I’d like to remind you that virtually all of the United States occupies the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples, many of whom did not and do not observe what you refer to as “first-world practices” with respect to family naming. While it’s apparently important to you that you get to express your opinions and perspectives, it’s equally important that you do so with respect for the host peoples and their values. Behaving as though those peoples and traditions do not exist or are not relevant doesn’t contribute to productive conversations. Indigenous naming traditions are deeply rooted and have practical benefits. You lecturing as if a subset of white European-originating practices are the only ones that matter is some racist bs. |
Thank you, PP. |
I am a birthright United States citizen and your thinly veiled Trumpist threats about my “green card” don’t scare me. They are also an embarrassment to the idea of America as a nation of laws. Get bent. |
LOL I did not change my name and my family has been here for centuries. It hasn’t been a problem. Ever. |
“I’d like to remind you.” You culture deniers are in grave danger, I tell you what. |
First world practices? Iceland - no. Spain - no. Austria - no. France - not for legal documents or life events. Greece - no. Italy - no. Korea - no. Taiwan - no |
You're talking to multiple different people, toots. Oh no, now you'll tell the coppers about my snarky 1930s slang. |
While it's important to respect indigenous naming traditions, it's worth noting that the 85% statistic includes data from all marriages in the United States, encompassing various cultural practices. The reference to 'first-world practices' aimed to highlight a common custom within certain demographic groups. This tradition doesn't negate the significance of other naming practices but addresses a specific cultural practice prevalent in the country. |
The point being made is that we are discussing naming practices within the context of the United States. While naming customs can vary from country to country, the reference to "first-world practices" was specific to the prevalence of women taking their husband's last name upon marriage within certain demographic groups in the United States. It's important to address the topic within its relevant cultural context. |
While it's great to hear that you've had no issues with your naming choice, it's essential to remember that individual experiences can vary widely. One person's experience doesn't necessarily reflect the broader trends and practices within the United States. Naming customs can vary among families and communities, and what works for one person may not apply universally. The 85% statistic is based on a more extensive sample size and reflects a common naming tradition observed by a significant portion of the population. |
DP. No, it's important to live and let live. None of this affects you at all, PP, and yet you appear oddly consumed by it.
You were the one using ChatGPT, weren't you? Are you still doing that? |
PS: Oh yeah, I see that you are. That's really a weird habit. |
I understand the need for a respectful and constructive discussion, and I appreciate your perspective on this matter. It's essential to maintain a respectful tone and avoid political attacks, as this conversation is about cultural practices and traditions. However, there seems to be some confusion in your previous posts. You mentioned "in your country" when discussing naming traditions, which led to the assumption that you might have had experiences in another country. If you are a birthright United States citizen, that's perfectly fine, and there's no need to present different perspectives. Let's focus on the cultural aspects and traditions we are discussing without delving into political discussions or attacks. It's important to engage in open and respectful dialogue to better understand each other's viewpoints and foster a productive conversation. Additionally, please refrain from bringing up political references as they are not relevant to this conversation. |
LOL you are funny |
Are you a bot? You sound like one. |