more about the troubled marriage then she should??

[Anonymous]

The palace could sue her if she’s lying but they refuse to call her bluff with lawsuit. The nanny for the kids is Spanish/from Spain and apparently she stopped working in January , shortly before Concha put out the initial coma story . Why was the nanny let go/fired? Because she was chatting to the Spanish press?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hold up… the farm stand video was a body double?

did you see the video? it 100% was not Kate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Maybe he just wanted to earn some money to leave to his family? Even if he did not have kids, money earned can secure his parents and siblings for the lifetime. Just how nasty are you? I am thinking to report you to Jeff. You sound like the worst narc here.

He knew the HIGH significance of this role and probably already had enough money to secure his family financially. And if Disney had known he was stage 4 colon cancer they probably would have chosen some one else for the role. Thank you for agreeing with me he was selfish in taking the role.

DP. It’s not selfish because it’s like the easiest role to recast. Did you even watch the film? The Black Panther is basically a royal title. Anyone can eat those magic flowers and voila.

I am sure they had plans to have multiple movies made with him as the lead. And when they replace the hero, they start from zero telling the story. How many Spiderman movies have we had told from day 1 with a new hero? In this case they wrote his death into the film.

Not true that they start from zero. Michael Gambon pretended he was the original Dumbledore, helped by that huge beard and costumes. Other storylines took over from Ned Stark's story line. Meryl Streep bowed out of a starring role in Mamma Mia 2 (returning for a small ghost bit). Dr Who regenerates every few seasons - they've just started with the 15th doctor. Sesame Street explained that Mr Hooper died. Other series kill off characters when it suits or when actors get too demanding or when the actor dies in real life.

Marvel Universe almost always starts with new lead. Spider-Man, Toby, Andy, Tom, etc.