His wife confirmed the beating(s). BELIEVE ALL WOMEN!! |
This is a lie. If you have evidence that Mr. Abrego Garcia is now or has ever been a member of a gang, please, please post it here. Otherwise, STFU. |
He is not nor ever was a legal resident of Maryland. |
That’s really bad. Multiple violent assaults on his wife for 3 years? Endangering their infant child?? I am no longer on this guy’s side. He should stay in his country. |
This administration has admitted the deportation to El Salvador was a “clerical error.” Please explain how being deported to a foreign prison because of a paperwork snafu and then left to rot there even when the error was caught amounts to due process? |
Did you not click the link to the actual court papers? Evidence was presented on both sides. He had a Lawyer. He lost. |
Sigh. None of this is about being on any side. People are upset because our POTUS is grossly overriding due process and failing to adhere to rule of law. I am on the constitution’s side. |
He didn’t need a hearing to prove he is in a gang to be removed. He is removable because he is an illegal alien. He tried to plead asylum but that failed. He had due process in 2019 but judge declined to give him amnesty. |
The constitution has nothing to say about this case. Trump hasn’t violated any court order. |
^^^ Those documents on the website offer no corroborated evidence that Abrego Garcia is a member of a gang. It appears that one person claimed he is a gang member, yet he has no criminal history, and nothing to tie him to a gang except an accusation by an anonymous person whose motives are unknown. Is the person a paid informant? For ICE to pick him up off the street and send him to an El Salvador prison without due process should send shivers down the spine of every American. |
Those documents have the original hearing in April 2019, and the appeal in December 2019. He lost both. That seems like due process to me. |
That’s not what due process means. Due process doesn’t mean government never makes mistakes. He had an order of removal. He wasn’t supposed to be moved to El Salvador - that was the error. But he still had an order of removal and received due process as part of that. |
SCOTUS told the gubmint to facilitate the man's return to the USA. That has not happened. The government is in violation of a SCOTUS order. |
His removal order doesn’t require evidence of gang membership. |
Wrong. SCOTUS told the judge to clarify her order especially in terms of “effectuate” with respect for the executive branch. She still hasn’t done so. SCOTUS never mandated a return of Garcia to the US. It mandated “facilitate” a release IN ES. |