Why so many single men not interested in dating?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The majority of women don’t bring much of anything to a relationship. Even if they are attractive their looks will fade. There is no reason for men to pursue a relationship unless they can financially benefit. It is worthwhile if you can marry a high earner or someone who has family money.

For a professionally and financially successful, mature, educated and physically highly attractive man--which is basically all the women who complain about the dating market are looking for--they don't need a woman who is career focused. These men have that covered already. They want a woman who is attractive, highly sexual but monogamous and loyal, and willing to have children and raise them including if that means putting their career on hold for at least a few years while the children are young.

If a woman is able and willing to bring those things to the table then she won't have any problems at all finding a decent man

No, you don't have to be a virgin, but a high body count is a huge red flag. Lying about your body count or shaming the man for caring about your body count is a deal breaker for these men.

You cant find a suitable man to seriously date you because you are woefully under qualified.

Well dayum! 🔥

What is the body count of these incense at 40 and why do they think they are entitled to ask or know women body count? Yakis!

If it bothers you that much; don't offer the information to your suitors and avoid men who care. Some men definitely care though. If it's not for you, move on.

Of course I move on. It just deeply disgusting a 40 yo dude who lived his sexual life cares or bothers so much for women's sexual experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s why society used to prioritize no premarital sex and early marriage. It stabilizes society and nuclear families. Regular sex is very valuable to a male under 25.

This. We have accidentally created an aimless miserable culture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The majority of women don’t bring much of anything to a relationship. Even if they are attractive their looks will fade. There is no reason for men to pursue a relationship unless they can financially benefit. It is worthwhile if you can marry a high earner or someone who has family money.

For a professionally and financially successful, mature, educated and physically highly attractive man--which is basically all the women who complain about the dating market are looking for--they don't need a woman who is career focused. These men have that covered already. They want a woman who is attractive, highly sexual but monogamous and loyal, and willing to have children and raise them including if that means putting their career on hold for at least a few years while the children are young.

If a woman is able and willing to bring those things to the table then she won't have any problems at all finding a decent man

No, you don't have to be a virgin, but a high body count is a huge red flag. Lying about your body count or shaming the man for caring about your body count is a deal breaker for these men.

You cant find a suitable man to seriously date you because you are woefully under qualified.

Well dayum! 🔥

What is the body count of these incense at 40 and why do they think they are entitled to ask or know women body count? Yakis!

If it bothers you that much; don't offer the information to your suitors and avoid men who care. Some men definitely care though. If it's not for you, move on.

Of course I move on. It just deeply disgusting a 40 yo dude who lived his sexual life cares or bothers so much for women's sexual experience.

He's allowed to have preferences, as long as he owns the consequences and outcomes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This area is full of former military men who would do better if they move back to where they are from. Women here are not interested in dating them.

Maybe they are ugly or maybe they are looking for lawyers. Lawyers seem to be very picky.

There are a lot of military men in my family, and they do very well with women. But they are tall, fit and handsome. They are married to nurses, doctors, teachers etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.


I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Plenty of women have great careers and children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Women here don’t “demand “ high salaries - they make these salaries themselves and have realistic view and experience at what life costs in dmv.
This forum leans to 40-50s age group

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to want a partner in a similar situation to yourself. 40 year old navy vet has no business demanding a hot 27 year old, but he could likely meet a mid thirties woman who really wants marriage and family. But she’s too old for him!

Conversely a 40 year old divorced mom who makes 100k should not expect to meet a hot man making 300k, but could reasonably expect to find a man in a similar situation to herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Welp we’ve found the guys who strung along the women in their 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Welp we’ve found the guys who strung along the women in their 20s.

Why do you think so little of grown women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.


I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Plenty of women have great careers and children.

Are they the ones moaning everywhere and blaming everybody but themselves for losing their "prime years"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.


I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Plenty of women have great careers and children.

Are they the ones moaning everywhere and blaming everybody but themselves for losing their "prime years"?

Sorry but these time wasting men who won’t commit in their 20s are a well known thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.


I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Plenty of women have great careers and children.

Are they the ones moaning everywhere and blaming everybody but themselves for losing their "prime years"?

Sorry but these time wasting men who won’t commit in their 20s are a well known thing.

You're doing it again. If a woman is not being treated well or has a man "wasting her time" or not aligning with what goals she has for her life, she has every agency in the world to set boundaries and leave. Your time can only be "wasted" if you allow it. She should also fix her picker next time, be intentional about finding a marriage-minded man who aligns with her values and prioritize doing the things that need to be done in order to meet such a man during her "prime window".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You meant to say 21 year old "women "

I’ve worked 15+ years in higher ed, with our “best and brightest” , and believe me when I tell you that despite what the law says, 21-year-olds are kids.
Not women.
Not men.
Kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.

I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Welp we’ve found the guys who strung along the women in their 20s.

How does someone string you along? Are you a puppet or a person?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the "old sperm autism" theory is a bit overblown, especially compared to geriatric pregnancy and egg viability concerns which get worse at 35 for women.

Women have their preferences e.g., 6 figures, 6" doodad etc... but when men express preference it's the end of the world.

The 6-6-6 thing is a lie made up by red pilled incels who have never actually spoken to a woman.

Time and again, women have explained what they want, but men would rather listen to other men about women's preferences.

To be fair, I think the “men want younger women for fertility” thing is also way overblown.

I mean, I’ve known men who didn’t know what labia were called or didn’t know that women can pee with tampons in. Yet these men are also experts in female fertility? I’m not buying it.


I also think most men don’t even care all that much about having their own kids. Most seem to do it because it’s expected, but I’ve only met maybe 2 men who REALLY wanted kids. The rest just sort of took them or left them.

Of course his “want kids” claim is simply to justify needing access to much younger body. He failed to commit to anyone in 20-30s when he was in that age group . Was parting, drinking and sleeping around with 20 yo “wh…res”. Now he wants a 27 yo “old virgin” to marry. Classic redpill toxic misogynist

Wonder how many age appropriate women he strung along and wouldn’t commit to in his 20s/early 30s. But now that he’s 40, he’s ready to settle down!! No old broads please!!

As a man I agree that it’s much better to date within your own age bracket and not to pursue younger women (who were in grade school when these men were in college). But I do have to point out that some of the salaries some women are describing as their minimums here are only achieved in the 40s and 50s… so if these 20- and 30-something women don’t want to live in what’s been described as “poverty” maybe their best option is a big law partner who spent his 30s grinding at work?

Or we could stop placing such a premium on being in the top 5% of earners and more value on personality and other life goals…

I have to think the women demanding high salaries are outliers that are over represented here and the internet at large. When I was in my 20s I and most of my friends dated men who were around our same age (maybe plus one or two years) and in a similar position in life. I did not know many women who were holding out for 666 or whatever, but I DID see plenty of examples of men wasting womens prime reproductive years and then not marrying them.

Also, I have been around the military and I find that most military men in their 20s don't have an issue finding a life. For plenty of women, they find it a good deal, especially if the woman is from an economically disadvantaged area around a military base. If this man is a he described, he could easily have married in his 20s.

Take some accountability. They wasted their own "primes" by not being decisive. You all go on and one about how women aren't bang maids or incubators and then also come out with this "prime reproductive years" crap. Which is it? Are you an empowered agent or not? Are you more than a babymaker or not?

Nobody owes you marriage. If that is what you're looking for, be decisive and go find it. Or stay single. Just spare us the constant moaning about your inability to take accountability and proactively build the life you want.

+1.
You cannot have it all. If you want to prioritize your prime reproductive years, date a man 5 years older. Why should a man put your prime reproductive years ahead of his prime career building years? Next thing he knows you are sad about not being able to take 5 months off with a newborn because you need both salaries to pay bills, or you are complaining about him working long hours and not supporting you enough with the baby.

You can choose to prioritize your career, and that is an excellent choice. But don't turn around and blame men for it.

Plenty of women have great careers and children.

Yes, and they didn't waste time on unserious men.