Neither is moving 80 miles away from your child. |
Any update, OP? I've been thinking about you. Sorry you're in such a tough situation. |
The Dad here has been accommodated for a long time and that is part of the problem - change is hard for most men as they age.
Another part of the problem is that Dad does not recognize the needs of his young adult child. Sure Dad can make a lot of noise about court but not only is it expensive but the likely outcome is that the 17 year old's will is prioritized. When it comes to custodial time, the courts consider what is in the best interest of the child. It is not in the best interest of a 17 year old to travel 1.5 hours each way to visit a Dad when the 17 year old is extremely busy with school which more than ever is a huge factor in college admissions. The courts COULD mandate the father make the 1.5 hr trip instead to acccommodate the child's needs. Is Dad willing to take that risk? One of my friends grew up spending the summers with her father on the east coast (she grew up on the west coast). During and after college she stayed on the east coast near dad, married locally and raised a family. Although she didn't grow up with her father as a daily presence 9 months of the year, she still had a strong relationship with him. Another one of my friends was forced to live with her divorced dad as a teen. She really didn't like it and as soon as she was old enough, she left him to live with mom. To this day she doesn't talk to him (he was apparently a deeply unpleasant person). He doesn't get to see his grandchildren. It is not advised to treat children like a punch-in, punch-out time clock. They are people with needs - little people, but people nonetheless. The courts create a framework to facilitate those needs but at the end of the day the courts cannot mold a relationship. For that, the parents need to rely on their people skills. |
This is OP back. I haven’t wanted to post on here with any specifics because I am afraid of my ex reading this, and things got uglier. But things have been absolute hell and when my DS turns 18 in a couple months, I genuinely fear he will never speak to my ex again. I did not alienate my ex - he alienated himself from our son. |
Sorry to hear that, OP.
I hope your son has had some happiness his senior year, despite everything. He sounds like a great, and busy, kid. It's a shame that his father has so little respect and regard for him and what is important to him. |
+1. OP, ignore the troll. Sorry things have been so ugly. I see this happening with my 17yo nephew, although the facts are a little different (no football, closer than 80 miles, etc.) and he just turned 17 so still has a year to go. At least you only have a couple months to go, and if there is no relationship between DS and your ex after that, then so be it. Hang in there. |
OP, fortunately you only have a few months left. If the court holds you in contempt, let them. Just document everything (your sons texts etc) and demonstrate diligence.
Buy your son train tickets with his name on it so that you can prove diligence with planning and facilitating visitation. Send your son and husband emails with specific times and dates for where they need to be for drop offs and pickups. If a motion for contempt is filed, you have 30 days to respond to the motion. Respond with the paperwork (copies of emails, train tickets 🎫 etc) and a written answer showing an attempt to comply. The judge won't rule contempt. |
There’s no “next summer” for a 17 year old who will be 18 in Spring ‘23. He’ll be 18. |
Imagine having to force your 17.5 year old to see one of their parents, and thinking it’s the kid that’s the problem. |
Image a teen having their own opinion. |
PP here. I was implying the dad was the problem. |
AMEN. |
Buying train tickets and not putting him on the train is not facilitating visits. Be real. That's clear you are setting up the situation to fail. |
Do you think OP should physically restrain her child and buckle him in the car? |
If your 18 y/o needs to be threatened and forced to see you, look in the mirror. |