Jussie Smollett attacked

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

You’d have to be a gullible fool to believe that story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something about these replies are rubbing me the wrong way. It's as if people are insinuating that Jussie did something to deserve this. Like this is somehow his fault.

smh, I guess nothing should really surprise me anymore.

I don’t know what a lot of these replies are even implying. Like let’s “wait for the whole story”.
What do they think the “whole story” could possibly reveal?
That he is at fault or they’re spinning a conspiracy theory?

You were saying?

[Anonymous]

Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

If he's lying, the current atmosphere in the States is too volatile for the truth to come out. It will be absorbed by the PD unless some newshound has the desire to keep hunting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

If he's lying, the current atmosphere in the States is too volatile for the truth to come out. It will be absorbed by the PD unless some newshound has the desire to keep hunting.

Yeah, but most newshounds are Democrat so they will not hunt this any more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rob Elgas, ABC news has tweeted that Smollett has turned over phone records within an hour of the attack to investigators.

DP. Here’s a tweet from him:

“MORE: Chicago police tell @ABC and @ABC7Chicago Jussie Smollett's "limited and redacted" phone records were given to detectives at 1:28pm (Chicago time) today.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobElgasABC7

Devil’s in the details.

voila!

no more MAGA talk
some other liquid but not bleach?
Rope is not significant, I guess.

And will the REAL story every come out?

Rob Elgas
@RobElgasABC7
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman
@AJGuglielmi
tells
@ABC7Chicago
"We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

My initial reaction was to be really upset that he was attacked but as the details and time line comes out I'm starting to think he made it up or it did not happen as he reported it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

If he's lying, the current atmosphere in the States is too volatile for the truth to come out. It will be absorbed by the PD unless some newshound has the desire to keep hunting.

Yeah, but most newshounds are Democrat so they will not hunt this any more.

Since it does not fit their chosen narrative, the media will bury this story until it fades away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

If he's lying, the current atmosphere in the States is too volatile for the truth to come out. It will be absorbed by the PD unless some newshound has the desire to keep hunting.

Yeah, but most newshounds are Democrat so they will not hunt this any more.

Since it does not fit their chosen narrative, the media will bury this story until it fades away.

Sadly, I have to agree with you. I wish the whole story would come out, however . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so are we 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 that this supposed attack never happened. or are the majority of us regular folks still believing his story.

curious.

90% it's pure BS

(Meaning the political/maga stuff. Probably it was some sex/drugs gone bad)

this is PP. When I first heard the story I was shocked, and felt awful for him. Then I started reading the details and found so many things that just didn't add up - putting me in 70/30 category I guess.

I do believe that it's possible an "attack" of some sort happened, but that it had something to do with a bad Tinder situation.

Wonder if he'll eventually admit the real details.

He's black and openly gay and anti-maga so he won't, he's above all that "real details" stuff.

If he's lying, the current atmosphere in the States is too volatile for the truth to come out. It will be absorbed by the PD unless some newshound has the desire to keep hunting.

Yeah, but most newshounds are Democrat so they will not hunt this any more.

Since it does not fit their chosen narrative, the media will bury this story until it fades away.

Sadly, I have to agree with you. I wish the whole story would come out, however . . .

Let's be optimistic for a change.

Someone, somewhen, somehow, WILL get to the bottom of this.

And then we'll read it and share like crazy.

Deal?