How is this helpful? You do not share any sibling history with the OP. It's not "objectively unusual" without fully knowing the dynamic. |
I mean it goes both ways, right? If the sibling only kept this from the OP, then that is even weirder and has nothing to do with previous losses that many on here have been speculating. Sibling clearly don't like OP, doesn't visit, and thinks badly of them, otherwise why play this weird game. Maybe their dislike of OP is justified, maybe not, I don't think any of us has the info to really know. |
OP had a poor reaction to finding out about the baby. If siblings history suggested that reaction, it makes it more likely she wouldn’t have shared issues of loss. |
Exactly, they thought it was a joke that her sibling had a baby instead of congratulating like a proper human being would have. Says it all! |
+1 Well said. |
Well said? Really? I can’t even figure out what this poster is trying to convey. It’s odd to say something is well said by someone who doesn’t know the difference between a plural and possessive. |
PP you are way too rational for DCUM. You should find a new website because your line of thinking won’t work here. Admitting you don’t know something is not really done. |
This is where we are. We can't defend OP and the indefensible OP apologists, so now we're squabbling over whether a statement that omits an apostrophe can be subjectively qualified as "well said". |
|
OP is excused for asking at first if it was a joke. But once she realized it wasn't, removing herself from the group chat/facetime was rude. And describing here that she "sadly" realized it wasn't a joke, is all we need to hear to figure out why the sister didn't share her pregnancy news in the first place.
Removing herself from the chat confirms that the sister (who OP says is prone to "drama") made the right call to keep OP at a distance. It also sounds like OP and the sibling being in "regular contact" the last 6 months was probably both being on the group chat, not them calling each other weekly, or texting each other every few days about what the kids are up to. |
I wrote the post that she responded to. My point is that strangers and random acquaintances know that people are pregnant before they give birth, and her story tried to refute that, but instead verified it. So, what is the point that she was trying to make? |
You are the one who is obtuse. She is not sad about the baby; she is sad about the poor state of her relationship with her sibling, which she thought was fine until that moment. |
Obviously not very sad, since she’s chosen to end the relationship. |
Yeah, leaving the chat is just buying into the drama and reflecting it back on OP. There were no doubt others who were also surprised? I have a sister who can be passive aggressive with information and I've given up trying to figure out what I "did" to make her treat me in that way. But the sequence is more like: 1) she tells everyone else the news (except me), 2) posts it on social media, 3) I then wish her well and congratulations, and 4) with faux surprise she says she thought our mom would have told me. SHe doesn't like to talk on the phone so mainly texts and doesn't visit to I see her in person only at family events or when I visit (she lives in the same city as my parents). She's kind of like the queen bee of the family is the way I'd phrase it. I admit the relationship bothers me and I wish it was better but me getting outwardly huffy would only make things worse. |
OP here. Thank you. This is exactly it. I wasn’t sad the baby was born of course, but sad that my sister didn’t think to tell me before it happened. Because of that choice, I have sadly realized that the relationship I thought we had is nonexistent, and I will no longer be in touch with this person. I will redirect the energy and resources into the other children in my life whose parents value our relationship. Thank you for understanding the situation as I described it and not misconstruing my words. |
OP here. I don’t think I could suffer that level of abuse. No thanks. |