Jussie Smollett attacked

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

If he's lying, the current atmosphere in the States is too volatile for the truth to come out. It will be absorbed by the PD unless some newshound has the desire to keep hunting.

Yeah, but most newshounds are Democrat so they will not hunt this any more.

Since it does not fit their chosen narrative, the media will bury this story until it fades away.

Sadly, I have to agree with you. I wish the whole story would come out, however . . .

Let's be optimistic for a change.

Someone, somewhen, somehow, WILL get to the bottom of this.

And then we'll read it and share like crazy.

Deal?

I hate Star Trek, by the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

+1
The more (or rather, less) we hear about this, the more convinced I am that it was either heavily embellished or didn't happen at all. I think the worst of it was making it seem like the attackers, if they exist, were Trump supporters. That is truly awful if he made that up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

+1
The more (or rather, less) we hear about this, the more convinced I am that it was either heavily embellished or didn't happen at all. I think the worst of it was making it seem like the attackers, if they exist, were Trump supporters. That is truly awful if he made that up.

Of course he made that up.

He knows how to trigger the media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

+1
The more (or rather, less) we hear about this, the more convinced I am that it was either heavily embellished or didn't happen at all. I think the worst of it was making it seem like the attackers, if they exist, were Trump supporters. That is truly awful if he made that up[b].

Of course he made that up.

He knows how to trigger the media.

and that's exactly why this story is going to slowly go away- never to be discussed again by the media. if fake news works in their favor, they're totally okay with using it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

+1
The more (or rather, less) we hear about this, the more convinced I am that it was either heavily embellished or didn't happen at all. I think the worst of it was making it seem like the attackers, if they exist, were Trump supporters. That is truly awful if he made that up[b].

Of course he made that up.

He knows how to trigger the media.

and that's exactly why this story is going to slowly go away- never to be discussed again by the media. if fake news works in their favor, they're totally okay with using it.

A longtime pal shared the story with me when it broke. She was in an uproar over it. As the story started to unravel, I didn't bring it up again - and neither did she. I am almost 100% certain that she would still side with him if the ugly truth did come out - blaming the media. So I think that it probably is best for this story to just go away . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

+1
The more (or rather, less) we hear about this, the more convinced I am that it was either heavily embellished or didn't happen at all. I think the worst of it was making it seem like the attackers, if they exist, were Trump supporters. That is truly awful if he made that up[b].

Of course he made that up.

He knows how to trigger the media.

and that's exactly why this story is going to slowly go away- never to be discussed again by the media. if fake news works in their favor, they're totally okay with using it.

A longtime pal shared the story with me when it broke. She was in an uproar over it. As the story started to unravel, I didn't bring it up again - and neither did she. I am almost 100% certain that she would still side with him if the ugly truth did come out - blaming the media. So I think that it probably is best for this story to just go away . . .

That, and also go find smarter pals

[Anonymous]

the drive by media. throw out a bunch of garbage and see what sticks.

[Anonymous]

He's going to be interviewed by Robin Roberts on GMA tomorrow morning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's going to be interviewed by Robin Roberts on GMA tomorrow morning.

not a good move on her part. I wouldn't want to touch that story with a 10 foot pole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the drive by media. throw out a bunch of garbage and see what sticks.

Yeah that's basically it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's going to be interviewed by Robin Roberts on GMA tomorrow morning.

He appears to be acting during this interview - https://www.yahoo.com/news/jussie-smollett-speaks-racist-homophobic-191400721.html

the video - https://twitter.com/i/status/1095761589649752065

[Anonymous]

Lock him up

[Anonymous]

What a pos

[Anonymous]

This is a move out of the trump playbook......double down on your stupid lies with fake outrage. Yawn......seen it before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

+1
The more (or rather, less) we hear about this, the more convinced I am that it was either heavily embellished or didn't happen at all. I think the worst of it was making it seem like the attackers, if they exist, were Trump supporters. That is truly awful if he made that up[b].

Of course he made that up.

He knows how to trigger the media.

and that's exactly why this story is going to slowly go away- never to be discussed again by the media. if fake news works in their favor, they're totally okay with using it.

+100
Example 3,848,200,433 of liberal hypocrisy.