Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
I’m female. I have faced sexual violence because of my body, like millions of women throughout history. Democrats now demand that I pretend that violence against females doesn’t exist, and that I prioritize the feelings of men over my physical safety. They tell me that my identity as a woman, including all that I have endured by virtue of being a woman, is open for colonization by men, and in fact men are better at being women than women born female. That’s erasure. And you cannot stomp your feet and tell me that it is not happening. |
Why tolerate all the name calling trump does? |
Well said. I have no problems acknowledging that there is a small group of people who wish their sex is different than the sex they were born with. I have a serious problem with using the state to compel a new state religion. |
The Democratic Party claims none of the bolded. Referring to trans women as women doesn’t mean you can’t acknowledge that they’re trans. It just means you shouldn’t call them men. I’m sure you understand the difference. And there is no Democratic policy in place to “criminalize” speech about sex as a biological characteristic. Some people have a gender that is different from their sex. That’s all. |
No, they don’t. If this is about the idea that a man would chop of his genitalia just to perve on you in the bathroom, I’m sorry, that’s not happening. |
Utter nonsense. I don't know what the ultimate answer is about where transgender people fit in but denying their complete existence is hogwash. They have always existed, exist now and will exist in the future. Your denial of reality does not actually alter reality. |
|
Thank for taking the time to write all of this. I really appreciate you putting this into words. I respect all people. Most of us are trying to thrive and struggle together.
It’s not a one person loses or another person wins scenario, but it feels that way sometimes when we have limited attention and resources. And I get shut down when I say “what about me?” I feel like traditional feminism is not popular. There is nothing wrong w JK Rawling’s positions . She was abused, she was divorced, she also struggled in this unfair, anti women world. She was a single mom. She earned a right to her opinion. Why did everyone jump all over her? |
Everyone did not jump all over her. Some disagreed and some agreed. |
She got and still gets a nearly endless stream of graphic rape and death threats from trans activists. Ironically that response really just shows that she’s right to worry about violence against women and the importance of the preservation of single-sex spaces. |
It’s always with the minimizing and dismissals from you, isn’t it? Look, the gaslighting isn’t working any more. |
Abuse on anonymous chat forums is cheap and cowardly and scary. Why do so many women and men that are sexually assaulted never report? Ugly behavior comes out when you don't have to reveal your identity. Why do racist thugs often wear hoods when the strut around with their torches? What's wrong folks...why can't we see who you are? |
Easier to have other people/authorities make decisions for them? |
Stop gaslighting. Even on this site, we are warned not to use the "transphobic" term "biological women." You can say there is no "Democratic policy" to criminalize free speech, which is incorrect (every senate Democrat supported the Democracy for All bill that sought to curtail free speech). But politics is downstream from culture. Meaning that first they get everyone warm to an idea, and then they make it law. Ask yourself, if you could ban speech that would criminalize acknowledging that trans women aren't biological women, would you? |
You’ll have our response in November. Go back to serving your skirt-wearing masters. A noble cause, really. |
How often do you see racist thugs holding torches? |