You are the polar opposite of Brunch Granny. It's not ok for retirees to enjoy their retirement? Why are they beholden to you? |
You mean spending in-person time with your grandchildren that doesn't require parental supervision? That is a pretty low bar. |
But the parents won't be there, yes? You're not planning to invite you parents to eat dinner with you or something like that right? |
When my husband's DIL wanted us to move to their state to be closer to their child aka babysitting whenever she needed it no questions asked, I told her what she told me, it's YOUR child, raise it yourself. BOOM her.
Younger people have a lot of nerve. Like thinking we're only here to make their lives easier. There's help and then there's taking advantage. Then the little shits turn on you. Disrespectful punks. They sure know who to call when they need money. |
dp.. "interest in grandkids" doesn't mean regular childcare. You just want free childcare. Your parents finished raising you. You as a parent knows how hard it is to raise kids, and deal with them. Why on earth do you think grandparents who may be 65+ want to do that again for another several years? If I have grandkids, I'm willing to babysit once in a while, but I'm not a regular free babysitter. Retirement is supposed to be the golden years where you get to relax, not watch over children. -gen xer |
| I know some younger boomers in their early 60s who are still trying to help their late 20s / early 30s adult children get on their feet. And these were good parents who did the "right" things by DCUM standards. By the time some adult children finally grow up and are stable enough to have kids, their parents are worn out. My Gen X siblings and I were fully out of the nest by 22. It seems to take a bit longer than it used to. |
What? Your parents already raised you. They dedicated 20 years to making you their sole priority and they now also need to take care of your kids or you are letting them suffer and die alone? How have you repaid them for the 20 years of raising you? Wtf? |
So why don't younger generations simply stop paying for SS and Medicare then? I'd like to keep more of my hard-earned money for my own retirement instead of being forced to subsidize gilded pleasure cruises for greedy and ungrateful boomers. I mean, Boomers selfishly never paid enough into the system, so why should anyone else feel bad about wanting to keep more of their own money now? |
| Let's face it boomers are awful and selfish with everything |
Most boomers can't afford that. If your boomers can afford pleasure cruises, be grateful that they saved for retirement and that you don't have to financially support them. |
After watching two family members deal with injuries that occurred on grandparent’s watch, I understand it. Watching a toddler will require much faster reflexes than visiting most touristy spots. Now if your mom is climbing Machu Picchu without a guide or free driving an underwater complex in Thailand, I understand. |
Some did for sure. Everyone didn't live close together, though. The youngest boomers (1946 - 64) are coming up on 60; still working age. I'm 53. My grandparents didn’t help raise me. I can think of one or two friends who even saw their grandparents regularly. |
+1 It's like this PP expects the parents to take care of them for 20 years, then help take care of their kids for another 20 years in exchange for taking care of the parents for like maybe 5 years. -gen xer |
+1 I'm 53, and I would find watching toddlers way too tiring. But, I can sit on a plane, train, car, bus for hours. It's not the same thing. |
Read more carefully. I said "may have". And, I'm not a boomer. |