Why so many single men not interested in dating?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm seeing a lot of men over 35 who have never been married, have no kids and/or are divorced, but have no interest whatsoever in dating. And there is nothing wrong with these men. They are employed, their mental health is okay, they just want to remain single. Why??

They want to go to Dewey Beach, hang out at the only two bars in town and pickup in 21 year old girls. They not men. They’re little boys.

You meant to say 21 year old "women "

[Anonymous]

This area is full of former military men who would do better if they move back to where they are from. Women here are not interested in dating them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

[Anonymous]

Accountability? What's that? Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

Yes he likely wasted fertility for couple girlfriends in his own age group at least. Now he wants a new ticket with that same age group but aged out himself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

Listen - if women he dated in his 20s need to take responsibility for dating him, then he should take responsibility for not being able to get hitched to anyone within 27-32 yo age range on time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Women here don’t “demand “ high salaries - they make these salaries themselves and have realistic view and experience at what life costs in dmv.
This forum leans to 40-50s age group

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I absolutely agree with this and I would add that if you're not moving around wealthy circles, your chances with someone making the kind of salary described here are pretty low, even among older men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Women here don’t “demand “ high salaries - they make these salaries themselves and have realistic view and experience at what life costs in dmv.
This forum leans to 40-50s age group

I'm a woman a the salaries described here are absolutely ridiculous even by DMV standards. That kind of salary is made by a very small percentage of the population, even if educated and 40+. Also, people with these salaries live very expensive lives without realizing they're actually in a bubble and that the lifestyle they want isn't the norm. You can pursue whoever you want but you also need to realize that a man's inability to make 200k+ isn't a moral failing on his part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The majority of women don’t bring much of anything to a relationship. Even if they are attractive their looks will fade. There is no reason for men to pursue a relationship unless they can financially benefit. It is worthwhile if you can marry a high earner or someone who has family money.

For a professionally and financially successful, mature, educated and physically highly attractive man--which is basically all the women who complain about the dating market are looking for--they don't need a woman who is career focused. These men have that covered already. They want a woman who is attractive, highly sexual but monogamous and loyal, and willing to have children and raise them including if that means putting their career on hold for at least a few years while the children are young.

If a woman is able and willing to bring those things to the table then she won't have any problems at all finding a decent man

No, you don't have to be a virgin, but a high body count is a huge red flag. Lying about your body count or shaming the man for caring about your body count is a deal breaker for these men.

You cant find a suitable man to seriously date you because you are woefully under qualified.

Well dayum! 🔥

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Women here don’t “demand “ high salaries - they make these salaries themselves and have realistic view and experience at what life costs in dmv.
This forum leans to 40-50s age group

I'm a woman a the salaries described here are absolutely ridiculous even by DMV standards. That kind of salary is made by a very small percentage of the population, even if educated and 40+. Also, people with these salaries live very expensive lives without realizing they're actually in a bubble and that the lifestyle they want isn't the norm. You can pursue whoever you want but you also need to realize that a man's inability to make 200k+ isn't a moral failing on his part.

It's not a moral failure but many women make 100K out of college with STEM or other solid degree. Nurses make 120K in dmv area. If a dude makes 150K at 41 and wants to date 27-32 yo women he needs to think what he brings to table. They can date age peers who make about the same $$$

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The majority of women don’t bring much of anything to a relationship. Even if they are attractive their looks will fade. There is no reason for men to pursue a relationship unless they can financially benefit. It is worthwhile if you can marry a high earner or someone who has family money.

For a professionally and financially successful, mature, educated and physically highly attractive man--which is basically all the women who complain about the dating market are looking for--they don't need a woman who is career focused. These men have that covered already. They want a woman who is attractive, highly sexual but monogamous and loyal, and willing to have children and raise them including if that means putting their career on hold for at least a few years while the children are young.

If a woman is able and willing to bring those things to the table then she won't have any problems at all finding a decent man

No, you don't have to be a virgin, but a high body count is a huge red flag. Lying about your body count or shaming the man for caring about your body count is a deal breaker for these men.

You cant find a suitable man to seriously date you because you are woefully under qualified.

Well dayum! 🔥

What is the body count of these incense at 40 and why do they think they are entitled to ask or know women body count? Yakis!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The majority of women don’t bring much of anything to a relationship. Even if they are attractive their looks will fade. There is no reason for men to pursue a relationship unless they can financially benefit. It is worthwhile if you can marry a high earner or someone who has family money.

For a professionally and financially successful, mature, educated and physically highly attractive man--which is basically all the women who complain about the dating market are looking for--they don't need a woman who is career focused. These men have that covered already. They want a woman who is attractive, highly sexual but monogamous and loyal, and willing to have children and raise them including if that means putting their career on hold for at least a few years while the children are young.

If a woman is able and willing to bring those things to the table then she won't have any problems at all finding a decent man

No, you don't have to be a virgin, but a high body count is a huge red flag. Lying about your body count or shaming the man for caring about your body count is a deal breaker for these men.

You cant find a suitable man to seriously date you because you are woefully under qualified.

Well dayum! 🔥

What is the body count of these incense at 40 and why do they think they are entitled to ask or know women body count? Yakis!

If it bothers you that much; don't offer the information to your suitors and avoid men who care. Some men definitely care though. If it's not for you, move on.

[Anonymous]

Bizzarro DCUM lady has entered the chat