Lochte Robbery Story: True or False

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone point me to the evidence of vandalism? I keep reading that the police have said this, but what exactly did they do?

They broke the soap dispenser in the bathroom. And broke the lock or hinges on the door, apparently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread has been infiltrated by the usual Fairfax Underground knuckledraggers. Lochte is a disgrace--your defense of him is not surprising though.

Please. There is absolutely no one on this thread who sounds like they came from Fairfax Underground.

Many of us think Lochte is a complete dumbass, but a) was robbed (AS VIDEO BACKS UP) & b) doesn't deserve to be trapped in Brazil over this.

Well, he's not trapped in Brasil so I guess he's come out ahead on it all.

You actually do sound like a FFU if you remotely believe that these assholes were robbed or that they deserve no consequences.

Agree. These idiots thought they could get out of whatever crap they pulled due to the incompetent authorities and their general arrogance. Too bad for them.

By paying for it. That usually works.

Agree. If they damaged a door and peed outside, usually money will cover you for that sort of "crap."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

No shit. You're validating the point that Brazil is corrupt.

[Anonymous]

The streets of Rio are basically a river of piss already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone point me to the evidence of vandalism? I keep reading that the police have said this, but what exactly did they do?

They broke the soap dispenser in the bathroom. And broke the lock or hinges on the door, apparently.

Holy shit, no! They broke the soap dispenser??? That's almost too horrible to be believed. Is there any proof? Whatsoever?

If it's indeed true that a soap dispenser was damaged, then no wonder Brazil is turning this into an international incident!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

Exactly. When in Rio, you can be detained and arrested for anything or nothing. Crime is rampant, including throughout the police.

Yep. Sounds like a corrupt, crime-ridden shithole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

No shit. You're validating the point that Brazil is corrupt.

You just are not a smart person.

[Anonymous]

Whatever the real story, the Brazilian police really did handle this badly. I'm sure a lot of people are thinking twice about visiting and concluding it's not worth the risk.

The thing that's got me was the part in the video where they're all getting out of the taxi with their wallets out. No thanks.

[Anonymous]

This whole thing reminds me of that one time Brian Williams landed his chopper under sniper fire that was awesome

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole thing reminds me of that one time Brian Williams landed his chopper under sniper fire that was awesome

Except this time there's video proof showing the swimmers with their hands up, and handing over money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

No shit. You're validating the point that Brazil is corrupt.

You just are not a smart person.

Not PP, but why does anyone think just insulting someone's intelligence (by itself without providing any further substantive comment) is worthwhile or interesting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever the real story, the Brazilian police really did handle this badly. I'm sure a lot of people are thinking twice about visiting and concluding it's not worth the risk.

The thing that's got me was the part in the video where they're all getting out of the taxi with their wallets out. No thanks.

hahahaha that's the part that disturbed you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

No shit. You're validating the point that Brazil is corrupt.

You just are not a smart person.

Oh? Does the truth hurt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

No shit. You're validating the point that Brazil is corrupt.

You just are not a smart person.

Not PP, but why does anyone think just insulting someone's intelligence (by itself without providing any further substantive comment) is worthwhile or interesting?

Standard response when poster has no actual evidence or response.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And actually you can't trash talk the queen of England with impunity so, no. They have very strict laws there about this.

You see Sparky, American laws and culture only apply in America.

No shit. You're validating the point that Brazil is corrupt.

You just are not a smart person.

Not PP, but why does anyone think just insulting someone's intelligence (by itself without providing any further substantive comment) is worthwhile or interesting?

It's the reply that is the insult to intelligence, actually.