Kate spending time with "birth family"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

Usually middle of July

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

How do you know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Wikipedia says he died without a will so maybe he was not expecting his death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

Ok, and I am entitled to say that I believe they are lying.

You are just not that important. Nobody cares. Certainly not the Royal family!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

These are off topic. Please start a different thread.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

Wikipedia says he died without a will so maybe he was not expecting his death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? No appearances till end of year? Have known many friends with cancer and during treatment they were not living at their parents.

Dear God. Please leave this woman alone. She has a right to a zone of privacy just as you have! She is undergoing preventative chemo and it is probably making her very sick judging by people I know who have undergone chemo.

Why shouldn't she be spending time with her parents and siblings? These are people whom she knows are there to help her and respect her privacy from buzzards like you who want to speculate and pick her bones.

SHAME ON YOU!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? No appearances till end of year? Have known many friends with cancer and during treatment they were not living at their parents.

Dear God. Please leave this woman alone. She has a right to a zone of privacy just as you have! She is undergoing preventative chemo and it is probably making her very sick judging by people I know who have undergone chemo.

Why shouldn't she be spending time with her parents and siblings? These are people whom she knows are there to help her and respect her privacy from buzzards like you who want to speculate and pick her bones.

SHAME ON YOU!

Wait will you find out you've been duped by the BRF!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re at the same school still, the kids are out until next week I think, then they finish up July 3rd. And I think next year George goes to Eton (probably).

Kate did not want George to go to Eton.

Well soon that won't matter.

WTF does that mean. There is absolutely no indication that she is dying, just because she prefers to keep her health information private. And no wonder! Geez.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

Kate said (in the video) that they waited to announce her diagnosis until the kids’ school break. Wouldn’t their classmates and teachers call it out if they had not actually been in school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

Kate said (in the video) that they waited to announce her diagnosis until the kids’ school break. Wouldn’t their classmates and teachers call it out if they had not actually been in school?

Not really. Their school is ultra private and full of aristocratic students and teachers who want to be in good standing with the royal family. They all need to get with the program as they are underlings of the crown . They aren’t going to a neighborhood school with random kids

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been through cancer with numerous relatives, friends, colleagues and patients (I’ve been in healthcare for a decade now).

Most of the people I’ve known who had cancer while still in their working years continued working, at least part time, while undergoing treatments. Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Alex Trebek are two examples of wealthy people who nevertheless worked throughout cancer treatment.

Kate is either taking full advantage of her royal privilege by quitting work entirely, or her cancer is very much more serious than her announcement let on.

Why shouldn't she? I sure as hell would. Also, as far as I know, RBG and Alex Trebek did not have three young children. You sound like a jerk.

Stop acting like Kate has literally zero help and no privacy. She has an entire private estate on which to roam with cooks, maids and Nannies at her beck and call. She is not some Average woman going through chemo with real life scenarios to deal with.

Yes it isn't private when people like you who have zero idea of what is happening make disparaging remarks. Or the British press talk about her. So she has help her kids still need their mother.

Princess Kate and all Her hired help sends you thanks for defending her so fiercely bored American housewife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

How do you know?

She got the inside scoop from her tinfoil hat

[Anonymous]

Forgive me if this has been covered, but the only thing I found weird about this was the use of the term "birth family," which I have only ever heard in the context of adoption. It was just an odd way to say she was going to be spending her time with the Middletons (which makes perfect sense to me and also is not my business).

Is this a British thing? Do people in the UK use the term "birth family" to refer to your family if origin, as distinct from the family you marry into?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re at the same school still, the kids are out until next week I think, then they finish up July 3rd. And I think next year George goes to Eton (probably).

Kate did not want George to go to Eton.

Well soon that won't matter.

WTF does that mean. There is absolutely no indication that she is dying, just because she prefers to keep her health information private. And no wonder! Geez.

DP. She might not be dying but if she hasn’t figured out that whatever William and his family says it won’t matter because they’ll be divorced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

How do you know this?

Read the British press.

Provide even one link that says that the children have not been in school.