Kate spending time with "birth family"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hold on, are we now at the point where we think a future King went Brad Bishop one night?

No, but there are many who think he did harm her and that is the reason for the hospital visit and December initially. The younger children may have witnessed and they cannot risk anyone asking them questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why “Birth family” instead of “parents “?

Maybe she’s having a baby and is staying with the child’s father?

Why has this forum got so weird this weekend? Is it bored kids?

The royals threads always go off the rails.

It goes off of the rails because a cohort of incredibly envious women get pleasure out of the attractive and composed Kate Middleton suffering. It’s that, and it’s always been that. It’s tiresome and transparent.

+100
This is a woman who has never harmed anyone and by all accounts seems to be a good person. The crazy speculation and conspiracy rumors - especially about her cancer - are beyond disgusting. You have wonder what kind of people enjoy the suffering of others, especially a mother of three. Typical DCUM jealous harpies.

That’s why normal people don’t have their wedding televised or hold a photo opp a few days after giving birth. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

“Die by the sword” - what are you talking about??? Are you saying any celebrity that televises their wedding or sells their baby photos to People loses their right to privacy? “Sorry Meghan Markle, you televised your wedding. Hand over your OBGYN records.”

No one is asking for Kate's medical records. It is bizarre that they have been so opaque about her illness, liked multiple times to try and make it seem like everything is fine, and continue to push back her reappearance. She is a public person.

And yes, when you get married on television and regularly parade your family in front of cameras in order to justify your position and your wealth, you do in fact sacrifice some amount of privacy. No one is asking for her medical records, but people are asking for a straight answer to simple questions and the BRF refuses to give one. You say she has cancer? Well it took them months to say that.

They've lost a lot of credibility with a lot of people and all the speculation and conspiracy mongering is the result. This is not a criticism of Kate. It is a criticism of their press office and the way the family as an institution has handled this situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold on, are we now at the point where we think a future King went Brad Bishop one night?

No, but there are many who think he did harm her and that is the reason for the hospital visit and December initially. The younger children may have witnessed and they cannot risk anyone asking them questions.

If he harmed her why would she go on camera and say it was cancer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s both.
The separation happened last year.

And the negotiations went awry in late December? She’s sick….and obv everything at a standstill.

Or she’s just sick and he’s just a dick. There’s that too.

And for all of you thinking ppl like me are attacking her, we are all on Team Kate. Could care less about the BRF or William.

This. Just because we question the cancer diagnosis, the video, photos, etc. does not mean that we’re not on her side.

Just the fact that Rose is having a more prominent role around Camilla despite all of this going on shows a lack of respect for Kate. They all know everyone is talking about it whether or not it is true. Why continue to fuel the fire if Kate is really sick?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold on, are we now at the point where we think a future King went Brad Bishop one night?

No, but there are many who think he did harm her and that is the reason for the hospital visit and December initially. The younger children may have witnessed and they cannot risk anyone asking them questions.

If he harmed her why would she go on camera and say it was cancer?

That sounds like the people questioning why Cassie didn’t come forward sooner about Diddy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah I actually don’t care about what her health problems are at all; so for all those saying she’s entitled to her health privacy — sure. Sounds great. I just want to know for certain whether she’s still even alive. This is not a situation where journalists have seen her and are not posting pictures out of respect — US media like TMZ doesn’t give a s* about privacy concerns. She hasn’t been seen speaking in public for months. No one can retort that this is totally unprecedented for a senior member of the BRF. Her two younger kids haven’t been seen either since Dec 2023, when they previously were photographed at least once or twice a month. I honestly don’t know how those who support her and her privacy can delude themselves into thinking this is totally normal and there is nothing suspicious at all about this.

Why is it your business if she is alive?

It’s my business because if she’s not, that would mean a cover up of massive proportions that implicate the very agencies (read: media, and heads of state) that are supposed to be informing the world of truths and realities. If we can’t trust our news agencies to reliably report or investigate the truth of even the life of a woman who married into famous family, there are far worse implications for things that actually matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you speculating this is a cover for divorcing, so you actually think the Royal PR Machine promoted or is going along with a fake statement about cancer just so they can later announce that the next King is leaving his cancer-ridden wife???

omfg

Lol, kind of falls apart when you apply logic, doesn't it!

They aren't bound by reason. Or sanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has cancer. That’s all you need to know. Leave her alone and live your own actual life.

Wise words. I honestly can’t believe the people on here. They must have seriously sad lives to speculate and make up stories about a woman with small children who has repeatedly asked to be left alone as she deals with chemo.

Why are you in this thread then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s both.
The separation happened last year.

And the negotiations went awry in late December? She’s sick….and obv everything at a standstill.

Or she’s just sick and he’s just a dick. There’s that too.

And for all of you thinking ppl like me are attacking her, we are all on Team Kate. Could care less about the BRF or William.

This. Just because we question the cancer diagnosis, the video, photos, etc. does not mean that we’re not on her side.

Just the fact that Rose is having a more prominent role around Camilla despite all of this going on shows a lack of respect for Kate. They all know everyone is talking about it whether or not it is true. Why continue to fuel the fire if Kate is really sick?

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why “Birth family” instead of “parents “?

Maybe she’s having a baby and is staying with the child’s father?

Why has this forum got so weird this weekend? Is it bored kids?

The royals threads always go off the rails.

It goes off of the rails because a cohort of incredibly envious women get pleasure out of the attractive and composed Kate Middleton suffering. It’s that, and it’s always been that. It’s tiresome and transparent.

+100
This is a woman who has never harmed anyone and by all accounts seems to be a good person. The crazy speculation and conspiracy rumors - especially about her cancer - are beyond disgusting. You have wonder what kind of people enjoy the suffering of others, especially a mother of three. Typical DCUM jealous harpies.

That’s why normal people don’t have their wedding televised or hold a photo opp a few days after giving birth. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

“Die by the sword” - what are you talking about??? Are you saying any celebrity that televises their wedding or sells their baby photos to People loses their right to privacy? “Sorry Meghan Markle, you televised your wedding. Hand over your OBGYN records.”

Such a drama queen. No one is asking for videos of her chemo or her bag.No one is asking for her medical records. An occasional and honest update to stop the speculation is all that’s needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has cancer. That’s all you need to know. Leave her alone and live your own actual life.

Wise words. I honestly can’t believe the people on here. They must have seriously sad lives to speculate and make up stories about a woman with small children who has repeatedly asked to be left alone as she deals with chemo.

Why are you in this thread then?

DP. Why are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah I actually don’t care about what her health problems are at all; so for all those saying she’s entitled to her health privacy — sure. Sounds great. I just want to know for certain whether she’s still even alive. This is not a situation where journalists have seen her and are not posting pictures out of respect — US media like TMZ doesn’t give a s* about privacy concerns. She hasn’t been seen speaking in public for months. No one can retort that this is totally unprecedented for a senior member of the BRF. Her two younger kids haven’t been seen either since Dec 2023, when they previously were photographed at least once or twice a month. I honestly don’t know how those who support her and her privacy can delude themselves into thinking this is totally normal and there is nothing suspicious at all about this.

Why is it your business if she is alive?

It’s my business because if she’s not, that would mean a cover up of massive proportions that implicate the very agencies (read: media, and heads of state) that are supposed to be informing the world of truths and realities. If we can’t trust our news agencies to reliably report or investigate the truth of even the life of a woman who married into famous family, there are far worse implications for things that actually matter.

That seems very far fetched. Can you think of an example (from real life, not the movies) where media and heads of state went to such lengths to deceive the public that a public figure was alive when they were in fact dead? And why, exactly, would they do this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah I actually don’t care about what her health problems are at all; so for all those saying she’s entitled to her health privacy — sure. Sounds great. I just want to know for certain whether she’s still even alive. This is not a situation where journalists have seen her and are not posting pictures out of respect — US media like TMZ doesn’t give a s* about privacy concerns. She hasn’t been seen speaking in public for months. No one can retort that this is totally unprecedented for a senior member of the BRF. Her two younger kids haven’t been seen either since Dec 2023, when they previously were photographed at least once or twice a month. I honestly don’t know how those who support her and her privacy can delude themselves into thinking this is totally normal and there is nothing suspicious at all about this.

Why is it your business if she is alive?

Is a curiosity, like a Kardashian. Anyone who puts themselves out there like that deserves the negative attention that comes with the positive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah I actually don’t care about what her health problems are at all; so for all those saying she’s entitled to her health privacy — sure. Sounds great. I just want to know for certain whether she’s still even alive. This is not a situation where journalists have seen her and are not posting pictures out of respect — US media like TMZ doesn’t give a s* about privacy concerns. She hasn’t been seen speaking in public for months. No one can retort that this is totally unprecedented for a senior member of the BRF. Her two younger kids haven’t been seen either since Dec 2023, when they previously were photographed at least once or twice a month. I honestly don’t know how those who support her and her privacy can delude themselves into thinking this is totally normal and there is nothing suspicious at all about this.

When someone dies in the Uk, there is a publicly available death certificate, even for the Queen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why “Birth family” instead of “parents “?

Maybe she’s having a baby and is staying with the child’s father?

Why has this forum got so weird this weekend? Is it bored kids?

The royals threads always go off the rails.

It goes off of the rails because a cohort of incredibly envious women get pleasure out of the attractive and composed Kate Middleton suffering. It’s that, and it’s always been that. It’s tiresome and transparent.

+100
This is a woman who has never harmed anyone and by all accounts seems to be a good person. The crazy speculation and conspiracy rumors - especially about her cancer - are beyond disgusting. You have wonder what kind of people enjoy the suffering of others, especially a mother of three. Typical DCUM jealous harpies.

That’s why normal people don’t have their wedding televised or hold a photo opp a few days after giving birth. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

“Die by the sword” - what are you talking about??? Are you saying any celebrity that televises their wedding or sells their baby photos to People loses their right to privacy? “Sorry Meghan Markle, you televised your wedding. Hand over your OBGYN records.”

Yes, pretty much nailed it.

Same with politicians and high profile people in general. Don't INTENTIONALLY seek this type of attention and then complain about it, Kate and Meghan. You are two smart women who literally signed up for this.